• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources G and H, Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...


Question D Study Sources G and H, Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful? Source G shows that Prohibition was successful to an extent. There are numerous reasons that show that Prohibition was successful such as, the figures of illegal spirits seized increased dramatically from 1921 where the number was 414,000 to 11,030,000 in 1925 and even further by 1929 where the number was 11,860,000. These figures show that the Prohibition officers were determined to carry out their task of enforcing the law. Also the number increased from 11,030,000 to only 11,860,000 between 1925 and 1929 which shows a significant decrease of spirits seized than between 1921 and 1925. ...read more.


If Prohibition was working then there shouldn't have been nearly as much alcohol being produced. Also had they had more agents they might have seized a huge amount more of each because we don't know how much there was out there. These statistics were given by Federal agents and from my own knowledge I know that some Federal agents were corrupted and bribed so you don't know if you this source is trustworthy. Also from my own knowledge I know that by 1929 the majority of the public were openly drinking alcohol in their own homes, even the president! Also this data is typical of a Federal government agency that was under pressure to enforce Prohibition and was failing to do so. ...read more.


This indicates that more and more people were ignoring the law. These statistics don't inform us as to why Prohibition was failing but from my own knowledge I know it was because of the gangsters, crime, corruption and bribes. Also from my own knowledge I know that police departments were corrupt especially in big cities like Chicago that were hit hard by the organised crime. Therefore we can't trust these statistics, as they might be even worse than these. In conclusion I believe that neither sources proves Prohibition was a success or not. Both have good and bad points and for source H especially, you can't say whether it was successful or not because the figures are from one police department. Those statistics do not represent Prohibition for the whole of America. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matt Molyneux ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Was the New Deal successful? - source related study

    3 Source D is by a photographer in 1937. It shows black people queuing for government relief in front of a poster, which says: 'World's Highest Standard of Living' and 'There's No Way like the American Way'. The poster depicts a rich white family in a car.

  2. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    I don't know who took the photograph, but I do know that it is a primary source, because it was taken during the 1920's. This particular source was taken to show agents for prohibition after a speakeasy. This particular photograph looks very artificial, as it might have been used as

  1. Roosevelt Sources Question

    because source J is made by a business speaking in 1980 he says that Roosevelt gave to people rather than teaching them how to gain. He says that people then got used to not having to work so hard and so they just expected to get from Roosevelt.

  2. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    The City of Philadelphia published this Source. The statistics show that Prohibition was a success as the police had improved and become better and were catching more people. However, it also showed failure as more people were breaking the law. Both the sources show that Prohibition was successful as they show that the police were doing their jobs better by arresting.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    My own knowledge tells me that policeman were often corrupt and therefore the policeman's words may not be reliable, completely bringing down the reliability of the whole source. When discussing how far Source I proves that the policeman in Source J is telling the truth, there are reasons to suggest it does prove and reasons to suggest it doesn't.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    It also reflects the phrase "Paying his dues" which implies that he owes the bartender this money in return for some alcohol. This poster is for Prohibition as its message is against alcohol. Source D also pictures a saloon, but it is the outside with two children looking hopefully in.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    If this happens, the family will still not have enough money. Then when he returns to work, he is likely to go to the saloon again and spend his wages and the cycle happens again. If it happens enough, the man could lose his job and then the family would be in real difficulty.

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    John D. Rockefeller put huge amounts of money towards the prohibition campaign - $350,000 before 1920 and $75,000 a year afterwards. This evidence does not contain personal opinions and seems factual, so it appears to be valid and accurate. 3)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work