• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...


Study sources G and H. Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful? (8) Prohibition was introduced in 1919. The aims of Prohibition were very explicit and they were that no alcohol should be consumed or sold in the USA. This essay will set out to show that Prohibition did not accomplish its aims and therefore, was not successful. I hope to prove this during the course of this essay that Prohibition was unsuccessful. Source G shows that the number of illegal stills seized in America increased rapidly between 1921 and 1929. In 1921 the number of illegal stills seized was 9,746, increasing to 12,023 in 1925 and further increasing to 15,749 in 1929. The story and the trend is the same with the gallons of spirits seized. It went from 414,000 in 1921, increasing to 11,030,000 and increasing further to 11,860,00 in 1929. This was produced by the Federal government concerning the nation. At face value this shows that the police and the Federal government were doing their jobs well by seizing illegal alcohol. This shows that they were successful. Source H shows that the number of drunks arrested increased between 1920 and 1925. In 1920, one year after the Volstead Act, there were 14,313 drunks, increasing to 45,226 in 1923 and further to 51,361 in 1925. ...read more.


However, Source G may not have been as conclusive as that at face value. This could be the case because one needs to know other things in order to make a conclusion as to whether this source is reliable. The additional information that is required is how many illegal stills or gallons of spirits were there in the country at the time. Without this there cannot be a conclusion made because if there were a million illegal stills and only 15,749 were seized in 1929, then the police did not do well, but if there were only 20,000 stills in the country then the police would have done well. However, this information will never be known as nobody kept a record of it as it was an illegal activity, but from my own knowledge, I know that there was a lot of illegal alcohol in the country, far more than the police seized. This is the same case with source H, because no one knows what the total population of Philadelphia was at the time or if Philadelphia was a good or bad state as far as Prohibition goes. Other reasons for inaccuracies in the sources could be the fact that in both sources the figures could have been tampered with in order to make them look good to the people or government officials to show that the Prohibition commissioners and the police were doing their jobs well. ...read more.


Source I shows all the influential officials and officers sticking their hands out behind their backs. This shows that they are asking for bribes. Source J also shows corruption because it shows that there was a conspiracy involving senior officials. It says 'It was a conspiracy and my superior officers were involved in it'. It also shows that officers were receiving bribes. It says 'I opened it and there was $75 in it'. All this means that nobody can tell, solely from looking at these sources, how reliable these sources were, as corruption may have caused the statistics to be changed. In conclusion, I feel that these sources cannot prove that Prohibition was a success. It does show that the police were doing a better job, but without additional information one cannot make a conclusion and therefore, cannot say whether or not the sources prove that Prohibition was successful or not. The other additional information that is needed is the fact of how much alcohol was actually made in the country. Also, other information that is needed is for source H, as no one knows what sort of Prohibition record Philadelphia had. They could have been the worst state for Prohibition or they could have been the best. So, without this additional information, nothing can be proven and therefore, there can be no conclusion reached as to the success of Prohibition in America. Abbas Tejani Prohibition part (d) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    Prohibition was a major event that changed the American economy greatly. There were many changes that took place during prohibition. Prohibition was meant to reduce the crime rate, reduce tax, solve the problems of society, and improve the hygiene and health in America.

  2. Depth study USA.

    Their relationships with men were strictly controlled. The had to had a chaperone with them when they went out with a boyfriend. The were expected not to take part in sport or to smoke in public. In most states they could not vote. Most of them were expected to be housewives.

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Source C infers that the man is "Slaves of the Saloon" which is very powerful Prohibition message as it affects the men and the women. It also implies that the men are forced to go there and they are doing this against their will, which would give cause for the saloons to be shut down.

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    It does'nt specify a date which could again suggest that it could of been taken yearlier. What's intresting about both sources is that they both show an illegal activity being done while a camera is taking a picture. Source D is showing the job of a bar keeper in a

  1. History - Prohibition

    In summary, Source I does prove that source J is telling the truth. Although source I does not explain how the gangsters managed to persuade the law enforcers to accept their bribes, it does reinforce the idea that these officials were corrupt and that bribery was used as a way of introducing alcohol into the country.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    The author is objective about Prohibition, and in this way his letter can be considered reliable. As well as this, the author goes on to describe the negative consequences of Prohibition, 'the speakeasy has replaced the saloon' and 'a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared'.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    People want to help vulnerable people especially children. This aspect appeals to people's love for children and their desire to protect them. It is clever how this poster combines both images, the family at home and the husband spending the money the family sorely needs. Just above the picture of the family there is a caption.

  2. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    The historian also comments on how Roosevelt had become a dictator or was trying to. It is obvious that both people had very different views on Roosevelt and have completely opposite views on Roosevelt 3) Source D has a poster of a typical middle class white family driving a car.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work