• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The difference of tactics in Vietnam played an important part in the victory of the Vietcong over the far superior United States.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The difference of tactics in Vietnam played an important part in the victory of the Vietcong over the far superior United States. The Vietcong used guerrilla warfare, a form of fighting with the aim to hinder the opposing force. This form of fighting dates back to Sun Tzu a Chinese military strategist who lived over 2000 years ago, he believed that all warfare involves the employing of ones strength to exploit the weaknesses of the enemy. Guerrilla warfare was also successfully adopted by Mao Zedong the leader of the communist's forces in China. The USA were used to conventional warfare, in the form of bouts of fighting, guerrilla warfare ment they had to be constantly alert, for which they were not adequately trained. The strategy and tactics used by the Vietcong were based on those used by Mao Zedong, One important feature was the use of small groups of soldiers called cells. The cells worked together but knowledge of other cells was kept to a minimum, to lower the damage done to the organisation as a whole if one soldier was captured and tortured. The US troops began to use the 'search and destroy tactic' from 1965 to try and find members of theses cells and kill them. ...read more.

Middle

Vietcong began fighting with primitive weapons and booby traps to try and injure the American troops; there were many different types of mines and bamboo staves which they used, one of the most feared was the 'Bouncing Betty'. These traps killed inexperienced soldiers and put the rest of the troops on edge. The Vietcong's considerable knowledge of the local environment also proved to be extremely useful in the war. They could successfully launch ambushes against small groups of American troops, which again proved to be extremely effective in putting the Americans on edge, every time they were in Vietnam. The Vietcong were told not to into combat unless it outnumbered the enemy and was certain of winning. It therefore concentrated its attacks on poorly guarded government positions theses were referred to as 'soft targets'; it often used night attacks to increase the possibility of success. The Vietcong began to collect more and more advanced weapons from the Americans, survey taken by the US army discovered that about 90% of Vietcong weapons captured once belonged to the Americans or ARVN. On the other hand, the US fought from the beginning with some of the most advanced weapons in the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Other chemicals used destroyed crops with the aim of starving the Vietcong, but it was later discovered that the poor crops affected the poor peasants far more, this again made the USA unpopular. The USA believed that with all this modern technology they could not be defeated by a "Raggedy ass 4th rate country" But the Vietcong had many advantages, another of these was the easy movement they had from North Vietnam to and throughout South Vietnam, this was as a result of the Ho Chi Minh trail. This was a complex web of jungle paths with base camps at regular intervals along it, it let soldiers travel from North Vietnam to Saigon in six weeks, it is estimated that the Vietcong received sixty tons of aid per day from the Ho Chi Minh trail. The USA quickly saw the superiority this gave the Vietcong and tried to stop its use. As the trail could not be seen by air it could not be successfully bombed, so the US decided to build the 'McNamara Line', a large barrier of barbed wire and minefield that crossed South Vietnam. Due to repeated attacks by enemy forces during its construction the plan was abandoned in 1967, the Vietcong was left with its advantage of quick supplies from North Vietnam. Another advantage of the Vietcong was its many elaborate Tunnel complexes throughout South Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The author is unknown. This source is a primary source as it comes from the time of the war.

  2. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    anything about it the situation would worsen and affect other areas which would slowly fall to communism. Another question would be who was President Johnson talking to in such an open manner? This conversation took place 10 months before the start of operation rolling thunder.

  1. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    in order to locate enemy defensive positions', dependant on the use of helicopters were introduced. (Summers, Vietnam Almanac) Look at p4 source booklet Pacification was the primary objective of the US war effort in Vietnam. Pacification can be defined as, 'the military, political, economic and social process of establishing or re-establishing local government.'

  2. Military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam in ...

    B52 bombing continued to blast the Vietcong out of the jungle. Again, the Vietcong survived. They lived in underground tunnels and could not be bombed effectively. The US then began to search and destroy the tunnels but this proved to be ineffective, as the Vietcong would ambush the soldiers in the jungles.

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    As a primary source, it's hard to find fault with the photograph - it isn't likely to be redacted so it shows one side over another, and is also fairly neutral as it shows the after-effects of the American incursion, rather than something happening at that very moment.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Haig was warning the public, he was very honest in telling people this, which is why he was so liked. This part of the source does not talk about Haig's skill or efficiency as a soldier but it might help morale and that would help Britain to victory so it

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    By this time, the Americans were reflecting on the French rule and the possible effects of that in the area, on Communism - which was by now a major feature of the U.S. foreign policy. In context, several countries were assuming Communism as their de facto political leaning, including: Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania and Albania.

  2. Did The Power Of Television Force The United States To Leave Vietnam

    The soldiers wanted to be a part of the good America who is there to step in at any time when freedom is threatened by communism a.k.a. ('Truman Doctrine'). As this was due to most soldiers had never been away from home before they approved to enter into the service.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work