• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Battle of the Somme: Were Lions led by Donkeys?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐The Somme: Were Lions led by donkeys? Introduction Throughout the following essay, I will be discussing and providing evidence to debate whether ?Lions led by donkeys? was the correct phrase to use to describe the generals and the soldiers during the Battle of the Somme. "Lions led by donkeys" was a phrase used to describe the British infantry of the First World War and to condemn the generals who commanded them. The contention is that the brave soldiers (lions) were sent to their deaths by incompetent and indifferent leaders (donkeys) at the Battle of the Somme. The phrase was first used by Max Hoffman and was later used in a book describing the First World War by Alan Clark. The Battle of the Somme took place between 1st July and 18th November 1916, months before the beginning of the First World War. After the battle over 3,000,000 shells were collected and sources provide evidence that 2,000 guns were used by the British divisions during this horrific period. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers from both armies lost their lives, which is the main reason why people still remember the battle to this day. Personally, I believe that the phrase ?Lions led by donkeys? is correct but the evidence given in this essay provides arguments for both sides of the case (a mixture of good and bad things which generals did during the Battle of the Somme). ...read more.

Middle

In addition, General Edmund Allenby noticed problems with the battle plan - he thought that the British troops would be open to German artillery fire. He also spotted a one mile gap between two divisions. Despite receiving such advice the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) commander, General Douglas Haig, chose to ignore it which was extremely unwise. As a consequence, casualties increased significantly. General Haig - What went wrong? General Haig (shown above in the picture) was originally pressured to bring forward the attack date from August in order to relieve the heavy casualties in Verdun, Southern France. The Germans had been bombarding this area since early in the year so it was thought that by committing significant British forces on the Battle of the Somme; the allies? forces would divert troops from Verdun. Therefore there would be a reduced rate of casualties in other affected areas further south. General Haig?s plan at the beginning of the Battle of the Somme was to use artillery fire (like bomb shells) and completely destroy the German trenches. Once the trenches were destroyed, the British soldiers would walk over no man?s land and meet little resistance. However, the shells that were fired at the enemy trenches were of very poor condition therefore the bombardment failed to destroy either the barbed wire or the concrete bunkers protecting the allies? soldiers. ...read more.

Conclusion

As a result of my research, I feel that the generals didn?t really consider the troops? safety when forming their battle plans. A different point of view is that on the first day of the battle, the Germans caught the British troops by surprise, suggesting why there were some many casualties on that day. On the other hand, I feel that the cost in human terms (with nearly 150,000 allied men being killed) was too high for relatively little gain in land (seven miles). As mentioned earlier in the essay, it is still remembered today purely due to the number of casualties suffered by the British and French troops, especially on the first day of the battle. In my opinion it is clearly evident that a group of people were to blame for the disaster. From my research, I have found that the generals in charge of the British army were at fault for the huge numbers of casualties during the Battle of the Somme, particularly BEF commander General Douglas Haig, who ignored advice from everybody; soldiers and other generals which could have increased their territorial gains and reduced the casualties. In conclusion, my opinion is that the stronger evidence persuades me to agree with the original statement made by Max Hoffman describing the British Infantry as ?Lions led by Donkeys?. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    I must question these sources because they may not be accurate. After looking at these, I must look at the argument, which is against the accusation that the Generals were "Donkeys". The Case Against The Interpretation There is one fact about the argument that I have so far left out.

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    This attack was to reduce pressure off Verdun. The idea of the attack was to spread the German troops too thinly between Verdun and Somme.

  1. "Lions led by donkeys". How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    Source C2 is evidence of the massacre in the First World War, especially on the Western Front. The source shows that nearly ninety percent of all deaths in the War came from the Western Front "Western Front All other fronts Total Deaths" 648,376 73,783 722,159 This backs up the interpretation

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    Conversely, perhaps the men behaved more like sheep than lions in following the obviously risky order to walk. It would have been braver to stand up to the Generals, maybe saving hundreds of lives. When Ludendorff says 'donkeys', he is referring to the incompetence of the Generals.

  1. The Battle of the Somme

    some way to save Haig's reputation in the eyes of some historians. As the battle of the Somme got underway, the Germans were forced to send in troops that had previously been stationed at Verdun to aid those at the Somme.

  2. history somme

    was secretary of war at that time and if he had done something wrong he would get sacked by the government even though it may not be his fault. For example he couldn't talk about the numbers that were dead because the government were sure to blame that on him

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    At the same time, the Allied nations, especially the United States, were rapidly building new shipping. By the outset of 1918, the Allies were turning out more new ships than the Germans were destroying, and the German effort to end the war by submarine warfare had clearly failed.

  2. "The British Army were Lions led by Donkeys." Discuss.

    them to the well-defended German trenches and these bombs did nearly no damage to the Germans, suggesting that the British were wasting the government?s money on something that is useless. However, shooting bombs to such a long distance is really hard and the British really needed to weaken the German

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work