• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources G and H - Do these prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

d. Study Sources G and H. Do these prove that Prohibition was successful? (8 marks) In sources G and H they show the statistics of what agents for prohibition were able to do while enforcing prohibition during selected years during prohibition. Some of the information given backs up prohibition and others parts of the given sources show statistics that illustrates some areas that Prohibition was not working. In source G it is showing the general statistics of the activities of the federal government agents enforcing prohibition, with the figures of the years 1921, 1925 and 1929. The information provided is very spread out but gives us a good idea of what happened at the beginning and during prohibition. The information available is on the "Illegal stills seized" and the "Gallons of spirits seized". The information given only covers the beginning and the majority of prohibition. It does not have any information from 1930 up to the end of Prohibition, which was 1933. The numbers are raising through out the statistics, the further into prohibition the more the raids. ...read more.

Middle

Another way of looking at this is that the federal agents were getting increasingly good at seizing alcohol. If a person thinks that the federal agents were getting better at their job therefore leading to an increase of amount of busts as prohibition then they would see this as prohibition was actually effective at this point of prohibition. But if someone thinks that the numbers of criminal gangs were just constantly rising and that the numbers of spirits being seized should be decreasing because the public should be starting to see the evils of alcohol and that the majority of alcohol should have already be removed at the beginning of prohibition. Because of the public demand the amount of alcohol increased and it was getting much easier for the federal agents to capture someone in use of alcohol. In Source G, it focuses in on just one city, City of Philadelphia. The table shows the number of arrests for drinking-related offences in the years 1920, 1923 and 1925. ...read more.

Conclusion

It only contains information that is about the City of Philadelphia. Another thing is what the policemen did when they arrested people who had committed a drinking related offense. This is important to know because the policemen might have taken an account that the person was drunk but was the penalty they got for it severe enough to put the person off and not to do it again of did the people who had upset the law just got a verbal warning, which probably made the person think that they could get away with it again. These sources that have been considered within this essay have pointed to the use of alcohol rose through prohibition and that this shows that the use of alcohol was becoming increasingly liked by the public. Another thing that needs to be considered is that the figures could well be false, the reason this is, is that the police might have wanted to look as if they were working as wished-for so they do not lose their jobs or even get a additional benefit. The demand for alcohol was rising and the gangsters were simply running a flourishing business. Prohibition had failed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History - Prohibition

    1929 saw the end of the gangster era. They had made millions during the 1920s through the sale of illegal alcohol. The end of this era came as a result of the population's awareness of the extent of violence these gangsters were willing to use to get what they wanted.

  2. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    increased to 12,023 in 1925, and then later increased to 15,794 in 1929. This shows that the police were doing their job as more people were being caught. These are actual figures produced by the Federal Government. This shows a success as Prohibition is being enforced with effect.

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    This will give difference in reliability as evidence of Prohibition. Source E was written by John D. Rockefeller, who was a wealthy industrialist who would have been for Prohibition as many industrialists believed that alcohol made their workers inefficient. Source E is reliable as it shows hoe many promoters of Prohibition changed their minds during the end of Prohibition.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    arrested for committing this offence in Philadelphia, to 645 people in 1923. The same reasons as above could explain this such as more people drinking or even better police work, which I do not think is likely as from studying Prohibition, it seems to me that the police were open to a lot of corruption.

  1. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    Her view was obviously influenced by her job, as she was expected to honour Roosevelt for what he had achieved: 'The New Deal meant that ordinary people would have a better chance in life.' She emphasises on the fact that 'ordinary people' were helped by the New Deal, and this had been its aim.

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    Newspapers were often involved in a political issues and offer a personal point of view and this may be an anti-prohibition source where bribery could be involved. Newspapers also try to exaggerate obviously to sell the paper. One other reason why newspapers are unreliable is that it tends to condense information and may then distort what actually happened.

  1. Study Sources G and H, Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    Also the date is from the time of Prohibition, meaning it is a contemporary source. However stills and spirits were still being seized at an increasing rate meaning the public were ignoring the law and breaking it.

  2. Study sources G and H. Do these sources prove that prohibition was successful?

    Therefore Source G proves that Prohibition was not successful and was a complete failure because it shows an increase in illegal stills and gallons of spirit seized which means increase in production.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work