• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bombing of Hiroshima - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


THE BOMBING OF HIROSHIMA - QUESTION 1 Source A is a picture source, which shows the mass devastation caused by the atomic bomb at Hiroshima. The source is an Ariel photograph, which was taken at the heart of Hiroshima, it was taken a day after the bomb was dropped. Source B is an eyewitness account of the bombs consequences and describes the people around him. Source A focuses on the geographical consequence of the bomb. From the source we can see mass destruction and devastation, there seems to be no signs of life what so ever. There is absolute destruction shown and there is only really one house visible, which is crumbling down into pieces. ...read more.


It may also have been used to show the rest of the world Americas supremacy. It does this very well. The source is extremely useful as it is a clear Ariel photograph which displays a wide area of land in which we can see the physical effects, which ultimately is high devastation. But the source can be unhelpful in some respects as it is only one area of Hiroshima and so there may not have been that much devastation overall. It may be the not be as bad as other parts and could be exaggerated. But ultimately the bomb had a large radius and would have destroyed a large area quite easily. ...read more.


He would have hated the Americans for what they did so would naturally exaggerate. Overall source A is a much more useful source as evidence of the physical effects of the Hiroshima bomb. The source is an actual photograph, which focuses on the land, and so we can gather much information about the physical effects. Source B is very useful in dealing with the human aspect of the bomb, but the visually powerful picture in source A is much more useful for the physical effects and paints a thousand words. There is so much mire we can learn and conclude from source A. it shows the true devastation to the land and shows the bomb and Americans left nothing standing in there way. HASHPAL S SIHRE 11.7 HISTORY QUESTION 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Hiroshima Bombing, Justified or not?

    a shadow president, and he believes that the bombs should not of been used, now anyone else saying this and we would think much but a man close to the big cheese then it must be something good to note down and also this man should share the same ideas

  2. How useful is visible evidence in explaining the development of power at Styal Mill ...

    This does not however provide sufficient evidence as we cannot see it in its working environment and it does not appear to be installed. It is more likely that it was brought to the mill to be used as an exhibit for demonstrating forms of power more advanced than the steam engine.

  1. The Other Side of the Destruction

    "the natives attacked with such unrelenting ferocity that it seemed to the garrison that not one of them would be left alive" (Pg. 51). Not only were the Indians capable of manipulating and taking revenge, they also were not as unintelligent as Las Casas claims them to be.

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    Source D is micro evidence from Kasai Yukiko remembering what her teacher told her to do when allies invaded Japan. In the 1930-40's teachers were very authorative figures and were treated with immense respect. Whatever they told you to do; you had to do it.

  1. Jack The Ripper - source related study.

    of the neck. So unlike source B, although Elizabeth Strides' murder was by no means mild, source c's evidence says how NO other wounds or mutilations were apparent. Some seeing this may come to the conclusion that the two murders were not even linked or carried out by the same person.

  2. Eyewitness - source related review

    It was published by the police in an attempt to glean information from the public about the identity of Jack the Ripper. Source G is Part of a letter from the Home Secretary to the Mile End Vigilance Committee on 17 September 1888; it concerns the use of reward money for the information about Jack the Ripper.

  1. Migrations, Case Study

    Moreover, since 1860, the illness known as Malaria appeared in the country, and the insect which transmitted this illness attacked mainly the areas where there was more fertile land. Italy also suffered of constant earthquakes, which destroyed all the crops and cultivations.

  2. Q.1. What can you learn from Source A about the murder of Polly Nicholls? [6]

    Theories say that the killer was disturbed during his murder of Elizabeth Stride and hence the different between the two sources. Source A and Source B both support Source C, but Source B supports Source C more the source A.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work