• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1905 revolution was primarily a result of the economic depression rather than the failings of the Tsar, how far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The 1905 revolution was primarily a result of the economic depression rather than the failings of the Tsar", how far do you agree with this statement? Russia's industry had grown at an enormous rate since 1890 but in 1899 Russia was hit with a huge depression that produced widespread unemployment and urban discontent. Towards the end of 1902 and through early 1903, there were widespread mass strikes throughout the major cities in the country. During the lead up to 1905 the economic depression in Russia played a large part in the attempted revolution. Clearly, however it must be remembered that it was not enough on its own to cause the events of 1905 but it is its inter-relationship with other elements in Russian society that explain why there was an attempt at revolution in 1905. ...read more.

Middle

Even worse for the government was that the war meant that inflation rose rapidly causing prices to rise. The war was in addition causing food shortages and the lack of materials meant that many factories had to close making many workers unemployed As well as the weakness of the regime, and the growth of political opposition, there were many events in Russia, which brewed discontent. By 1905, there were several long-term problems that had come to light. By allowing the peasantry to migrate and marry, Alexander II caused the Russian population to nearly double from 76 million in 1861 to 140 million in 1905. This increase in population put a strain on the land, so by 1901 the average peasant land holdings fell by 20%. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Nicholas II was opposed to reform as he did not wish to weaken his position, he did, however, push for the industrialization of Russia as he believed it would end the urban discontent and unrest. All it succeeded in doing was worsening the situation as the benefits of the increases in productivity benefited an elite, the workers; on the other hand, saw no reward for their hard work, a system reminiscent of the times of serfdom. The economic depression and the failings of the tsar are both crucial elements of the 1905 revolution. Nicholas II's rule resulted in poor social, economic and working conditions and his fear of reform resulted in a depression. The revolution was brought about by the revolutionaries created by the tsarist regime. An autocratic regime that resulted in squalid conditions for the poor, breeding grounds for social discontent and revolutionary thought. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How far did the 1905 revolution weaken then Tsarist regime?

    The Tsar made concessions to gain back support, however this made the Tsar look weak and that the tsarist regime was under threat. The October Manifesto, the Tsar allowed the formation of an elected legislative assembly, the Duma. Technically, this would mean that the Tsar had to share his autocratic

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    On 22nd January 1905, about two hundred thousand people led by Father Gapon marched to The Tsar's winter palace in St Petersburg, carrying pictures of him and singing hymns, to ask him to improve things for them. However, the Tsar was not in St Petersburg and the marchers' way was blocked by troops.

  1. Assess the idea that is the ideologies, which emerge from the French revolution, rather ...

    This was to be proven a major error in his thinking. "The third Estate took a decisive revolutionary step by proclaiming its conversion into a National Assembly". (C/H French revolution). The Royal government, knew at this early stage they were getting nowhere, and there was to be no turning back for these newly empowered people.

  2. What Were The Causes of The1905 Revolution & TheConsequences of The Uprising?

    His Russification policy forced Russian culture on the 50 million non-Russians in the empire. The Jews also suffered greatly under his reign as Pogroms were organised attacks on the Jews which forced many to emigrate. Censorship was also increased and the freedom of universities was reduced.

  1. Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution ...

    In total there were four dumas: * The first Duma, April - June 1906 * The Second Duma, Feb - June 1907 * The Third Duma, Nov 1907 - June 1912 * The Fourth Duma, Nov 1912 - Aug 1914 The Duma "era" showed Russian people that the Tsar was

  2. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    Also , they were often found collapsed asleep on the factory floor after working for fourteen hours a day with insufficient breaks of rest or meals everyday.In addition to this , pregnant women or those with new-born had little difference in their working condition but persevered with hem since they had to finance their families .

  1. How far do you agree that the 1905 revolution was a revolution without revolutionaries?

    Chekhov described the peasants in 1897 "... these people lived worse than cattle... The most insignificant little clerk or official treated the peasants as though they were tramps, and addressed even the village elders and church wardens as inferiors, and as though he had a right to do so."

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    It is not surprising therefore that Russia did not launch a full-scale drive to industrialise until the 1890's. Ivan Vyshnegradsky attempted to drive Russia forward by increasing its exports and imports. This initially had the desired effect however it put a lot of pressure on the peasantry and in 1891-2

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work