• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bolsheviks, Lenin & Stalin - source based quiestions

Extracts from this document...


Ashleigh Bewick Coursework Unit 2: Russia - The Bolsheviks, Lenin & Stalin 1) Study sources A and B Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? These sources give some similarities and some differences. They give similar impressions by both showing Stalin with what he has achieved since he has been in power. In both pictures he looks happy with what he has done. In source A he is looking happy with how many people he has killed. In source B he looks happy as he is showing workers what he has built to make Russia better. He seems to be at one with the working class, which probably made this a source of propaganda, showing that Stalin has everyone's interest at heart. However the sources are also very different. Source A is a cartoon, which perhaps makes him look like a less serious person. In source A Stalin is stood with lots of skulls referring to how many people he has killed so it is almost a comic picture. The artist is turning it into a 'joke' as it seems unreal for anyone to be so happy with killing so many people. In source B, however, he is stood in front of a newly hydroelectric power station, which shows the good he has achieved for Russia. This would have been used to make the Russian people think that Stalin was achieving great things. ...read more.


In the background of the source there is gallows already prepared which shows the trial was pointless as the outcome had already been decided. The accused are all confessing very openly and in a sarcastic manner. "Yes, I�m guilty!" "Sure, I tried to betray my country!" "Of course I�m a traitor!" "There�s no doubt about my guilt!" These statements are that of the accused in the source, they are almost joking about their guilt. This is used to show the absurdity of the confessions; even if the men were guilty they wouldn�t confess so openly or would at least try to defend themselves. The source is trying to show that the men were some how forced into confessing. Source J is a cartoon published in France in the late 1930�s. It show�s the courtroom at a show trial. In the courtroom Stalin is everyone, the judge, the barrister, the court clerk and the whole jury is Stalin. The source is trying to show that the show trials were a joke, Stalin had total control over what was going to happen. There was no point in a trial they were going to be executed no matter what the court may say. The two sources are similar in many ways, they both agree the show trails were a sham, they were completely controlled by Stalin and the outcome was predetermined, source I shows this with the gallows in the background and source J shows this with everyone in he courtroom being Stalin. ...read more.


Source H a speech by Khrushchev. Stalin was very paranoid about his ability as leader, he got rid of any opposition during the "purges" where he carried out executions of his opponents. Stalin was very popular at the time, although he now appears like a monster the Soviet public thought very highly of him. "Everybody is familiar with the clarity of mind, his iron will, his devotion to the party, his ardent faith in the people and love for the people." Source K. The disagreement about Stalin is whether or not he was a good politician and whether he was a monster. It is difficult to know the whole truth about Stalin, the use of censoring and propaganda in the USSR at the time he was in power means the reliability of the sources that came out of the USSR at the time is questionable. Sources that came out of places such as France are also questionable as they are generally written by exiled Russians who will be bitter and produce biased accounts. In conclusion the sources suggest that the disagreement about Stalin is because of the differing accounts of Stalin�s time in power, some portray him as a monster where some show him as the hero of the USSR. Stalin was a very complex character. He did many evil things but also did many very good things for the USSR. He was a good politician and changed the USSR, but was also very paranoid and felt the need to kill anyone who posed a threat to him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    This process was known as Dekulakisation. The typical kulak family opened two or three horses and several cows, and had a larger than average farm but they also had other peasants that were hired by them to work for them in the harvest season. Stalin thought that the most likely people to oppose the collectivisation scheme was the kulaks because they had very much to lose.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    As this speech was held in 1936, Bukharin hated Stalin and therefore it can be assumed that his speech will be very anti-Stalin. When evaluating which is more reliable source E or source F a few things should be taken into consideration.

  1. Assessment on whether Stalin was a necessary evil.

    and promoted vigilance to prevent people acting on "subversive thoughts" by teaching them to see spies and traitors everywhere. The system reached such a stage where individuals were even arrested for "failure to denounce" suspicious people. In the struggle for unity as understood dogmatically by Stalin he gradually killed off the healthy exchange of opinion.

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    What was Lenin's influence after his death in 1924? Lenin was ill for much of his later years. His health had been damaged severely by the strains of revolution and war and also by his attempted assassination earlier in his life.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Overall, Khrushchev says Stalin was a good leader. Source H is not about Stalin as a statesman but more about his personality. The speech was also, like source g, given in 1956. We don't know if this was a separate speech or if it was the same one because the

  2. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    Stalin then used this murder as an excuse to get rid of all of the people that he thought was against him. By 1935, all of the 5,000 delegates who attended the 17th party congress were dead. Then in Leningrad, 100,000 people were arrested and accused of plotting with Trotsky (lived in Mexico)

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    to foreign countries to raise funds for buying industrial machinery needed for use on harvests which were to be collectivised so that more efficient and mechanised methods of farming could be used to produce more food which could be rationed equally to everyone so that no one starves.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Already the Cheka (the Extraordinary Commission for Repression against counter-revolution, speculation, and desertion), which made mass arrests of suspects, was tending to settle their fate independently, under formal control by the Party, but in reality without anybody's knowledge. It was becoming a State within the State, protected by military secrecy and proceedings in camera.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work