• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Battle of Passchendaele

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of Passchendaele By Timothy Dry Mr. Morris 1) Explain Haig's objectives for Passchendaele Passchendaele was a series of attacks with one objective of taking Passchendaele ridge and village. Haig had two major objectives that would help the British to win the war. The first one was to capture Zeebrugge and Ostend, two submarine bases on the Belgium coast. This was 'following a warning issued by British Admiral Jellicoe that the current level of shipping losses, around 6million tons during 1917(1 in 4 ships), would prevent the British from sustaining the war into 1918'. Capturing these ports would halt this U-boat warfare, which was causing havoc among merchant ships taking supplies to Britain. His second was a more long term and relating much more to the war in general. To do this he would need to get through Passchendaele to push up North towards the ports. This was Haig's idea as a war of attrition; where the army would break up the morale of the German army. This also meant killing as many well trained enemy troops as possible. This, Haig believed would lead to the end of the war. The British had to be prepared for heavy losses themselves. ...read more.

Middle

The use of tanks became impossible. The ground made it impossible to tunnel mineshafts into because it was only a few metres above sea level and the deep tunnels would just fill with water. The geology of the land made it difficult as well because there was a band of wet sand and blue clay. It made it difficult to succeed because Haig didn't have much knowledge of the conditions he was sending the men to fight in. The thick dense mass of barbed wire that was protecting the German troops in their trenches was almost impossible to get through. It slowed down the attack allowing the machine gun cross fire to mow down the troops stuck in the wire. Haig firmly believed in using cavalry charges and the horses were just as stuck and larger targets. When the wire was bombarded with shells it barely cut the wire and just tangled it up more and more. The allied shells were unreliable and often didn't explode. The men's morale was very low and they were reluctant to attack. The ten-day bombardment previous to attack had taken away the surprise of the attack. Haig was very ambitious and had lots of self-belief. ...read more.

Conclusion

It failed to capture the railway. This would have been a major failure if the war had lasted a lot longer as Germany would have been able to sustain her Army longer during which they could have made a crucial blow to the British by getting through to Paris and capturing France. The British were fairly lucky in the spring when the Germans made a breakthrough but the supplies did not catch up with them and they lost many men. This was a success as the British had reserve troops to counterattack. Haig was a very successful leader; there was no mutiny of the British troops and he was not forced out of his job. Therefore Haig must have been a success as far as Lloyd George was concerned. There are many successes and failures of the Battle and I think that the successes outweigh the failures. I think this because in relation to the wider war Haig had provided a firm base at Ypres, which all that was required of it, was to grind down the German war effort and win the war as quickly as possible. I think that Haig knew Germany was facing starvation and on the verge of collapse so even though he didn't fulfil his objectives I think that the campaign was a success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The first part of this attack was brilliant and succeeded brilliantly. Haig took the village of Messines, which was important because its heights commanded miles of German territory, Haig's second success. The conditions for the second phase were terrible, but Haig can hardly be blamed for that.

  2. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    It shows disaster as the men who were lining the beaches were under constant fire and I know that many soldiers were injured and had equipment and arms seized. This source may be biased though as Charles Cundall was a British government worker which could affect the reliability of the source.

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    From prior knowledge I can support the theory that Haig had little knowledge of the conditions his forces were involved in. I know this as although Haig had total control over his chain of command, many of the Intelligence officers were too scared were scared to tell him the truth when they were being defeated.

  2. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    When Lord Beaverbrook took control of production he stopped making bomber planes and increased the production of fighter planes, he made sure that they were built for speed and manoeuvrability. When Beaverbrook arrived form July-September Britain were making 563 planes per month, so they were basically out producing the German who were no match.

  1. Why was Britain able to win the Battle of Britain?

    This also disheartened the Germans and they believed that it would be very hard to knock-out all of the Stations and make a gap in the British defence system. As Eagle Assault commenced the Germans attacked several British Air Fields and carried on varied assaults on Chain Home.

  2. Why was it Important that the Gallipoli Campaign should succeed?

    main one which where important at the time of the battle were in the interest of Britain. So over all the main reason for the necessary success of the battle would be that Russia needed help. Question 2: Study Source A.

  1. The Third Battle of Ypres

    The water table was near the surface, even at the height of summer, and this reclaimed land was extremely vulnerable to shellfire that would destroy the drainage system and allow the land to flood. There was no layer of gravel and flooding would rapidly turn the whole battlefield into mud once the shelling started.

  2. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    Source A is a written source, a naval officer, Commander Thomas Kerr who was sent across the English Channel to organize the evacuation of British troops, wrote it. I presume the source was very close to May/June 1940. But there is very little detail in the source, which therefor does not make the as useful as it could have been.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work