• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The British offensive on the Sommewas doomed to be a disaster from the start and should never have been launched' How satisfactory are these sources in supporting this statement?

Extracts from this document...


History GCSE Coursework The Battle of the Somme 'The British offensive on the Somme was doomed to be a disaster from the start and should never have been launched' How satisfactory are these sources in supporting this statement? The Battle of the Somme was planned as a joint French and British operation with French commander-in-chief, Joseph Joffre in charge but a German attack at Verdun drained French resources and men. This meant that the Somme turned into a large scale British offensive with General Sir Douglas Haig and Sir Henry Rawlinson in charge. Haig had been taught in military college that the attacker had the advantage in battle, this may have been so for campaigns in Sudan and the Boer war but since then warfare had changed. For one of the first times in history two great industrial powers were at war who were evenly matched in almost every way making this war in the eyes of many especially Sir Douglas Haig a war of attrition, using revolutionary and new weaponry. Because of the use of machine guns the old style of open field battle disappeared instead a new kind of deadly trench warfare evolved. Haig was a man sturdily set in the old ways of always being on the offensive. He planned to use the same tactics as he used at the battle of Neuvelle Chapllon but on a larger scale, as these tactics had almost worked. Haig planned to use 750,000 men 27 divisions against only 16 divisions of the German front line. The first major German offensive occurred at Verdun, in 1916 against the French, and not long after, in June of the same year the French were on the brink of defeat. Just as this became apparent the British launched an offensive of their own, along the River Somme; this resulted in the Germans calling the battle of Verdun to a halt. ...read more.


what Haig says in the first sentence of his report because even a German General in his memoirs is writing that the Germans are worn down and exhausted. So at least here Haig is right. Source D (Extract from a letter written by Lloyd-George to Haig on 21st September 1916 after his visit to the Somme) Haig and Lloyd George disliked each other. But here Lloyd George praises Haig for the one thing he hates the most, the way in which Haig conducts battle, Lloyd George in his memoirs even condemned Haig as incompetent, a person who medalled with people's lives. The reason for this praise is at the time this letter was written Lloyd George was running to be prime-Minister as Asquith had resigned after his son died on the Somme. But Lloyd George being a Welshman from humble backgrounds was at a disadvantage and so needed allies like Haig who were in the Establishment and had friends in high places who could sway the vote for Lloyd George in his attempt at replacing Asquith and becoming Prime-Minister. Lloyd George writes this letter after his visit to the Somme but it would have been most likely that Lloyd George would have only seen a very small proportion of the entire 18 mile. Also Lloyd George would have also only seen select areas were the battle was going well. Really this source is quite unreliable because we don't really know if Lloyd George is really praising Haig or just manipulating him in sights of his own political ambitions. Source E Source E- Extract from My War Memoirs by the German General Ludendorff, published in 1919 this piece is evidence from after the event, secondary evidence. Therefore it doesn't carry so much judgement with it but Ludendorff was a key member of the German army. This piece is a justification of his part in the German war effort and tries to justify his part in the defeat of Germany. ...read more.


This final source clearly supports the statement, 'The British offensive on the Somme was doomed to be a disaster from the start and should never have been launched' because the soldier is writing about what a wicked and huge mistake the generals had made on the first day of the Somme, with the orders to walk across no-mans land. Conclusion After evaluating all the sources and considering the statement 'The British offensive on the Somme was doomed to be a disaster from the start and should never have been launched' I have decided that this statement cannot be taken at face value, because the Somme was not a complete disaster as it did relive pressure at Verdun and on the Eastern Front. But it was a disaster in the fact of the sheer number of casualties in comparison to the area of land gained. The Somme was 2 years in the making and ten minutes in the destroying these sources show the accounts of generals, soldiers and politicians but there are only ten sources to evaluate; for a huge controversial topic like the Somme this is not enough and to get a clearer picture we would need to analyse far more sources because these few only give a limited picture. The number of casualties and the incompetence of the generals was unredeemable but to say the Somme was an out and out disaster would be wrong as without it the Germans may have broken through at Verdun and taken France, and ultimately won the war. The Somme taught the British army many painful lessons but an army of volunteers went into the Somme and an Army of war hardened soldiers came out, also many new tactics were invented such as the 'creeping barrage' and tanks were used for the first time. The lessons taught at the Somme were hard ones but out of it came a new format in the way the war was fought and two years later Germany had been defeated. This coursework got full marks! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    The cream of British manhood was shattered in less than six hours'. This is a very angry way of expressing the opinion that Haig was knowingly sending the best of Britain young men to early deaths. Haig was responsible for these young men's lives and although he knew this he

  2. World War I in France 1916 - the Somme and Verdun.

    failings, Haig did manage to push the most powerful army of the time out of France. However, Haig was also dislike by many soldiers under his command. Source C was written by Fred Pearson who was a veteran of World War I.

  1. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    This is undoubtedly condemning Haig's tactics. Haig's tactics were also condemned by others with some social status and military experience. This can be seen in the aforementioned quote: source 12 (Winston Churchill). This leads to the next point that, if Lloyd George so clearly doubted Haig's ability, why did he not strip him of his authority?

  2. The aims of the British army at the Battle of the Somme in 1916.

    The final things the generals did wrong were sending all the soldiers 'over the top' at once and getting the whole plan completely wrong. General Haig was supposedly most to blame because as Rawlinson was the artillery expert he

  1. How important was Haig's role in the successes and failures of the British Army ...

    Every General was entitled to make a few mistakes but the mistakes made by Haig were catastrophic and had massive consequences.

  2. Why was the Somme offensive launched in 1916?

    This links me into my next point of political pressure. Because of the battle of Verdun the British government was being put under a lot of pressure to do something in retaliation. With this yet more political pressure was added by the failed attempt at Gallipoli to take turkey (A German ally.)

  1. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    For ten years, all the evidence seemed to support leaders like Haig, after the British did win the war. However historians began to claim that there was a government cover-up in favour of generals like Haig and by the end of the 1920s attitudes began to drastically change.

  2. Haig and the other British generals were incompetent leaders. How valid is this interpretation ...

    Also, Haig lived 50km behind the Front Line, so he had no grasp of the reality of war so had no compassion towards the soliders so the war ?went on for its own sake, as a contest of endurance?. For many people, the Battle of the Somme was the battle

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work