• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Source B and C, which is more useful?

Extracts from this document...


GCSE History Coursework Britain In The Second World War 'Evacuation' 1) In this essay, I will be discussing the usefulness of two different sources about the start of evacuation. The first source is a photograph taken in September 1939, showing children being evacuated, and the second is a recount from a teacher, in 1988. Source B is a photograph showing evacuees walking to a train station, in September 1939. From my own knowledge, I know that even before the war started, children were being evacuated with their teachers, to "places of safety", which were places in the country, away from big cities that were likely to be bombed. Even though this may be propaganda, it shows the attitudes of the government at the time, and the techniques that were used to convince the public that evacuation was the best thing to do. ...read more.


Another limitation is that it is just a photograph. It doesn't show the children's real emotion or what they were thinking. It just shows one set of children, on one day, so it is a limited time span. It also contradicts what Source C states which is that the children were silent and "too afraid to talk", by showing them smiling and waving. It is, however, usual because it gives us an understanding of how the government portrayed evacuation. As already stated, Source C is completely different from the government image. It is taken from an interview with a teacher, retelling the evacuation with the children from her school. From my own knowledge, I know that teachers escorted the children on their journey. This also links with the adults in Source B. ...read more.


This is also just one teacher, on one day, and will be a limited account of evacuation. In addition, the interview was given in 1988, 40 years afterwards, so the teacher may have forgotten some key details. What's more, this interview is from an adult, telling it from an adults view. A child evacuee would have a completely different outlook on the process, so the interview does not tell both sides. It is usual because it explores the attitudes towards evacuation. In conclusion, both sources are useful to a historian, but it depends on what we wish to know. If we want to know about how the government portrayed evacuation, the Source B is more useful, but if we want to know about how about the attitudes towards evacuation, then Source C is more useful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    the scene were probably exaggerated making the source a less reliable attitude than the attitude in source E. From my own knowledge I know that the film was a semi-autobiographical account of the director's early childhood. This makes source F reliable because the director would have remembered details of his

  2. How useful is Source G when examining the children's evacuation journey?

    my own knowledge that many foster parents were so bad that they even abused their evacuees. This is an example of the novel possibly being censored because it's for children. Therefore this once again makes Source G unreliable because of some important information being excluded.

  1. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    Emmeline Pankhurst said, "Our women were thrown about, tripped up, their arms and fingers twisted, their bodies doubled under, and then forcibly thrown, if indeed they did not drop stunned to the ground". Three women died shortly after, but Pankhurst persisted in spite of government resistance through letter-burnings, petitions and window smashing.

  2. Which source is the most useful as evidence about the start of the children's ...

    of children looking happy about being evacuated, the parents would come round to thinking that evacuation was a positive thing. This use of propaganda makes Source B a very unreliable source because it is trying to show the parents of the children who were about to be evacuated that evacuation was a positive action.

  1. How useful are useful sources 1-8 in showing similarities and the differences in the ...

    These jobs paid very high wages and need skill to do the job properly this would have meant that only upper and middle class women would have been given the job. As much dangerous this job was it also was a very important job as much of world war 2

  2. How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    program "Black adder", and so is bound to be sarcastic, funny, and partially biased. After reading this source I can clearly see that it is meant to be humorous. As it involves comedy, it really has to be one- sided; in order to make a good comedy on such a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work