• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1905 revolution was primarily a result of the economic depression rather than the failings of the Tsar, how far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The 1905 revolution was primarily a result of the economic depression rather than the failings of the Tsar", how far do you agree with this statement? Russia's industry had grown at an enormous rate since 1890 but in 1899 Russia was hit with a huge depression that produced widespread unemployment and urban discontent. Towards the end of 1902 and through early 1903, there were widespread mass strikes throughout the major cities in the country. During the lead up to 1905 the economic depression in Russia played a large part in the attempted revolution. Clearly, however it must be remembered that it was not enough on its own to cause the events of 1905 but it is its inter-relationship with other elements in Russian society that explain why there was an attempt at revolution in 1905. ...read more.

Middle

Even worse for the government was that the war meant that inflation rose rapidly causing prices to rise. The war was in addition causing food shortages and the lack of materials meant that many factories had to close making many workers unemployed As well as the weakness of the regime, and the growth of political opposition, there were many events in Russia, which brewed discontent. By 1905, there were several long-term problems that had come to light. By allowing the peasantry to migrate and marry, Alexander II caused the Russian population to nearly double from 76 million in 1861 to 140 million in 1905. This increase in population put a strain on the land, so by 1901 the average peasant land holdings fell by 20%. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Nicholas II was opposed to reform as he did not wish to weaken his position, he did, however, push for the industrialization of Russia as he believed it would end the urban discontent and unrest. All it succeeded in doing was worsening the situation as the benefits of the increases in productivity benefited an elite, the workers; on the other hand, saw no reward for their hard work, a system reminiscent of the times of serfdom. The economic depression and the failings of the tsar are both crucial elements of the 1905 revolution. Nicholas II's rule resulted in poor social, economic and working conditions and his fear of reform resulted in a depression. The revolution was brought about by the revolutionaries created by the tsarist regime. An autocratic regime that resulted in squalid conditions for the poor, breeding grounds for social discontent and revolutionary thought. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    One of the developments that had influenced the forward movement was the productivity and usefulness of transport . Transportation was vital since in order to send goods to the market and to transport coal and other raw materials , an efficient mode of transport was needed to ensure that the productivity met the demands at a reasonable time .

  2. Assess the idea that is the ideologies, which emerge from the French revolution, rather ...

    This was to be proven a major error in his thinking. "The third Estate took a decisive revolutionary step by proclaiming its conversion into a National Assembly". (C/H French revolution). The Royal government, knew at this early stage they were getting nowhere, and there was to be no turning back for these newly empowered people.

  1. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    They became an important political force in the revolution. They had little success and didn't pose a great threat to the security of tsarist regime or itdidnt't look likely that they would cause a revolution. They led the assassination of Alexander II, which weakened the Populist movement, and this made

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    The peasants were not prepared to fight to defend the Constituent Assembly. By contrast, in the civil war which followed, the majority of the peasants rallied to the Bolsheviks once they had experienced the rule of the White Guards, and saw the role of the right SRs and Mensheviks who invariably paved the way for the White counter-revolution.

  1. How far did the 1905 revolution weaken then Tsarist regime?

    This was a main cause for the loss of support for to the Tsar. Russian society was 80% peasantry, and its agricultural system was backwards and inefficient. The peasants were dissatisfied with the government because they strongly resented land repayments, and they wanted more land.

  2. What Were The Causes of The1905 Revolution & TheConsequences of The Uprising?

    This lack of democracy given to the people was a major cause for the revolution. Alexander III did not agree with his father's reforms and when he came to power in 1881, he set about suppressing the peasants and all opposition to the Tsars.

  1. Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution ...

    However he stopped introducing his reforms as he thought it may cause him to compromise his power. His greater allowance of speech caused the development of intelligentsia who felt betrayed, despairing of Tsardom as a form of change they turned to Revolution.

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    What added to the Russians dislike of her was that she was of German birth and so she was suspected wrongly by many of being a spy of Germany. The Tsarina was also hardly seen in public and she ignored the Duma like her husband.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work