• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

success of evacuation

Extracts from this document...


Evacuee's coursework - Afnan khokhar 10B1 - Question 3 draft Q3. 'Evacuation was a great success do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. Evacuation was the process in which one and a half million children including pregnant women and disabled people were evacuated from major cities. Like London to the countryside also known as the reception areas so they could be safe from the bombings. Bombing was mainly expected in the major cities so it was a good idea to move the future generation to a place where bombing was not expected. Bombing was introduced because the British were being bombed by the Germans during the Second World War. In the major cities there was all type off different classes. Mostly the lower class and the middle class were evacuated whereas the higher class in the cities went and lived in their countryside home which belonged to them. The period of time that the evacuees stayed away from home varied from time to time. Some people stayed with foster carers for 2 to 3 moths and went back because there was no bombing however some people stayed with the foster cares for a long time up to six years. The word 'success' has many meanings, the most common meaning being, to achieve your goals or aims. Evacuation also had its success and failures. The main success of evacuation is that it saved many children's lives which allowed us to have another generation after the war; however the fails of evacuation were that ...read more.


Source C talks about children being evacuated and also about how they and their mothers felt. The interview took place in 1988 making it a secondary source because it was written after evacuation took place. Because the interview was taken after a long time after evacuation it may be unreliable because her views may be affected by hindsight, the source may also be unreliable because it is one persons point of view. Looking at source C I can learn that it shows the evacuation was a failure. 'Children were too afraid too talk. . . . . . . We hadn't the slightest idea where we were going. . . . . . The mothers pressed against the iron gates calling goodbye darling.' From this I can learn the children were not comfortable because they were too afraid too talk. I can also learn that there was lack organisation because no one knew where they were going. This source is an objective source because e in the source it does state about the source being on time. Overall source C shows that evacuation was a failure. The main purpose of the source was to show how children and mothers felt about evacuation. Source 'E' is also an interview with a mother of the host family. The mother looks back and remembers what the evacuees were like. 'The children went around urinating on the walls; although we had toilets they never used them.' From this we can learn that the evacuees had very poor hygiene. ...read more.


Source H is a primary source as it was published in 1940, at the time of evacuation. The advert also has text and in the text it uses facts to get people to foster children. The text is also written in a way so it makes you feel sympathy for the evacuees, 'You may be saving a child's life.' Many people believe that evacuation was a success and many others believe that it was a failure. Well, evacuation was a success for mothers because their children's lives were saved, however they did not know where they where going and when they will be back. Evacuation was definitely a success for children because most importantly it saved their lives and they got to witness what the countryside looked like for the first time; however they had much trouble bonding with the foster carers. Evacuation was a success for foster carers because they were paid a good amount of money on the other hand they also had difficulty bonding with the evacuees because of the class difference. I believe that evacuation was a success for the government because they were responsible for saving one and a half million peoples lives by transporting them to the countryside, however they did a bad job with the distribution of children. Overall I believe that evacuation was definitely a success because it saved nearly one and half million children's lives which allowed us to have another generation after the war. Even though there were many negatives about evacuation I still believe that the life of children is far more precious than the bonding of two different classes. Thanks to evacuation we were able to have another generation after the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role. ...

    this poster because of the times they were in and if you look at posters before the war then they are in traditional roles. But what about other roles women had to take? Women had to take a large non-traditional role I the armed forces so there is evidence to suggest that DeMarco's view is incorrect.

  2. In what ways were the lives of children on the home front affected by ...

    This source is reliable because it was made during the time, shows a positive affect of the Blitz on children and also shows how boys were perceived as the father of the family. However it's not reliable because we don't know when it was produced, it is a general overview

  1. Stoke Bruerne: Canal lives

    Source G is from a description of the village of Stoke Bruerne, written by a pupil at Stoke Bruerne School in 1902. This source is very beneficial and useful in talking about the village in detail. In the source many things are mentioned, such as: the boat keepers and the

  2. Evacuation was a success

    = 86 x 60 = 4.3 � 4 � 5 1183 1183 I have to sample 5 girls instead of 4 girls from year 11. This is because I had a total of 59 instead of 60 which must have been because some figures were rounded up or down.

  1. Evacuation was a Great Success

    A very positive thing that came out of the evacuation was the welfare state and it could be argued that it was the biggest positive outcome of the war. Many foster parents that took in children from slums and poor areas were shocked at the state these children had been living in and complained to the government.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    As it is a picture it can also be reliable as it shows visual images of evacuees as It was based around the time of the war, however through other sources it says some information about women not going with them to the train station, but as you can see

  1. How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain ...

    As people became to understand that there suffering was not inevitable then of course they wanted things to be changed for the better, however the rigid and archaic nature of the governing state could not allow for these changes. The circulation of innovative scientific ideas and criticisms of the church

  2. History Evacuation Coursework

    Also, during the Spanish civil war, Hitler backed the nationalists and used the Luftwaffe to bomb the town of Guernica, where it was market day and the casualties were higher. The casualties of the bombing of Guernica made the British evacuate children because they were so worried because 70% of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work