The changing role and status of women in Britain since 1900.

Authors Avatar

Hannah Greenslade                                                                   02/02/03                          

Coursework Assignment: The Changing Role and Status of Women in Britain since 1900

Explain why women failed to gain the right to vote between 1900 and 1914

During this piece of exploratory writing, I am going to look at the different reasons for why women failed to win the vote from 1900-1914 and what in particular led to this.

The Suffragists, despite their determination, were not dynamic enough in their actions to secure the vote for women from 1900-14.

 The Suffragists were the early (mainly middle class) campaigners for women’s suffrage (votes for women). Their methods were legal and peaceful, they did not believe in violent protests to get their point heard. They were made up of a number of suffrage societies across the country, which came together in 1897 to form the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS), led by Millicent Fawcett.

They used many peaceful tactics such as running meetings, holding processions, leading a deputation to the Prime Minister, public debates and petitions; all of which they achieved between 1905-10.

They had a number of successes in the early 1900s. By 1900, they had the support of more than half of MPs and in the following two years secured the support of many working class women as well.  

Although the suffragists failed to gain women the vote, they made a significant start to the women’s suffrage campaign. Millicent Fawcett said that her movement was “like a glacier”; slow moving but unstoppable.

The Suffragettes were more effective in the campaign for women’s suffrage than the Suffragists but they experienced many setbacks along the way meaning that by 1914, women still did not have the parliamentary vote.

Many women lost patience with the tactics of the NUWSS. The peaceful campaign seemed to be going nowhere. It had little press coverage and therefore little public interest. In 1903, the campaigner Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters formed the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). They were nicknamed the Suffragettes and campaigned, not only for women’s suffrage, but also for better living and working conditions for women. Their actions were a lot more active and militant and they quickly gained a lot more attention from the press. Between 1905-10, the Suffragettes took part in a number of militant strategies as part of their campaign, causing disruption at important meetings, deliberately trying to get arrested and sent to prison, attacking property and smashing windows. Later in 1913, they carried out arson, bombing and sabotage in many areas of Britain.

Join now!

Those Suffragettes successfully imprisoned would go on hunger strikes, refuse to be fed until the government, not wanting to create martyrs, ordered the prisoners to be force-fed. This barbaric procedure played into the hands of the Suffragettes as it won them sympathy with the public.

In May 1911, it looked as though the wait was over. Parliament gave its first reading to the Conciliation Bill, which would give women the vote. However, in November the bill fell through. This was the turning point for the Suffragettes. They became more violent and many MPs, who had been in favour of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay