• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The battle of Dunkirk.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The battle of Dunkirk Question 2 In my opinion the battle of Dunkirk can be seen as both a deliverance and disaster. It can be seen as a deliverance by the fact that the British and French survived which is a great feat on it's own, because seeing what predicament the British and French were in, it was likely they were going to lose. They turned the tables and 338,000 men were saved. On the other hand, it can be seen as a disaster because out of the 338,000 men saved 139,997 were French, so for British morale that wasn't very good. Also even Churchill said, "Wars are not won by evacuation". Some would say that Britain still lived to fight another day that is also an important point. I will try to come to a conclusion based on my own knowledge and some sources. I would like to start by giving some of the reasons why this battle can be seen as a great deliverance because the British survived to fight another day, and the population back home was led to believe it was a great delivery. ...read more.

Middle

The problem with this source is that it is a still life picture meaning, it's just one second of someone's life.From all we know a German heinikel could have dropped a bomb any time killing the soldiers just after this photo was taken. Source F shows the soldiers warding off German fighter planes. This to is a very good photo on propaganda to boost British morale; this also shows the British strife because they are willing to die to save their country. Altogether none of these sources are sufficient enough o support the interpretation, they are just pictures, so anything could have happened after they were taken or painted, they just don't tell me enough. Source H implies that it was a deliverance, because a small passage from it says "tens of thousands safely home already, many more coming by day and night", but and in most cases there is one, it again fails to tell us that France has fallen into the hands of the Germans that's why the British had to retreat to the coast. Source H is a barefaced piece of propaganda. Now if I move on to source I it is the only source that seems fair because in it says that 1/3rd of the men saved were French, and the weather was good and vast losses. ...read more.

Conclusion

These sources also refer to operation Dynamo that no other source talks about, so we get information on the build up and the plans for evacuation, which are vital on our understanding of the battle. The video still surpassed all the other sources on supporting this interpretation. It was very critical and unbiased. Still none of the sources apart from source I tell us about the eastern mole, and the1-mile jetty that helped so many men escape. Also all of them failed to mention that 1/3rd of the men saved were French. To conclude, some people would say that it was a great deliverance because the British lived to fight another day, but as Churchill said, "wars are not won by evacuation", also the Americans thought the British would lose, they were proven wrong. Some people say if the British hadn't evacuated the war would have been lost there and then. On the other hand it can be seen as a disaster because only 2/3rd of the men saved were British. There were 68,000 casualties, and a lot of weaponry was lost. In my opinion it was a bit of both, deliverance and disaster. There isn't sufficient evidence to rule anything out. I would say that Dunkirk was a lesson learnt by the British and a hard one at that. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk and the Battle of Britain - 'Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a ...

    This source provides sufficient evidence to suggest Dunkirk was deliverance. However the source also contains factors showing disaster. There is evidence of sinking boats, the high dark, balls of smoke and fire from the oil factories, this tells us that the Germans were accurate in there attack and created a lot of damage.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    They show a pier built into the sea made from British trucks. It looks very disorganised and suggests how they panicked to evacuate quickly. They show Dunkirk immediately after the evacuation making it a primary source. However the photos were likely to be used as propaganda, which suggests that the

  1. Defeat, deliverace or victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    This is the first day of the evacuation, and from my own knowledge, I am aware of the situation on that day. On the first day only 7,669 troops were evacuated(as source 10 shows), and these were taken on medium to large craft such as paddle steamers, destroyers and self-propelled barges.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The saviour of the B.E.F. was the only bright military aspect Britain could take out of Dunkirk. Without them Britain would have lost the war there and then. Historians feel that Dunkirk was a defeat for morale with the British Armed forces morale left in tatters and for the first

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    This source would be slightly biased in that the evacuation was probably a lot more orderly once the retreat was further underway. Also, this memory is recollected a significant time after the event, and his memory might be blurred, but I don't think this would have a notable effect on his interpretation.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The source however could be unreliable as the book was published only 12 years after the war so the author might have had to be careful about what he said, an unfavourable report could have been censored. The author also wouldn't have had much benefit of hindsight so soon after the war.

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    heavy equipment, 600 tanks were lost, more than 1000 filed guns, 850 anti-tank guns and a large number of lorries cars and motorbikes were left in France. This just shows me how much machinery was actually lost, and that Britain's factory workers had to work hard to replace the amount of equipment lost in Dunkirk.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    It does not inform you about the horrific things that had happened, the casualties or the fatalities. Source B is from a book published in England in July 1940 shortly after the events at Dunkirk. From this source we can infer that the evacuation was a success.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work