• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred in Derry on 30 January 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The events that occurred in Derry on 30 January 1972 became known as 'Bloody Sunday'. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? Refer to sources A, B and C and other interpretations of events from your studies to help you in your answer. British troops were sent to Northern Ireland in 1969 due to genuine concerns about the possibility of civil war in the province. Loyalist and Nationalist attitudes had hardened still further by 1972. The Nationalists saw their cause as a political struggle for independence, with the Army a part of the British state and thus upholding the Unionist cause. As a result, the Army became an object of Nationalist aggression. The emergence of a provisional IRA that believed in violence directed at the army and unionist paramilitaries, and the aggressive response of the Loyalist paramilitary UVF and UDA, led to the introduction of internment in 1971, which meant the arrest and detention of those suspected of sectarian conflict. However, no loyalist paramilitaries were arrested under internment, whereas 1600 nationalists were. ...read more.

Middle

The Saville enquiry into the events of 30th January 1972 was established after campaigns by the victim's families and much of the sources A, B and C are all linked to this enquiry. Source A is an article from a British newspaper that is usually sympathetic to the military. The suggestion that the army was at fault on 30 January 1972 is firmly rebutted. The Daily Mail is known as a conservative newspaper supporting the military, which one would expect to defend their cause Source B is an account of the Bloody Sunday enquiry, suggesting that the army were to blame for the events that occurred, written in The Guardian newspaper. The author describes recent scientific evidence that those killed were posing no threat, as claimed by the Army. Source C is a transcript of a witness witness recalling how he overheard soldiers talk of "clearing the Bog". The account is only taken from one person. The source may be unreliable for giving a sound historical interpretation of Bloody Sunday, though the statement is vivid and credible. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source 12g is from the Londonderry coroner. The coroner says the army "ran amok that day"..."Shooting innocent people". He blames the army for the firing and murder of 13 Catholic men and injury of a further 13. His source is historically close to the events, close to the community, and of a Protestant and military background. This source is particularly revealing. Source 12h is an extract from a book written 15 years after the firings by Patrick Bishop and Eamonn Mallie that seeks to explain the behaviour of the IRA. The source is says there is no way that the rioters could have shot first. The views expressed are divided, as many of the authors either come from a background which would defend the army or from a nationalist background, usually meaning that the source would defend the protestors. Aside from the polarity of background and purpose, the time of writing should be taken into account when examining these sources. Those that appear to have no clear sources of bias may be more useful to the historian in evaluating the event in question. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Free essay

    Which Of The Following Events Has Had The Biggest Impact On The History Of ...

    There are many reasons why bloody Sunday came about but some of the most important are the violence that occurred because of internment. Internment its self boosted support for the IRA because they tried to do everything in their power to stop it; they even helped residents make barricades to keep the troops out.

  2. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    The Partition of Ireland was a political division between an independent Irish State, the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. This was where the protestant majority had preferred to remain part of the UK. This partition had its roots of the Ulster plantation back in the 17th century.

  1. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    In this indirect way, source D agrees with the impression of the marchers from source C Overall, I think that source D agrees with the impression of the marchers given in source C in many ways. However, if the historian only saw source D, it would be difficult to tell why the marchers were there.

  2. Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

    A lot of evidence stands by the protesters. But if in fact they are not telling the truth there are reasons why this could be. The marchers were marching against the policy of interment in Northern Ireland, the unfair right for security forces to arrest without trial.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    of the nationalist community, not just because of the murders on that day, but because of the many years of cover-up and untrue allegations and slurs against these innocent men and boys. The British propaganda machine when set in motion could not be reversed.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    The paratroopers were, and still are, one of the World`s most effective military units, recognised for their ability to fight and win in difficult circumstances. It is a regiment renowned for violence, and yet on Bloody Sunday,it was used for crowd control methods.

  1. The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody ...

    This new evidence presents a new chance for those who they believe are murderers to be put on trial. Another change, which discredits the original evidence, is that "forensic scientist Dr. John Martin, who gave evidence to the Widgery hearing that Mr.

  2. The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody ...

    had simply fired in self-defence after being fired at by IRA gunmen. Nationalists claim that the British soldiers were unprovoked and opened fire either in response to some imaginary threat or, as a deliberate act of violence The two sides give a different view because of who they are and what they want.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work