• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Battle of Passchendaele

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of Passchendaele By Timothy Dry Mr. Morris 1) Explain Haig's objectives for Passchendaele Passchendaele was a series of attacks with one objective of taking Passchendaele ridge and village. Haig had two major objectives that would help the British to win the war. The first one was to capture Zeebrugge and Ostend, two submarine bases on the Belgium coast. This was 'following a warning issued by British Admiral Jellicoe that the current level of shipping losses, around 6million tons during 1917(1 in 4 ships), would prevent the British from sustaining the war into 1918'. Capturing these ports would halt this U-boat warfare, which was causing havoc among merchant ships taking supplies to Britain. His second was a more long term and relating much more to the war in general. To do this he would need to get through Passchendaele to push up North towards the ports. This was Haig's idea as a war of attrition; where the army would break up the morale of the German army. This also meant killing as many well trained enemy troops as possible. This, Haig believed would lead to the end of the war. The British had to be prepared for heavy losses themselves. ...read more.

Middle

The use of tanks became impossible. The ground made it impossible to tunnel mineshafts into because it was only a few metres above sea level and the deep tunnels would just fill with water. The geology of the land made it difficult as well because there was a band of wet sand and blue clay. It made it difficult to succeed because Haig didn't have much knowledge of the conditions he was sending the men to fight in. The thick dense mass of barbed wire that was protecting the German troops in their trenches was almost impossible to get through. It slowed down the attack allowing the machine gun cross fire to mow down the troops stuck in the wire. Haig firmly believed in using cavalry charges and the horses were just as stuck and larger targets. When the wire was bombarded with shells it barely cut the wire and just tangled it up more and more. The allied shells were unreliable and often didn't explode. The men's morale was very low and they were reluctant to attack. The ten-day bombardment previous to attack had taken away the surprise of the attack. Haig was very ambitious and had lots of self-belief. ...read more.

Conclusion

It failed to capture the railway. This would have been a major failure if the war had lasted a lot longer as Germany would have been able to sustain her Army longer during which they could have made a crucial blow to the British by getting through to Paris and capturing France. The British were fairly lucky in the spring when the Germans made a breakthrough but the supplies did not catch up with them and they lost many men. This was a success as the British had reserve troops to counterattack. Haig was a very successful leader; there was no mutiny of the British troops and he was not forced out of his job. Therefore Haig must have been a success as far as Lloyd George was concerned. There are many successes and failures of the Battle and I think that the successes outweigh the failures. I think this because in relation to the wider war Haig had provided a firm base at Ypres, which all that was required of it, was to grind down the German war effort and win the war as quickly as possible. I think that Haig knew Germany was facing starvation and on the verge of collapse so even though he didn't fulfil his objectives I think that the campaign was a success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The first part of this attack was brilliant and succeeded brilliantly. Haig took the village of Messines, which was important because its heights commanded miles of German territory, Haig's second success. The conditions for the second phase were terrible, but Haig can hardly be blamed for that.

  2. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    I also have knowledge from the videos and books that not all the generals followed Haig's instructions. For example General Elliot refused to attack in poor weather conditions In source D an extract from the diary of an important New Zealand Officer whose men fought in the battle, criticism is strong towards Haig.

  1. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    source shows many vessels of all sizes and men lining the beaches boarding the boats. This suggests a rescue attempt from civilians. This alone shows great deliverance as ordinary people who had boats sailed all the way to Dunkirk to rescue the stranded soldiers.

  2. Why was it Important that the Gallipoli Campaign should succeed?

    Question 2: Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of Anzac soldiers at Gallipoli? Use source A and your own knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A shows two pictures of Anzac soldiers. The pictures show the soldiers to be battered, not well organised, and not very motivated but always smiling.

  1. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    Is there sufficient evidence in the sources to support this view? Nobody can deny that the British army did a remarkable job to retreat from Dunkirk. Although the British seized on indecision from the German troops to finish them off, they remained calm and remained to fight although many of them knew they would be caught or killed.

  2. The Third Battle of Ypres

    The water table was near the surface, even at the height of summer, and this reclaimed land was extremely vulnerable to shellfire that would destroy the drainage system and allow the land to flood. There was no layer of gravel and flooding would rapidly turn the whole battlefield into mud once the shelling started.

  1. Why was Britain able to win the Battle of Britain?

    This took place between 1st July and the 31st July. This did result in air combat over the sea but this quickly stopped when the British stopped taking the bait and withdrew its ships from the channel. During this period 120 British planes were shot down compared to 225 for the Germans.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    A significant proportion of the shells fired at enemy trenches were defective and failed to explode; "A large proportion of the heavy guns were of obsolete pattern and poor range while much of the ammunition was defective. Thus the shells could not penetrate the dug-outs in which German machine gunners were hiding [Somme]."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work