• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Battle of Passchendaele

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of Passchendaele By Timothy Dry Mr. Morris 1) Explain Haig's objectives for Passchendaele Passchendaele was a series of attacks with one objective of taking Passchendaele ridge and village. Haig had two major objectives that would help the British to win the war. The first one was to capture Zeebrugge and Ostend, two submarine bases on the Belgium coast. This was 'following a warning issued by British Admiral Jellicoe that the current level of shipping losses, around 6million tons during 1917(1 in 4 ships), would prevent the British from sustaining the war into 1918'. Capturing these ports would halt this U-boat warfare, which was causing havoc among merchant ships taking supplies to Britain. His second was a more long term and relating much more to the war in general. To do this he would need to get through Passchendaele to push up North towards the ports. This was Haig's idea as a war of attrition; where the army would break up the morale of the German army. This also meant killing as many well trained enemy troops as possible. This, Haig believed would lead to the end of the war. The British had to be prepared for heavy losses themselves. ...read more.

Middle

The use of tanks became impossible. The ground made it impossible to tunnel mineshafts into because it was only a few metres above sea level and the deep tunnels would just fill with water. The geology of the land made it difficult as well because there was a band of wet sand and blue clay. It made it difficult to succeed because Haig didn't have much knowledge of the conditions he was sending the men to fight in. The thick dense mass of barbed wire that was protecting the German troops in their trenches was almost impossible to get through. It slowed down the attack allowing the machine gun cross fire to mow down the troops stuck in the wire. Haig firmly believed in using cavalry charges and the horses were just as stuck and larger targets. When the wire was bombarded with shells it barely cut the wire and just tangled it up more and more. The allied shells were unreliable and often didn't explode. The men's morale was very low and they were reluctant to attack. The ten-day bombardment previous to attack had taken away the surprise of the attack. Haig was very ambitious and had lots of self-belief. ...read more.

Conclusion

It failed to capture the railway. This would have been a major failure if the war had lasted a lot longer as Germany would have been able to sustain her Army longer during which they could have made a crucial blow to the British by getting through to Paris and capturing France. The British were fairly lucky in the spring when the Germans made a breakthrough but the supplies did not catch up with them and they lost many men. This was a success as the British had reserve troops to counterattack. Haig was a very successful leader; there was no mutiny of the British troops and he was not forced out of his job. Therefore Haig must have been a success as far as Lloyd George was concerned. There are many successes and failures of the Battle and I think that the successes outweigh the failures. I think this because in relation to the wider war Haig had provided a firm base at Ypres, which all that was required of it, was to grind down the German war effort and win the war as quickly as possible. I think that Haig knew Germany was facing starvation and on the verge of collapse so even though he didn't fulfil his objectives I think that the campaign was a success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    This is an assuring speech. The deliverance is that the young boy who went to war has now grown into seasoned veterans. The main triumph is that the army has the weapon of refusing to accept defeat. This is the key to victory.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    frontline, Haig's tactics were wearing them down and using up their resources, so Haig's tactic was a very useful one to use at the time even if it cost men. Haig did achieve his objectives in the end. He did wear down the Germans and he did inflict heavy losses on them.

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    From prior knowledge I can support the theory that Haig had little knowledge of the conditions his forces were involved in. I know this as although Haig had total control over his chain of command, many of the Intelligence officers were too scared were scared to tell him the truth when they were being defeated.

  2. The first major German offensive occurred at Verdun.

    He says in it �they worked their way further and further into the German lines. We had heavy losses in men and material. As a result of the Somme we were completely exhausted on the Western Front. If the war had lasted our defeat seemed inevitable�.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Because France was anticipating an attack it had fortified its border with Germany by stationing thousands of troops and Artillery guns ready to defend. Because of this, the Germans sent most of its troops through Belgium and around the majority of the French forces and sent the remainder German troops to attack against the French troops on the border.

  2. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    Due to this technology and seeing how France and Poland had fallen, the Brits could learn from there mistakes and use it to there advantage. Also Britain commanded the air due to there advance in planes so this was no problem.

  1. Why was Britain able to win the Battle of Britain?

    over 80% and the Chain home became one of the biggest factors in helping Britain to win the B of B. Small inventions such as bullet-proof windscreens for fighter planes also helped the British. The Second contributing factor in helping Britain to win the B of B was Leadership.

  2. Officially known as the Third Battle of Ypres, Passchendaele became infamous not only for ...

    It eventually became so deep that men and horses drowned in it. On 16 August the attack was resumed, to little effect. Stalemate reigned for another month until an improvement in the weather prompted another attack on 20 September.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work