• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Changing Role and Status of Women in Britain Since 1900.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework The Changing Role and Status of Women in Britain Since 1900 1. Prior to 1900, women were given hardly any rights; they did not have the right to vote. Those that were married had even less as it was believed that all of your possessions effectively belonged to your husband, and women were very much thought as being inferior to men. Only in the 1850s and 1860s did the first women's movement emerge in London. By 1903, there were two clear groups campaigning for women's suffrage, there was the NUWSS, formed in 1896, headed by Millicent Fawcett. The other was the WSPU formed in 1903, headed by Emmeline Pankhurst. These groups were to become known as the suffragists and the suffragettes respectively, and each would adopt different tactics. They both believed that if working women had to pay tax to a government, that they should surely have an opinion about who that government is. In the nineteenth and early twentieth century, their place was considered to be at home, to carry out the domestic chores. Women were allowed to attain a degree at universities, however where women performed the same jobs as men, they were paid less. The idea was that men worked and were paid to support his family whereas a woman works to amuse herself. ...read more.

Middle

The WSPU did not break from the suffragist past. They supplemented their constitutional methods with violence, but did continue to use legal methods as well. Both the WSPU and the NUWSS attempt to overcome the stalemate reached between themselves and the Liberal Government by supporting the two Conciliation Bills; the WSPU called a truce during negotiations but returned to violence when the Bills failed. Many of the NUWSS members resigned in response to the same disappoint. Neither the NUWSS nor the WSPU ever affiliated themselves with a political party (even though some of them supported the Liberals) and they kept dividing over whether they should do so. If they had, it might have brought more publicity and also help portray them as a responsible set of women, and putting a stop the thought of women not knowing anything about politics. There was also a lack of support behind the suffragettes and suffragists, and this was also a reason as to why women did not get the vote before 1914. There were only about 50,000 behind the suffragettes, and although there were more behind the peaceful suffragists, this was only a small proportion of women in the country. Working Class women did not join, as nobody would have paid any attention to them, and it was left to the sophisticated middle and upper class women, who were respected and esteemed. ...read more.

Conclusion

If working-class men were helping the war effort and therefore got the vote in return, women are doing the same thing, and should also get the vote, for their support of the war efforts. At a Speaker's Conference it was decided that women deserved to get the vote, in view of the fact that they had helped significantly with the war effort. Yet, they did not agree with the idea that all women would get the vote, as they thought that the women would be the majority of the Electorate. So they agreed to give all women homeowners over 30 the vote, thinking that they would be the most responsible. Millicent Fawcett's decision over whether to accept this was also imperative because she believed in equal franchise, but decided to agree nonetheless, thinking that it would be better to get a foothold first, then progress from there. Equal franchise was passed 10 years later, in 1928. The First World War was fundamental in bringing about this act. The new Representation of the People Act was a reflection of the gratitude of the women's work for the war effort, including all jobs which the men could not do and women carried out on their behalf. Without the war, they may never have had the chance to show off their responsibility and usefulness and so change feelings towards them and got women the vote. ?? ?? ?? ?? Parag Raval 11AC History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. how far did the role and status of women change from 1914 and ...

    and the women's royal air force (WRAF). Women in the WAAC were thought to be of a lower class. They quickly gained a 'bad' reputation for sexual misconduct with the troops in France. But the 21 reported pregnancies among the 6000 WAAC personal in France in 1918 suggest that these rumours were some what exaggerated.

  2. How did world war one change the role and status of women in England ...

    Women left for the land army as I thought it was a chance to gain freedom and new experiences. However it was not all that it seemed they were under strict discipline and once they were there they could not get out of it as they signed contracts for either six months or a year.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Haig's views on a war of attrition were good ones because his ruthless tactics were based around this view. If he did not think as he did then he would have had completely different tactics and they might not have been as effective as his proper ones were.

  2. The Changing roles of women

    set everyone talking about votes for women, to keep the subject in the press, to leave the government no peace from it.' Source 24 shows us the types of things they did, including 'heckling at government meetings,' 'start occasional attacks on property,' and 'carry out arson, bombing and sabotage in many areas of Britain.'

  1. Changes in the role of women in society 1900-1970.

    Women's rights movements were seen through the 60's, about total equal rights, in their work wage, humanitarian rights and other such subjects. Women were pardoned to take part in major rally's, supporting radical ideas, ranging from the communist uprising in Cuba, fuelled by the ever more well known Che Guevara,

  2. Why did the Liberals decline between 1908-1918?

    However, Asquith did not understand the war and his tactics were useless. He believed the Generals should fight the war and it should not be a government issue. Asquith put privately educated men as Generals and they did not understand the war either.

  1. The changing role and status of women in Britain since 1900

    caused by the Suffragettes during a particular 'attack' on the House of Commons. This newspaper article is obviously anti-suffragette and is trying to persuade the reader likewise. You can tell from the language used that the editor of this article is trying to portray the Suffragettes as violent and ridiculous women who were just making a mockery of themselves.

  2. The Changing Role and Status of Women in Britain

    Luckily not every woman felt the same as Queen Victoria. Many women felt that until they had the vote, they wouldn't be equals to men, and in 1880 many small women's rights groups came together under the leadership of Millicent Fawcett to form an organisation named the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work