• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? On January 30th 1972, civil rights activists were involved in a protest march against internment through Londonderry. British paratroopers, who were deployed on the streets, shot and killed 13 of the marchers and wounded others. Many people have different views on what happened and why. The main conflicting views are those of the paratroopers and their supporters and the views of the marchers and the friends and family of those killed. Source A is a newspaper report form the Daily Mail in September 1999. It is a report on new evidence released from the second enquiry into Bloody Sunday, led by Lord Saville. The headline reads "PARAS IN BLOODY SUNDAY EVIDENCE STORM". This headline states the situation that the report is based on. The report includes the opinions of different people on the new evidence. The new evidence suggests that the original tests, which confirmed that some of the protesters shot had been handling firearms or explosives, may have been contaminated. ...read more.

Middle

Source B is another newspaper report, from the Guardian. The headline reads "BLOODY SUNDAY REVELATION. This backs up what we have been saying all these years: the victims were innocent." This immediately indicated that the writer of the article supports the view of the protesters and the families of those killed. This also shows that the article may be biased. The article also does not include the opinion of the Paratroopers or their supporters on the new evidence. As the reporter seems to support the people who claim that the Paratroopers murdered the protesters, he may have decided that their opinions were false and not worth including. The article opens by saying, "The families of 14 people shot dead on Bloody Sunday last night hailed new and independent scientific evidence as a major breakthrough in their 27-year fight to prove that those who died were innocent and defenceless victims of British paratroopers." As with source A, the families would interpret what happened on Bloody Sunday this way as they had little faith in the government protecting them before, and they are certain that none of those killed had shot at the Paratroopers. ...read more.

Conclusion

He claims that the soldiers spoke of "clearing the Bog" and he told ITN "I understood that they would be clearing away the barricades. They said they would be landing with tanks. I got the impression they would be going to Northern Ireland pretty shortly". This statement does not include anything about the debated facts about Bloody Sunday. It is true that the British Paratroopers went into the Bogside area of Londonderry in armoured personnel carriers and cleared away the barricades. Also, Daniel Porter received this information from off-duty soldiers in a pub. This evidence does not support or discredit either the soldiers or the Protesters side of the story. It is possible that Mr Porter came forward with this evidence in an attempt to get media attention. In conclusion, what actually happened on Bloody Sunday is interpreted differently by different people, and always will be. Nobody can be completely sure what actually happened, as many things happened in different places and nobody was watching them all at the same time. The opinion of people living in Londonderry may be influenced by outside influences like IRA presence, and the views of the Paratroopers and the Government may be influenced by an attempt to defend themselves from repercussions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    In 1689 the deposed English king James II, a Catholic, landed in Ireland hoping to raise a rebellion and restore the Roman Catholic Religion. He was defeated at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690 by William of Orange. James attempted to win the support of the Roman Catholics in 1687 only increased the religious tensions.

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    Study all the sources How far do these sources support the view that 'Bloody Sunday' was caused by poor living and working conditions in St Petersburg? I think that, on the whole, the sources do support the view that poor living and working conditions in St Petersburg caused 'Bloody Sunday'.

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    The DUP said that there was going to be a religious rally at the same place on the same date and at the same time as the civil rights march, which was planned for the 30th January 1972. What happened Sunday January On 30, 1972, in an incident since known

  2. Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

    with the peace talks in Ireland and may be to Britains advantage. Also more and more evidence is surfacing against the paras, forensics is coming on leaps and bounds and now more and more can be proved.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Bogside The Bogside is a Catholic area of Derry. It became a place were poverty and unemployment went unchecked. The local poet Seamus Deane once wrote: "Bogside was once a street. Now it's a condition". In the summer of 1969, a three-day battle with the police became so violent that the British Labour government sent in troops to restore order in this estate.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    the United States and Britain were very strained due to the Irish situation. As source A proves, the Widgery report did draw some valid conclusions. Source E is from the actual report, and admits, to a limited level, that some of the mayhem can be attributed to the Paratroopers actions.

  1. The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody ...

    Source C supports that view because it tells of soldiers being heard before Bloody Sunday, talking about "clearing the bog", which is referring to Derry's bog side. However the source also shows that the information could be unreliable as it took place in a pub and could just be hearsay.

  2. Biran Friel, Making History, Historical Background

    Naturally the remaining Irish landlords with any power soon caught on and made no more alliances with Queen Elizabeth. In response, an army of eight hundred men led by Sir Walter Raleigh went in and slaughtered hundreds. The head of the Burkes, Clanrickard, a 'queens' man, was seized and sent to Dublin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work