• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study sources A and B - How far do these sources agree about prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Prohibition coursework question (a) Study sources A and B How far do these sources agree about prohibition? (7 marks) Both sources, A and B agree on the fact that 1917 was a very significant year when it came to prohibition. Source A says that 'By 1917, twenty-three states had already introduced a ban on alcohol'. Source B also says that 1917 was significant because: 'In 1917 a nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon league, brought pressure on the congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing'. Both sources also stress the importance of the Anti-Saloon league. Source A says '...the influence of the Anti-saloon league at a time when large number of men were absent from the armed forces'. Source B says '...a nation-wide movement, led by the Anti-saloon league'. This was a campaign led by people who were moral protesters to alcohol and believed that it was an evil in society. Both sources actually mention that alcohol and the saloons they were served in were seen as an evil in society. ...read more.


Both sources mention that each group thought that drink brought ruin and debauchery. Both sources A and B agree that the introduction of prohibition increased the crime rate. Source A says 'No earlier law had produced such widespread crime' and 'It created the greatest criminal boom in American history'. Source B says 'prohibition....big, violent business'. They both also agree on the fact that the general public didn't abstain from alcohol even though it was illegal. Source A says '...desires of so many Americans' and source B quotes Al Capone saying 'All I do is supply a public demand'. This source mainly concentrates on the fact that ordinary American people were led to break the law. However, Source A tries to show that ordinary people had turned to crime. Source A says 'No earlier law had produced such widespread crime. For no law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans'. Source B refers more to organised crime. ...read more.


However, nothing of this sort was mentioned in Source A. Both source A and B show that the consequence of prohibition was the increase in the crime rate. However, source A shows that ordinary people had to break the law in order to get alcohol, but source B talks more about organised crime and how that had increased. Source B also shows the fact that 'The first prohibition commissioner had no doubt that he would stamp out the evils of drink.'. Nothing like this was actually written in source A. Both Sources A and B were not actual eye-witness accounts, but rather, they were researched, as the caption under Source A is '...Published in 1973' and the caption under Source B says, '...Published in 1979.' I think that these two sources agree considerably with each other, as they both mention that 1917 was a very important year, and they both mention there was a protest against liquor. Furthermore, they both mention that the consequence was a rise in crime. However, their focal points are different - while Source A locates prohibition in the ambience of the Second World War, Source B emphasises more on the moral campaign. Abbas Tejani ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Both of the two sources agree about prohibition. Source A believes that it was ...

    They have no choice but to watch their money go down the drain. Also in source D, it shows a poor woman and child looking into the saloon where their father is knowing they can never have the clothes or food they require because the expenses of alcohol.

  2. How far was the League of Nations a success in the 1920(TM)s?

    After honest disapproval and the submission of fiscal sanctions the league could alternatively force to uphold its decisions.

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    The children are not inside the saloon possibly because the father does not want them to see that he is wasting the money on this instead of on the children-his family. Also the saloon was seen as a corruptive place and children would not have gone in there.

  2. Roosevelt Sources Question

    The man goes on to say how him and his wife pray for him every night; it is said that he isn't the only one. There are many millions of others. This is the best example of public opinion i think.

  1. History - Prohibition

    By 1929 he had destroyed the power of the other Chicago gangs, committing at least 3000 murders in the process. However, Source I only shows that the law enforcers where willing to be bribed and that they were corrupt. It does not talk about the saloons or how the gangsters persuaded those officials to accept the bribes they offered.

  2. Did Roosevelt's character, upbringing and background make it easy for him to understand the ...

    This scheme helped most people in some way or another. * FCA (Farm Credit Association) - This basically gave loans to farmers who owed money to the bank. This helped them as the interest levels were lower. $100 million was loaned out in total.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    the letter was written in hindsight and therefore with a good knowledge of the decade's previous events. This adds to the reliability of the source. However, the fact that the author of the source was an Industrialist means that the first part of the source may be written from an

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    moral excitement created by the, 'War to Make the World Safe for Democracy'. Source B does not even mention this campaign, or any of the other explanations source A gives, bar the Anti-Saloon League. The historian who wrote source B believed the main causes of prohibition were the Women's Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-Saloon League.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work