• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

The basic idea of my project is to demonstrate that Colombia's global reputation, drugs and terrorism, has been decaying during the past decade (1990-2000).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Semiotics Project Thesis: Damage to the global reputation of non-USA cultures by Hollywood. Subject: English Presented to: Robert O'Rourke By: Alejandro Holguin Trimester 2 2002-01-29 RATIONALE The basic idea of my project is to demonstrate that Colombia's global reputation, drugs and terrorism, has been decaying during the past decade (1990-2000). My research will be based on getting enough information including specific facts and quotes, which will show how and why is the U.S government and its film industry is responsible for all the damage done to our country's worldwide image. Within the following report, I intend to prove through films, newspaper reports, magazines, and Internet articles, that the U.S�s interest in Colombia is extremely harmful for our image. And that in a non-direct way they are trying to make the world believe that what Colombia needs is military intervention. What I want is to demonstrate the permanent harm that the U.S government is causing to our country. Through out my report Ill show direct facts that prove that Colombia is not the world's most violent country. Even though we produce high amounts of different drugs. There are many drug cartels around Latin America that produce much higher amounts of drugs than the Colombian ones. Colombia has to deal with the worst part of the problem because our drugs are proved to contain the best quality. This is not something to be proud of, but is it really true? Since the start to the end of my project you will be able to see when did this problem begin, with who did it begin and why. You can also see different statements given by experts in the problem in which they give their opinion complemented by certain facts. The significance of this investigation is to express what I think of this problem and to make the readers understand that even though they might not see the content of the films as harmful for Colombia, it is and it should be stopped quickly. ...read more.

Middle

What the USA regrets even more is that they were the ones who trained the Arabs. They were the ones who taught the Arabs everything they know. The purpose of this was to help the Arabs get rid of the Russians, who had invaded their territory. At the time the Arabs became very powerful and got rid of the Russians. But what the U.S�s government never imagined was that the Arabs would use all that power against them later on. This problem has been a lot more recent than the one of the Italians. But has also been a lot worse. The U.S government never acted directly upon this problem. Just up until now that they felt directly threatened with the "World Trade Center" attack. I think that the war against the Arabs had been planned a long time ago. It just hadn't been made public. I would also add to my thoughts; that the USA was waiting for an opportunity like this one, to make the war official. What I can be sure of is that they never imagined that to get the opportunity to do so, would implicate such a disaster. This war against the Arabs has now become social, political and cultural. What makes the situation even worse is the fact that the world will never know what percentage of responsibility does the USA have in all this conflict. It is practically impossible to hear that the USA are the bad guys or at least that they're doing something wrong. The reason is very simple. The U.S news channel bought the only channel able to transmit news about the true situation of the Arabs just before the official war began. A reason for doing this could have been to prevent the release of news that could affect the USA�s image. This was a very intelligent thing to do if we consider the fact that beneath all these lies exists an unknown truth, which could diminish the U.S�s reputation. ...read more.

Conclusion

The only intelligent thing about this is that they do it to countries that can affect them directly in a future. ANALYSIS I am a very big fan of this type of investigations. When I get the opportunity to choose a topic at my discretion I usually tend to choose something, which really is of my own interest. This will certainly increase the quality of my project. I look towards these projects as the perfect opportunity to investigate about something I rather not investigate in my free time (for many reasons). I was interested in this specific topic because I have had the chance of being involved in situations were I'm in doubt of what is true and what is not. My doubt was; why does the U.S government want to damage our reputation so badly. Also if this had something to do with them being the worlds greatest drug consumers. Since the start of my project I reflected images like; terrorism, drugs, violence, corruption, politics, film industries, etc. All these added up make one simple picture: Negativism inside within a country, unfortunately; Colombia. During the report I was permanently using adjectives, quotes, examples, and a numerous amount of nouns. I used several different but not many verbs. Within the adverbs and conjunctions I do accept that there has been a failure with the usage of these. My tone is more of a narrator type of tone, which in some parts does change and becomes a bit aggressive. I do know that my change in tone might not be very comfortable for the reader. The mood instead was amore positive. I was being very descriptive and trying to be very persuasive. I might have not achieved completely what I was trying to achieve when I wrote my rationale. Because I do feel that in some parts I don't answer nor prove what I was supposed to. It seem that there are many parts were I go on and on giving examples and talking about things related to my investigation. I would finally classify my project as 70% effective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. There has been a significant Palestinian refugee problem for the last fifty years. Do ...

    The Israeli citizen, Dr Yuli Tamir, claims that the Arabs left due to their own propaganda and then stayed in the camps as a "weapon against Israel". However, the Palestinian citizen, Dr Hannan Shashmari, claims that the Arabs were expelled from their homes.

  2. Why did the relationship between the USA and USSR change between 1975 and 1990

    in 1983 he sent US forces to crush a communist coup in Grenada. It was hard to talk with the Russians in the early 1980's as their leaders kept dying. In 1982 Brezhnev died ending an era or hard line communist rulers.

  1. Did the PLO achieve anything using terrorism

    The hijackers flew it to Entebbe in Uganda, but the Israeli armed forces flew over 2000 miles to kill the Palestinian terrorists and free the 100 Jewish civilians who were being held captive. This sort of story meant that hijackings became less common due to terrorists being fearful of the Israeli authorities.

  2. Keeping Mandela in prison between 1964 and 1990 was a mistake(TM)

    is against the Botha's reforms of 1985 and says that the Blacks of South Africa will carry on protesting and that apartheid will not be ignored. It shows that the South African government is imprisoning any opposition. I believe that this poster is very biased as it is a form

  1. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    The USA did not want destroy the detente that had formed between the two superpowers after the Cuban missile crisis. A further key feature was the creation of the Brezhnev Doctrine which stated that a threat to one communist country is a threat to them all.

  2. Cold War Summary, quotes and revision notes.

    "Two Camps Theory" USA USSR - Capitalist ideals - Democracy - Rights of the individual Negatives - Wealth did not trickle down ot poor = class based society, inequality - Civil inequality for black citizens - Persecution of communist sympathizers - Support of the brutal anti-communist dictators around the world - Communist ideals of Karl Marx (Marxism)

  1. Can the Bombing of Hiroshima be Justified?

    What would they do then? They would be humiliating themselves in the fact they failed, but Japan would be safe. If they had really wanted to, America could have found another way around Japan?s apparent refusal to surrender rather than to drop the bomb.

  2. How far has the USA role in world affairs developed from 1929 to 2000?

    The expense of the policy of containment had to be cut as the cost of the arms race was massive. America wanted to develop friendlier relations with the Communist superpowers during the 1970s; US foreign policy had changed to detente.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work