• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1920's were just 'an illusion of peace' how far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


The 1920's were just 'an illusion of peace' how far do you agree? After the great war had ended, all of the major powers in the world set out to resolve any problems that had occurred as a result of WW1 and more importantly they wanted to avoid another war. Yet before this could be done, the consequences of the war had to be resolved. The Treaty of Versailles had some strong points and wanted a lot from Germany. Many people thought it was far too harsh on Germany so during the 1920's efforts were made to establish a better relationship with Germany, and help to dampen the devastating effects many terms of the treaty would have caused. This is a good sign that peace was not an illusion but infact a reality. Yet on the other hand it can be seen that the main reason for this relationship was that many politicians were worried that Germany would retaliate from the harsh treatment they had received from the Treaty of Versailles. By 1924 most countries had begun to adapt after the war and began to expect more from Germany. ...read more.


never have been and are not, and probably never will be, sufficiently stable and friendly enough to justify the building of the Channel Tunnel'. This blatently showed that peace was only on the surface. Also at the time, the Locarno Pact was seen as a huge triumph. It showed that Germany had been accepted by the other nations. People talked of the 'Spirit of Lorcano' and Chamberlain, Briand, and Stresseman were awarded the Nobel peace prize for their efforts. On the surface it looked as though peace was to be the enevitable for Europe and it seemed to improve the atmosphere between nations. However, the Locarno Treaty can now be seen differently than at first, for example if peace was to be the future then why in 1927 did france build the Maignot line of defence along the German border? In 1928, even more efforts were made in the attempt to create world-wide peace in the form of the Kellog-Briand Pact. This was a treaty that stated that all the parties that signed 'agreed settlement of all conflicts, no matter of what origin or nature, that might arise among them, should be soughtnly by pacific means and that war was to be renounced as an instrument of national policy.' ...read more.


This brought economic and military benefits to both Russia and Germany. Germany was able to produce and test new weapons in Russia, which was banned in Germany, and Russia received useful German technical expertise. Yet if peace was the future then why did Germany see the need to create and test new weapons? I see this point as an false illusion of peace. In conclusion I think that although Britain was involved in a variety of issues throughout the world it can be argueed that they were mainly only concerned with protecting their own security and improving trade. Most issues that threatened international peace that Britain resolved also benefited Britain in one way or another. In many ways I think the pacts and treaties that were made were just an illusion and seem a little meaningless yet at the time it would have seemed the right thing to do as they could not forsee the future, and see that this slackening of Germany's close watch would lead to another world war. Top of Form Bottom of Form Alex Butcher ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    The problems in England are serious. More industrialization, less agriculture and increasing population in Europe, increasing of note circulation... etc. What is then to be done? Keynes suggests the "Revision of the Treaty", "the settlement of inter-ally indebtedness and an international loan and the reform of the currency and establishing relations between Central Powers to Russia.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The League of Nations divided the region along these lines but it built in safe guards to prevent future disputes. Both countries accepted the decision. This was important, as the League of Nations had to recover from their bad start in Vilna.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Germany had less coal and iron, which she could use. Trade, upon which Germany had formerly relied on, had been dissolved. Families were split up and those who had formerly considered themselves Germans were now classified as French or Polish.

  2. "A study of British foreign policy in the 1920's suggests that British governments increasingly ...

    However most Frenchmen considered the treaty far too soft, they believed Germany was still too economically strong, Clemenceau had been prepared to accept the Versailles terms, only because Wilson and Lloyd George had offered France a defensive alliance. The US senate however, refused to ratify this guarantee and so did the British government.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    The League also strived hard to improve working conditions around the world. The international labour organisation was successful in banning poisonous white lead from paint and in limiting the hours small children were allowed to work. They also introduced a resolution for a maximum 48 hour week and an eight hour day.

  2. To what extent was there stability in Europe in the 1920's

    * Germany accepted that the Rhineland would remain a demilitarized zone. * France and Germany agreed to settle any future disputes through the League of Nations. The Locarno agreements were greeted with terrific enthusiasm and celebrated. The agreements led to Germany to join the League of Nations in 1926.

  1. "The Versailles Peace Settlement failed to secure British Foreign Policy interests"

    Later, when the Whites were almost finished in Russia and the Red Army was advancing on Warsaw, British Prime Minister David Lloyd George negotiated a trade treaty with Bolsheviks in London. The British above all were anxious to demobilize and end conscription.

  2. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    In the Munich Conference, Britain, France, Germany and Italy had hoped to come to an accord, and they did; however Hitler disobeyed the agreement later on and faced no opposition from Britain and France.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work