• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Changing role of women in Britain since 1900.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Changing role of women in Britain since 1900. GCSE history Coursework Target 1: How useful is source A as evidence about attitudes towards suffragettes in 1908? Explain your answer using source and knowledge from your studies. The attitudes towards suffragettes in 1908 were mixed; everyone had their own opinions of them. Some people were very supportive on what they were doing and some of them had a very negative response. In source A there is a picture of a 'suffragette demonstrations in London 1908'. Underneath the source the source it states "Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst leading a demonstration which 200,00 people are said to have attended." This source does not give enough evidence to prove this statement. I explain why. In this picture it shows me the suffragettes having a peaceful demonstration they are smiling and at the same time getting what they want to say across, from my knowledge and understanding suffragettes were seen as violent and they were seen as a very confrontational group. In the source booklet under The WSPU- the suffragettes it tells me that In 1903 Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters formed a breakaway group called the Women's social and political union (WSPU), that was to campaign for the parliamentary vote for women on the same terms as it was granted to men, or would be in the future, their motto was "deeds not words" yet the photo paints a different picture. ...read more.

Middle

Also in the first passage it states "It was a picture of shameless recklessness". This makes the women look disgraceful and outrageous. In Passage two the first four lines say, " One campaigner sprawled in the mud to the obvious disgust of decent men and the obvious delight of others". This gives me the idea that some people found it a revolting and thought they were shameful, but yet some people saw it a something very positive. This source is very negative towards the suffragettes and makes them appear violent and shameful. This really affected the way people viewed the suffragettes. Source E is in favour of the suffragettes and are for the vote for women. This source is a postcard issued by the suffragettes in 1910. This postcard shows what a women may be, such as a mayor, a mother a doctor or even a teacher and still not have vote, then goes on to show what a man may be, such as a convict a lunatic, unfit for service or even a drunkard but yet still get the vote. Women were put in a lower category then these types of men; Suffragettes saw this as an insult. However I feel that both Source D and Source E are very reliable for investigating people's attitudes towards the campaign, but I think the most common attitude towards the suffragettes at that time was Source D. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many women had witnessed the suffering and anguish of men of men as they had not seen in the previous wars and had also worked side by side with comrades and friends. It was inevitable that this would start to change mutual perceptions of and the granting of the votes at last (to women over thirty) seemed totally appropriate." This gives me the impression that people did see the women working really due to the war and did all they could to gain the vote and the only resort and the most appropriate was to give them the vote. In Source 19; Page 66 we are shown a female tram driver it does not give us a date but it shows it shows us that women were enthusiastically involved in a man's role. This acts helped change the way people viewed suffragettes. Before most people attitudes were biased towards giving women the vote, but after the war people attitudes change and However in 1918 the barrier against women's suffrage was broken and a partial victory won, under the Representation of the People Act, women over 30 years of age were given the parliamentary vote if they were householders, the wives of householders, occupiers of property with an annual rent of �5 or more. About 8.5 million women were put under this new law. It was not until ten years later, however, that all women could vote on equal terms with men, at the age of 21 and over, the new bill becoming law on July 2, 1928. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Changes in the role of women in society 1900-1970.

    The feminist woman was also being born in this era. A woman that would overlook the need for equality, and feel that the female's race was superior to the male. Such women would be bringing up daughters to feel this way, and forcing such views on there sons and condemning

  2. The changing role and status of women in Britain since 1900.

    Fortunately for the Suffragette movement, this was to come with the First World War. There were a number of reasons why women failed to win the vote before the war. I think that the biggest reason was people's views on a woman's role in society.

  1. The Changing roles of women

    set everyone talking about votes for women, to keep the subject in the press, to leave the government no peace from it.' Source 24 shows us the types of things they did, including 'heckling at government meetings,' 'start occasional attacks on property,' and 'carry out arson, bombing and sabotage in many areas of Britain.'

  2. The changing role and status of women in Britain since 1900

    The person who wrote this article wanted to send out negative messages about the Suffragettes, and did this maybe by exaggerating what really happened. Despite the fact that the editor of the article was biased, I know from my own knowledge that the protests carried out by the Suffragettes were very much like the one described in source D.

  1. Votes for Women in Britain 1900-1918

    The WSPU were still unable to gain the vote, despite rising violence and extreme methods, as the public (with the help of the government) began to see them as militants and terrorists, and knew that giving in to them would inspire other groups to begin similar violent campaigns in the hope of getting what they wanted too.

  2. The Changing Role and Status of Women in Britain Since 1900

    couldn't possibly know what all the other women that were there were doing. I think this source shows us that at the time of this demonstration the suffragettes work was being recognised by the government but perhaps they were not being taken to seriously as they would of wanted.

  1. The Changing role and status of women in Britain since 19001) ...

    wrong, the writers is quite harsh against the campaigners as he puts them down a lot and doesn't bother any kind of fairness in what he wrights, he makes sure he uses language like disgraceful and shameful. This article was written in a very popular newspaper so it reflected on

  2. Sources D and E are both from 1910, yet theygive very different views about ...

    Knowing this about the author would lead us to believe the article is biased against women and would therefore present them in the most negative light.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work