However, Source C does not support Source A about the Suffragette campaign. Source C shows a posters created by the National League for Opposing Woman’s Suffrage (N.L.OW.S). This campaign was against the Suffragette campaign and mainly composed of men. These men did not need to fight for their vote as they already have the rights but men joined this campaign because men were frustrated of women using violence and disturbing their time such as disrupting important meetings. Source A shows, the important role which women will do but this was not surely true. Women did not all really do this role but some did, the Suffragette campaign was using violence. As Source A is propaganda, it will sure be one sided, it shows irresponsible men and the phrase “What a man may have been & yet no have the vote”. But this was not true, not all men were irresponsible or taking something away from society like guilty convict. Source C does not support Source A as Source A shows irresponsible mother, who left her two children doing her job, crying, suffering as she is not there. The father coming after a hard day work and see’s what she has done, still she is not there after several hours. This can be proved she was away for long time because the candle light went off which can’t be lit for hours. Both sources shows opposite views and each differ about the purpose of the message. Source A shows irresponsible men and responsible women but Source C is the opposite responsible men and irresponsible women.
However, on the other hand, Source C supports Source B as they both were produced by the National Anti-Suffrage organisation in UK. This shows the Suffragettes were getting closer to get the right vote, which men didn’t like. These men feared of long term effort which was the main issues. Source A, the father who came from work, see’s the mother who left for two children alone in the house doing her work. She wrote a note “Back in hour or so” but she still was not there after an hour. This can be proved because the candle has gone out and the childers who waited long for more than an hour caused them to starvy cry, and upset. The father is very upset, and this change feared him, he wanted wonted women to continue with their traditional role as wife and mother but this was changing. Source B also shows the fear of long term effect, Mr.Maconochie who spoke against the women’s suffrage see’s that “there were 1,300,000 more women than men in the country”. He belived that the political voting power would be placed in the hands of the women who would be able to vote.
However, Source C does not support Source B as evidence of the Suffragettes campaign. Source B, only tells about the “Franchise women,” not about the Suffragettes who used the violence. Source B is a meeting of the Anti-Suffrage Society which was reported in the East Grinstead Observe in 1905. This report does not show the tactics or events of the Suffragettes campaign. There was only “a large attendance chiefly of ladies” that cares to “debate on Women’s Suffrage!” Source B does not mention the word suffragette which shows that there’s no support of the Suffragette campaign. But in this Source B, “Many of the ladies in the audience seemed to approve and he was most warmly welcomed” even when Mr.Maconochie was “again the extension of the franchise to women.” He had a good speech and a good reason for opposing but normally the Suffragette would probably use violence at that time, but there’s no evidence in source B. Also Source c shows an irresponsible mother and opposing the woman’s suffrage. It does not tell us or shows us about what the Suffragette campaign did, such as smashing paintings. There’s no evidence of this, which both sources B and C shows.
Overall, in my conclusion I believe that Source C supports with the most as evidence of the Suffragette campaign, because they are both against the Suffragette campaign which is evidence that there is a Suffragette campaign. Both Sources showed that the Suffragette campaign was getting strong, which made more of the Anti-Suffrage Society persuade people not to support them as Source C shows a propaganda poster, trying to get the public on not to support the Suffragette campaign. However in my views, Source A supports Source C is the opposition of the Suffragette. They are not the same organisation so the Source C the least because the two sources are different from each which does not support the Suffragette campaign. Source A, is a propaganda poster made by the Suffragette. They are not the same organisation, so the Source C will not support with Source A as evidence about the Suffragette campaign.
