• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

sufferage campaign

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different. The campaign to win the vote for women in Britain first began in the 1850's. The suffragists and the suffragettes, although using the same ultimate goal, which was to win the vote for women, used different methods to campaign. The NUWSS known as the suffragists used peaceful methods to campaign. However even though the suffragettes aimed for a similar goal they used a completely new tactic to get what they wanted. The WSPU known as the suffragettes used violent methods to campaign. In this essay I will discuss the ways in which the techniques of campaigning of the suffragists and suffragettes were different and how effective they were for their campaign. By the late 19th century there were many meetings held by local groups all over the country to give women the vote. The campaigners consisted mainly of middle class women. Then in 1890 hundreds of local groups got together and later called themselves the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS). They were known as the suffragists. The group was led by a woman called Millicent Fawcett. Fawcett believed in peaceful methods of campaigning. ...read more.

Middle

They were then nicknamed the suffragettes. Now unlike the NUWSS the WSPU decided to use violent methods to campaign as the peaceful, legal methods were not getting anyone's attention. The WSPU not only campaigned for votes for women like the NUWSS but also for better working and living conditions for women. Sylvia Pankhurst described their aims "to create an impression on the public and to set everyone talking about votes for women, to keep the subject on the press and leave the government no peace from it." So the main aim of the suffragettes was to get the subject about women's suffrage back as main news, which is what they did using some of their very violent tactics. The WSPU had a motto, which was "deeds not words" and so unlike the suffragists who only talked about the issues, the suffragettes acted upon their motto by heckling at meetings by attacking cabinet ministers and deliberately getting themselves arrested and sent to prison, so that they could grab the attention of the public and the government again like they intended to, which they did, because soon the campaign for women's vote was important news again, as the papers started taking notice of them. ...read more.

Conclusion

However when MPs tried to introduce women's suffrage to the Bill, they were told that this changed the account of the bill, so much so it would have to be withdrawn. This angered so many supporters of the women's suffrage and the suffragettes increased their use of violence. They started to organise more window smashing and then they went to extreme lengths by carrying out arson and bombing places and sabotage in many places in Britain. This started to lose the support of many MPs who had supported the campaign in the past and it also gave Asquith who was already against women's suffrage not to give in. However the NUWSS worked hard to win back the support of the public. They made membership free and by 1914 over 50,000 more women had joined Mrs. Fawcett's campaign. But none the less the situation looked almost hopeless. The suffragists and suffragettes both had the same aim in their campaign however their use of methods to campaign made them different. The suffragists used peaceful moderate law abiding methods to campaign. However the suffragettes used more violent illegal methods, which were more effective because the peaceful methods were too slow and did not attract any attention. So the WSPU saw violence as the only answer to attract attention of the government. This is what made the two organisations different from each other. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    Emily Davison joined the suffragettes in 1906 and this is her prison record below: March 30th 1909 One month in prison for obstruction July 30th 1909 Two months in prison for obstruction September 4th 1909 Two months for stone throwing at White City, Manchester October 20th 1909 One month for

  2. Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    Overall we can see that the act was successful as the free medical inspections and treatment insured that they received good and accurate prescriptions and were nursed back to full health, which meant they could find jobs and earn a decent income.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    publicity was repeated when Mrs Pankhurst made a scene in the Ladies Gallery of the House of Commons. This contrasts when a group of suffragists arranged a meeting with the Prime minister in May 1908 in order to urge him to support their cause.

  2. Emily Wilding Davison

    This shows that to Emily Davison the wspu was her pride and joy to show everybody who she was - like a form of identity. A suffragette fighting for her cause without tragedy. However tragedy happened as her friend says she did not know if Emily changed her mind to a more dramatic protest of bravery and heroism.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragettes and suffragists were different.

    The two main Women's Rights groups in the U.K. were WSPU (who were suffragettes and NUWSS (who were suffragists) which were completely different to each other. But how were they different? The leaders if these two societies were also completely different in how they thought the problem of women being

  2. How Did the Views and the Arguments put forward by Supporters and opponents of ...

    Immigrants were seen as a potent threat to the Klan and maybe America and believed they wanted to take over America. Immigrants would argue that Anglo-White Saxons were just as immigrants as anyone else in America, this is due to the Native Americans being there first and white's arriving later.

  1. Why did a campaign for womens suffrage develop in the years after 1870s?

    19th century were very significant as they had an impact on women and their desire to vote. This is portrayed by the change in attitude of women's suffrage campaigners when most men were given the vote but only some women could vote in the local elections.

  2. Millicent Garrett Fawcett

    she sees money as a solution to the problems of Mrs Johnstone. Mrs Lyons is also portrayed as a cold woman who doesn't show much emotion. She is very over-protective of Eddie and fears his bond with the Johnstones. Later in the play this fear becomes more evident and she

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work