• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1905 revolution was primarily a result of the economic depression rather than the failings of the Tsar, how far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The 1905 revolution was primarily a result of the economic depression rather than the failings of the Tsar", how far do you agree with this statement? Russia's industry had grown at an enormous rate since 1890 but in 1899 Russia was hit with a huge depression that produced widespread unemployment and urban discontent. Towards the end of 1902 and through early 1903, there were widespread mass strikes throughout the major cities in the country. During the lead up to 1905 the economic depression in Russia played a large part in the attempted revolution. Clearly, however it must be remembered that it was not enough on its own to cause the events of 1905 but it is its inter-relationship with other elements in Russian society that explain why there was an attempt at revolution in 1905. ...read more.

Middle

Even worse for the government was that the war meant that inflation rose rapidly causing prices to rise. The war was in addition causing food shortages and the lack of materials meant that many factories had to close making many workers unemployed As well as the weakness of the regime, and the growth of political opposition, there were many events in Russia, which brewed discontent. By 1905, there were several long-term problems that had come to light. By allowing the peasantry to migrate and marry, Alexander II caused the Russian population to nearly double from 76 million in 1861 to 140 million in 1905. This increase in population put a strain on the land, so by 1901 the average peasant land holdings fell by 20%. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Nicholas II was opposed to reform as he did not wish to weaken his position, he did, however, push for the industrialization of Russia as he believed it would end the urban discontent and unrest. All it succeeded in doing was worsening the situation as the benefits of the increases in productivity benefited an elite, the workers; on the other hand, saw no reward for their hard work, a system reminiscent of the times of serfdom. The economic depression and the failings of the tsar are both crucial elements of the 1905 revolution. Nicholas II's rule resulted in poor social, economic and working conditions and his fear of reform resulted in a depression. The revolution was brought about by the revolutionaries created by the tsarist regime. An autocratic regime that resulted in squalid conditions for the poor, breeding grounds for social discontent and revolutionary thought. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    They combined the violent actions of the People's Will (the Narodniks extremist grouping) with attempts to mobilize the peasants into mass action. Promising to return the land to the peasants, their slogan was "All land to the peasants", which obviously made the SRs the most popular party with the peasantry.

  2. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    The major problem was most certainly the sewers since excrement was left open in gutter along the streets due to the placement of sewers . Also , there was no proper disposal of dead bodies and animals and the outcome was that they were simply disposed of in water ways

  1. Assess the idea that is the ideologies, which emerge from the French revolution, rather ...

    This was to be proven a major error in his thinking. "The third Estate took a decisive revolutionary step by proclaiming its conversion into a National Assembly". (C/H French revolution). The Royal government, knew at this early stage they were getting nowhere, and there was to be no turning back for these newly empowered people.

  2. Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution ...

    The final event which "hit the nail on the head" so to speak was the First world war from 1914 to 1918. Russian commitment drained weak Russia and it's weak Tsarist system. WWI opened the eyes of many people, it showed them the inadequacy of the Russian military leadership and the state of Russian supplies.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Not a hand was raised in its defence, precisely because it was an unrepresentative anachronism. The reason for this was very well explained by the celebrated English historian of the Russian Revolution, E.H. Carr: "The SRs had gone to the polls as a single party presenting one list of candidates.

  2. How far did the 1905 revolution weaken then Tsarist regime?

    The consequence of this was that, although many peasants still loved the Tsar, they opposed his government. At the end of the 19th Century, over 36 million Russians were threatened with starvation due to the famine of this time, and the government appeared to be doing nothing to rectify the situation.

  1. What Were The Causes of The1905 Revolution & TheConsequences of The Uprising?

    This lack of democracy given to the people was a major cause for the revolution. Alexander III did not agree with his father's reforms and when he came to power in 1881, he set about suppressing the peasants and all opposition to the Tsars.

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    This did not do much for her image. Another factor which made her even more unpopular was her close relationship with the monk, Rasputin. Rasputin was a highly immoral peasant who claimed to possess spiritual powers and the ability to cure the heir to the throne Alexis, who suffered a fatal condition known as haemophilia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work