• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Suffragettes - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


Suffragettes coursework Lester Pitts Source A shows that woman can have responsible jobs in society but not have the vote. For example, a woman can be a doctor or teacher, and for these jobs they would have to be well educated and very responsible but still not be allowed the vote. On the other hand, a man can be a convict or drunkard but still have the vote. The overall message of source A is that suffragettes believed the voting system was unfair, and that women fully deserved the vote. Sources B and C support each other in a number of ways. One way is that they are both against suffragettes. We know this because source B is called 'woman or suffragette.' Which means that you can't be both and if you aren't a woman you aren't normal. In a similar way, source C shows an old woman looking mad and distorted, with a deranged facial expression being held back by a normal looking woman. The woman is saying to the suffragette 'YOU help our cause? Why you're it's worst enemy.' This is portraying the suffragettes as really bad people and they don't help the cause of getting women the vote. Another example of how they are similar language to describe suffragettes in a bad way. Source B says 'Shrill cry' and Source C says 'Shrieking sister' these words are used to show that suffragettes are hysterical. ...read more.


I also know from my own knowledge that there were other factors which stopped women from getting the vote. One of these factors was that they were considered to be intellectually inferior. People thought that women didn't know about politics and thought that they would only vote for the most handsome candidate. Another reason they didn't get the vote is that they wanted the same rights as men. The Liberals didn't want this because men were the householders and were more likely to be middle class and therefore more likely to vote Conservative. Also, they didn't get the vote because they had never contributed to a war they didn't deserve it. It can be seen that there were a number of different reasons which helps to explain why women had not got the vote by nineteen fourteen. Source F is a poster showing a woman in a munitions factory. It is propaganda produced by the Government in which it shows a woman working and looking clean and contented. This is unlikely to be a realistic picture, because work in the munitions factory was hard physical labour. It is very biased because it is trying to get women to enroll in the munitions industry. Even though it is biased it is still useful because it tells us that the Government needed munitions workers during the war as the men that usually did this work were fighting the war. ...read more.


Not all people were happy with the idea of women doing work that was usually done by men. An example of this is in source H which says 'in farm's, hospitals and factories they were greatly resented,' and 'men felt happiest if women became nurses or providers of refreshments for the troops.' However, their contribution to the war wasn't the only reason they got the vote as said in source I. 'To say that the war brought votes for women is to make a very rough generalization.' One of the other reasons was that the suffragettes had stopped their campaign of violence. People were keen to avoid it restarting and so they supported votes for women. Also the Government was now able to give women the vote without looking as though they had given in to pressure, which would make them look weak. Also after the war a lot of men were wounded and injured people couldn't vote. The Government thought it would be better to change the law to allow the injured to vote and so it was good timing to allow women to vote as well. In conclusion I partly agree with the statement 'It was the work that women did during the war that earned them the vote.' It cannot be denied that women's work during the war changed men's attitudes towards them, however there were other important factors that contributed, such as their end to violence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    This is illustrated in source C, where it depicts people struggling in knee high mud. This source is corroborated by source D (I); this states 'conditions, mud, cold, rain...' However, Haig had a number of positive attributes as a leader.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    This was the German naval policy. The Germans announced that they would sink any ship without warning. Their aim was to starve Britain into surrender by sinking all the supply ships bringing in food and weapons. The most famous sinking was by a German submarine on of the British passenger liner Lusitania on May 7.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    It depicts two women, one a suffragette, and one a suffragist outside a liberal meeting; the suffragette is holding a banner saying 'female suffrage' the suffragist is saying to the suffragette 'YOU help our cause? Why, you're its worst enemy!'

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    Therefore they give a dissimilar impression of the 1st day of the battle of the Somme. From both sources you can gather that the 1st day of The Somme didn't go to plan. General Rawlingson said, "Nothing can exist in the area covered" by the bombardment, but why then was the German eyewitness able to quote on the battle?

  1. The 1913 Derby - source related study.

    These two sources differ in their accounts of what happened at the derby in 1913, because two people with different opinions wrote them. D was written by a lady who was passionate about the suffragette movement and everything to do with it and E is written by a reporter who

  2. The Derby 1913 - source related study.

    This photograph is also a primary source, and not bias, so like source B it is totally reliable. This shot shows the massive crowds, making it easier for us to understand why Emily chose the Derby to stage her protest, and the publicity the suffragette movement would receive.

  1. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    An example of this is in a letter to The Times by Dr Almroth Wright on 27th March 1912. Wright was a doctor at St Mary's Hospital in London and claimed the "militant suffragists" were merely "sexually embittered women." Whilst angering the women further, many others agreed with Wright's point and it was the attitude of many MP's.

  2. The 1913 Derby - Source related study.

    She was single minded and did not care how her suicide might effect others around her. Once she had decided to kill herself she was always looking for ways to do it even if the attempt failed she would be very badly hurt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work