• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aims of the British army at the Battle of the Somme in 1916.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE History Coursework - Assignment One 1) The aims of the British army at the Battle of the Somme in 1916 were to break through the German front line of trenches and capture enemy territory. To do this successfully they needed to break the stalemate of trench warfare by making a 'big push' or in other words bombard the Germans with shells before going 'over the top' to take over the opposition's trenches. They also wanted to shatter the Germans' morale so that they would not want to fight anymore and hopefully surrender. The British wanted to have a 'big push' so that they could distract the rest of the German army who were fighting the French at Verdun. The French weren't doing so well; they were under heavy bombardment and the Germans were getting closer, even though their motto was 'they shall not pass'. The French were doing so badly that they only had 16 divisions of soldiers left, out of 40 available; but only 5 attacked the Germans compared to 14 of the British. The British Generals thought that if they succeeded in a breakthrough they could then use their cavalry to overcome the German troops. ...read more.

Middle

In this paragraph I will prove that the soldiers were worthy of being described as lions:- Most of the soldiers who fought at the Battle of the Somme were from Lord Kitchener's appeal for troops (i.e. volunteers) and weren't very well trained. However, they always did what they were told, no matter how stupid the orders were and they put up with living in the horrible conditions of the trenches facing death every minute of the day. They did things the generals wouldn't do themselves without complaint and there were no mutinies in all four years of the war. 60,000 of their troops either died or were seriously injured on the first day of the Battle of the Somme but despite this the soldiers did not give up, they kept fighting bravely although it was obvious that as soon as they went 'over the top' they would probably die. When the British were fighting at Gallipoli in Turkey they needed more soldiers so they made an appeal and lots of people signed up; mostly in PALs. These troops were predominantly Australian; they didn't have to go to war because their country wasn't even in it. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, as I will explain next, some historians have praised Haig saying his actions were justified and worthwhile as he won the war in the end. Some historians have a different view. They think that Haig was the best man for the job at the time and that he was right to do what he did. They have praised him and concentrated on 1916 and 1917 when, in their opinion, the British army had had the best offensive they had ever seen. Haig had come from a cavalry regiment but he still had misgivings about the plan which they say make his actions acceptable. They also recognise another good thing in Haig; he saw the advantages of using aircraft and tanks which helped him win the war in the end. Some people must have liked and respected Haig despite his performance at the Somme because when he died, in 1928, more than 30,000 old soldiers attended his funeral. To conclude; yes I do agree with the view expressed by General Ludendorff that the British army was made up of 'lions led by donkeys' because of the reasons I have stated in my answer. Hannah Hardwick VL VEC ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    In these conditions, the allied forces really were facing overwhelming odds. It was not until after the Ludendorff offensive, that the allies started to integrate weapons and tactics into their war strategies. I personally feel that the odds for and against the allies winning the war shifted throughout the war.

  2. "Lions led by donkeys". How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    them that shell fire lifts wire up and drops it down, often in a worse tangle than before". Although many sources agree with "Lions led by donkeys" there is another side to the story where many historians argue that the generals did what had to be done and successfully won the war.

  1. Women & the British Car Industry

    However it could be argued that Collection A disagrees with the statement because advertising is a big part of the car industry and where a big portion of the money goes. Without such advertisements people would not have bought the cars, and so these adverts could be seen as significant.

  2. Source A is a piece of text written by Haig just before the battle ...

    are living lives in a trench, probably suffering from trench foot and feeling homesick. This makes us wonder if Haig has actually visited the men in the front line, because he will find that the "spirits" of his troops are not as "splendid" as he described.

  1. Who was responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli?

    He thought that there was a possibility of knocking Turkey out of the war and even bringing it to an early end. Churchill's enthusiasm won him sufficient support to gain the back up of the Cabinet but the plans were not popular with all concerned and from the start there

  2. Did all of Lord Kitchener's Volunteer army march to war with Zest and Idealism ...

    It tells of what happened when the bombardment lifted from the German front line to their reserve lines. The source touches on the British confidence, or rather, Rawlingson's confidence in his weeklong bombardment of the German lines. "They came on at a steady pace...as though expecting to find nothing alive in our trenches."

  1. Were Lions led by donkeys in World war one?

    This supports the view that lions were led by donkeys because it suggests that George Coppard's 'brave' friends were killed by General Haig wrongly ordering them to go over the top and carry on advancing even though they were being mowed down by the enemy.

  2. The Battle of the Somme: Were Lions led by Donkeys?

    Although small victories were achieved, these land gains couldn?t be successfully followed up. Historians claim that the BEF commander should have learned from the astonishing statistics on the first day of the battle and should have adjusted his tactics but he failed to do so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work