• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...


Study sources G and H. Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful? (8) Prohibition was introduced in 1919. The aims of Prohibition were very explicit and they were that no alcohol should be consumed or sold in the USA. This essay will set out to show that Prohibition did not accomplish its aims and therefore, was not successful. I hope to prove this during the course of this essay that Prohibition was unsuccessful. Source G shows that the number of illegal stills seized in America increased rapidly between 1921 and 1929. In 1921 the number of illegal stills seized was 9,746, increasing to 12,023 in 1925 and further increasing to 15,749 in 1929. The story and the trend is the same with the gallons of spirits seized. It went from 414,000 in 1921, increasing to 11,030,000 and increasing further to 11,860,00 in 1929. This was produced by the Federal government concerning the nation. At face value this shows that the police and the Federal government were doing their jobs well by seizing illegal alcohol. This shows that they were successful. Source H shows that the number of drunks arrested increased between 1920 and 1925. In 1920, one year after the Volstead Act, there were 14,313 drunks, increasing to 45,226 in 1923 and further to 51,361 in 1925. ...read more.


However, Source G may not have been as conclusive as that at face value. This could be the case because one needs to know other things in order to make a conclusion as to whether this source is reliable. The additional information that is required is how many illegal stills or gallons of spirits were there in the country at the time. Without this there cannot be a conclusion made because if there were a million illegal stills and only 15,749 were seized in 1929, then the police did not do well, but if there were only 20,000 stills in the country then the police would have done well. However, this information will never be known as nobody kept a record of it as it was an illegal activity, but from my own knowledge, I know that there was a lot of illegal alcohol in the country, far more than the police seized. This is the same case with source H, because no one knows what the total population of Philadelphia was at the time or if Philadelphia was a good or bad state as far as Prohibition goes. Other reasons for inaccuracies in the sources could be the fact that in both sources the figures could have been tampered with in order to make them look good to the people or government officials to show that the Prohibition commissioners and the police were doing their jobs well. ...read more.


Source I shows all the influential officials and officers sticking their hands out behind their backs. This shows that they are asking for bribes. Source J also shows corruption because it shows that there was a conspiracy involving senior officials. It says 'It was a conspiracy and my superior officers were involved in it'. It also shows that officers were receiving bribes. It says 'I opened it and there was $75 in it'. All this means that nobody can tell, solely from looking at these sources, how reliable these sources were, as corruption may have caused the statistics to be changed. In conclusion, I feel that these sources cannot prove that Prohibition was a success. It does show that the police were doing a better job, but without additional information one cannot make a conclusion and therefore, cannot say whether or not the sources prove that Prohibition was successful or not. The other additional information that is needed is the fact of how much alcohol was actually made in the country. Also, other information that is needed is for source H, as no one knows what sort of Prohibition record Philadelphia had. They could have been the worst state for Prohibition or they could have been the best. So, without this additional information, nothing can be proven and therefore, there can be no conclusion reached as to the success of Prohibition in America. Abbas Tejani Prohibition part (d) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition - source related study.

    "So many Americans" if there were so many Americans against prohibition, why was it brought in, because if a law doesn't have backing and real enforcement then it is not going to be a success. Also this law is slightly impinges the Constitution, as it interferes with the "customs and desires of many Americans".

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    He also states that liquor must not be manufactured and that, as an enforcer of this law, Mr Kramer says that they shall ensure that it is not. Although we are aware that Prohibition failed and all his aims were not met, it does not make the source less reliable.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    would have found Capone 'Public Enemy Number One' as he was a figurehead in maintaining America had a supply of alcohol. Al Capone made over $60 million a year from selling illegal alcohol and in 1925 alone 200 million gallons of spirits were sold, 685 million gallons of malt liquor

  2. Study Sources G and H, Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    Also the high increase of incidents of drunk driving may mean the police were accomplishing more and were doing their best. But then there are lots of reasons why it proves Prohibition was unsuccessful such as the majority of drink related crimes increased: Drunk increased from 14,313 in 1920 to

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The had bold titles and pictures to show it.They were good pieces of propaganda. Sources E and F John D Rockefeller Jr was a wealth industrialist and lived through prohibition. The source was written in 1931, which was the time of prohibition; just before it ended.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    a reason but just stated that "historians disagree" though they do suggest the same groups were the people who had the influence to enforce it. (b) The two posters were produced before Prohibition was enforced. This would mean that they were probably produced to persuade people to vote for Prohibition.

  1. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    propaganda to show how well the government was doing, or a warning to anyone who had large amounts of alcohol in their possession. The source does tell us that the American government did face problems with the new enforced laws of prohibition, illegal bars were in use and many agents were employed.

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    The government had to take matters into their own hands due to these problems, so they introduced prohibition hoping that all the problems would go away, but they had another thing coming. What angers familes and The Anti-Saloon League is the health hazards in alcahol and violence which resorts from it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work