• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources I & J. To what extent do the two maps in source J’s views that the German method of defence was well suited to the terrain while the British method of attack was unsuitable? Explain your Answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Sources I & J. To what extent do the two maps in source J's views that the German method of defence was well suited to the terrain while the British method of attack was unsuitable? Explain your Answer. All of the sources that I have studied all have a different view of the situation in had but they are all still portraying the same theme of the conditions of the battle field and the Germans advantages over the British. Even though, they still have been unable to show some things that the other sources have been able to. After looking at the sources I can see that they have shown the German advantages over Britain in all of the maps and in source J. ...read more.

Middle

The Germans have used the land here very well, because of the land terrain the British would funnel through the narrow gap of dry lad and this would be an easier target for the German machine gun. Also the Germans were also ready for the British attacks so they were always prepared for the attack before the British were. "... two months passed before preparations for the main advance were completed" This was due to the un organisation of the British during this period of time. The British have also had any other disadvantages because of they're attack. A shown in the maps they are having to advance uphill through waterlogged and flooded terrain. Because of the Germans strategic positioning of the pill boxes the British were sitting ducks foe the Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source J can also tell us things that may not be able to be shown on the map. An example of this would be that source J speaks of the pill boxes all along the German defence line but because of the map scale they can not show this, and therefore they cannot give a complete picture of the situation. After analysing all of the sources I have come to the decision that the sources all maps in source I have reinforced the view of J. Which is that the Germans had all of the advantages of being on higher ground and being dug in well and Britain had all of the disadvantages of being attacking up hill and attacking over flooded and waterlogged terrain. This is why source I does prove sources J's view that the German method of defence was well suited to the terrain while the British method of attack was unsuitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. To what extent was appeasement justified?

    Nonetheless, the fact that Britain appeased Hitler meant that it abandoned millions of Austrians and Czechs to the vicious Nazi terror. This also meant that they lost trust of everyone including their allies. It sent the message to everyone that Britain and France would not stand in Hitler's way of his wrong-doings.

  2. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    The source may not be entirely correct as all the numbers appear to be rounded up or down to multiples of a thousand, but this does not make much difference when looking to it as evidence of general female employment.

  1. History: assignment two

    hospitals and factories but if they became nurses, provider of refreshments and brought up fighting men of the future, still, the same attitude women must be mothers and wife's. The right to vote for women was not because they had earned it but as a reward for their help.

  2. Haig in sources

    He knew that the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) would have a large number of casualties. Before the battle he wrote, "...the nation must be prepared to see a heavy casualty lists," but he did not know how many would die.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work