• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bombing of Hiroshima - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE BOMBING OF HIROSHIMA - QUESTION 1 Source A is a picture source, which shows the mass devastation caused by the atomic bomb at Hiroshima. The source is an Ariel photograph, which was taken at the heart of Hiroshima, it was taken a day after the bomb was dropped. Source B is an eyewitness account of the bombs consequences and describes the people around him. Source A focuses on the geographical consequence of the bomb. From the source we can see mass destruction and devastation, there seems to be no signs of life what so ever. There is absolute destruction shown and there is only really one house visible, which is crumbling down into pieces. ...read more.

Middle

It may also have been used to show the rest of the world Americas supremacy. It does this very well. The source is extremely useful as it is a clear Ariel photograph which displays a wide area of land in which we can see the physical effects, which ultimately is high devastation. But the source can be unhelpful in some respects as it is only one area of Hiroshima and so there may not have been that much devastation overall. It may be the not be as bad as other parts and could be exaggerated. But ultimately the bomb had a large radius and would have destroyed a large area quite easily. ...read more.

Conclusion

He would have hated the Americans for what they did so would naturally exaggerate. Overall source A is a much more useful source as evidence of the physical effects of the Hiroshima bomb. The source is an actual photograph, which focuses on the land, and so we can gather much information about the physical effects. Source B is very useful in dealing with the human aspect of the bomb, but the visually powerful picture in source A is much more useful for the physical effects and paints a thousand words. There is so much mire we can learn and conclude from source A. it shows the true devastation to the land and shows the bomb and Americans left nothing standing in there way. HASHPAL S SIHRE 11.7 HISTORY QUESTION 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Hiroshima Bombing, Justified or not?

    a shadow president, and he believes that the bombs should not of been used, now anyone else saying this and we would think much but a man close to the big cheese then it must be something good to note down and also this man should share the same ideas

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    Sumiteru Tanaguschi is another Japanese victim of the Atom Bomb. He was delivering newspapers when the bomb was dropped, and the bomb scarred his body and his mind. These two men represent all the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They do not see the bomb as "a beautiful great thing"

  1. Migrations, Case Study

    They offered the country the possibility of having a greater amount of working force so as to begin to work on land. Source 1: "In the peak period of the world's oversee migration, 1821-1932, six countries absorbed 90 per cent of the total, and among these six, Argentina ranked second in the number of immigrants, with a total of 6,405,000.

  2. Eyewitness - source related review

    The leaflet also asks anyone with information to come to the nearest metropolitan police station showing the rift between the central London police force and the other one which prevented the two from pooling their information. The police also put more men on the streets of Whitechapel in attempt to

  1. Jack The Ripper - source related study.

    He wore clothes that he knew would make identifying himself difficult. For example, 'dark coat', 'a deerstalker hat.' As you can see the clothes that he wore would ensure he would not stand out too much, he would wear clothes that were regularly worn by many at the time.

  2. How reliable is the photograph as a historical source?

    If we had no photographs of the Crystal Palace (P.H. Delamotte 1854), the tragedy of its destruction would be all the greater.2 And Frank Meadow Sutcliffe's studies of the Whitby fisherfolk preserve their 'now vanished way of life'.3 Furthermore, could anyone really visualise 'inflating buffalo skins to cross a river in the Himalayas' without Samuel Bourne's wonderful photograph?

  1. The Other Side of the Destruction

    on the deadly staves which they sharpened and blackened by fire before setting them into the floor of the pit" (Pg. 58). Now, if the Indians were so na�ve and "innocent as can be imagined" (Pg. 9), how did they being the brainless people he portrays them to be, think of such an evil plan to fool their conniving adversaries?

  2. Q.1. What can you learn from Source A about the murder of Polly Nicholls? [6]

    The main reason for this is probably because Source A is an article from a tabloid, exaggerates the truth. Q.3. How useful are Sources D and E in helping you to understand why the Ripper was able to avoid capture?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work