• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Derby 1913 - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework 2 - Emily Davison and The Derby 1913 1. Source 1 is an account written by Emily Davison referring to her attempts at suicide during her stay at Holloway Prison in January 1912, just over a year before she died at the Derby. She describes in detail her attempts to kill herself, referring to the subject with much ease, and speaks casually of the danger that she faced "I should undoubtedly have been killed." She appears to be a very strong-minded person, as she tried many times to commit suicide, but in a short space of time, again showing her determination when her mind was set on a task. I believe this also shows that maybe she acted on impulse, and that these suicide attempts were not pre-meditated, but were the result of a sudden impulse. It could on the other hand the fact that these suicide attempts were performed only two weeks before she was due to be released, could show that her actions were actually planned, as she patiently waited for her release date to approach before attempting to kill herself. This explanation would seem more plausible as it shows her strong dedication to the Suffragette movement, and her message would be clear to the government: even if they locked the suffragettes up, it wouldn't stop them, but make them more determined in their protest for women's votes. If this was the case, it shows Emily's Davison's resistance to the government's methods of punishment, and that their methods had not affect on her, but in fact made her more willing then ever to sacrifice herself for "the cause." ...read more.


He justifies this by saying "it was impossible to avoid her," immediately taking the blame off both the horse and ride. They make a point of claiming that the fact the horse was the kings was an accident, whereas Emmeline tries to tell the opposite, that Emily was "offering her life as a petition to the king." The journalist also shows his ignorance when he claims she was involved with the Suffragist movement, when in fact it was the Suffragette, showing his lack of research, and blas´┐Ż attitude. 4. I believe this account to be bias, as it states that the Mary Richardson is a "friend of the Pankhurst's," a Suffragette herself, and therefore would share the similar views as Emmeline Pankhurst. The autobiography was published in "1953" 40 years after the Derby 1913, which would increase the chance of mistakes in her accounts. She believed Emily to be a "very serious-minded person," through meeting her "several times," this backs-up my response to question 1, showing her determination when her mind was set on a task. The problem with the source is Mary's unreliability when she saw Emily at the track, she uses the work "seem" three times, as she looked on at Miss. Davison from a "distance," and could not give a more accurate account. Mary goes on to make assumptions, which again mirror those of Emmeline Pankhurst's as to why she gave committed suicide, " she was about to give her life for the cause." She begins to exaggerate, " I was watching her hand. ...read more.


Why would Emily have bothered to prepare, if she was to unceremoniously throw herself at a horse with the intent to kill herself? The flags found folded in her coat pocket also back up this theory, as it would have been more believable that Emily intended to pin the flags to the bridle and misjudged the speed of the horses. The horses near her home would not have compared to the speed of the racehorses at the Derby. The evidence from source G shows strong proof that Emily intended to return the following day to the "suffragette summer festival", using the exact words " She should come every day," showing her intent to return, again suggesting her death was not deliberate, but an unfortunate accident. The last piece of major evidence is the "return half of a rail ticket to London" shown in source I, showing that when she left for the Derby she did not have the intention to commit suicide. Whether she changed her mind after she got the Derby was another matter. I believe there is a strong possibility that she was fully aware of the danger she faced, and that she may have changed her mind when she got to the Derby on whether she would be sacrificing her life or not. This view would explain the train ticket, and the planning of her return. She may have realised once she arrived at the Derby, that she would not survive the stunt she planned. Looking at her character though, it would seem reasonable to assume that she was not the kind of person to back down from a challenge. GCSE History Coursework The Derby 1913 By Emma Raynsford History Coursework Emma Raynsford 11D ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig Coursework

    Another reason why he is right to be negative is in the source he said that Haig was forewarned not to use the tanks, 'he was advised not to use them until they were available in greater numbers' this shows that Haig knew the tanks were not ready but he deployed them nevertheless.

  2. What happened on Derby day 1913?

    I then looked at source 2. Emmeline Pankhurst, the leader of the Suffragettes, wrote this (therefore as it is her autobiography 'My Story,' it contained a lot of her own opinion. The book was written in 1913 and gives the impression Miss. Pankhurst was actually at the Derby, (we know she was actually under house arrest.'

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    (The first female mayor in England). This in m opinion was a really big triumph for women everywhere, for her to get such an important and prestigious job. At the age of seventy-two she joined the suffragettes in 1908 but she left three years later because she didn't like their arson campaign.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    key points and these are only her memories so are only one viewpoint. Source F is from an interview with an evacuee. It tells us that it was quite upsetting for wealthy evacuees to end up in semi slums and visa versa; this was caused by the rudimentary selection of evacuees by hosts.

  1. Windsor Coursework

    I was able to answer the questions I choose to by using my primary research. Secondary research Secondary research is when you use information from an outside source. Where as in primary research you gather the information independently you gather information from places like the internet, library, and magazines.

  2. womens crsk history

    This clearly shows that it is because of the work that women did during the war, not anything before that. On the other hand, I disagree with the interpretation that women had got the right to vote because of the work that they done because there were many other reasons.

  1. Gallipoli - source related study

    Also I believe that Winston Churchill should have given the army a kick up the backside when he found out about their apathy. Hence he is just as much to blame. These are my opinions based on the fact this information is true, it may not be true.

  2. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    they had to lie to him about his achievements in his offensive, as an incentive for him to finally win the war. Haig himself illustrates this, when he says in his diary, ' War cabinet asked many questions, all tending to show that each was more pessimistic than the last'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work