• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? On January 30th 1972, civil rights activists were involved in a protest march against internment through Londonderry. British paratroopers, who were deployed on the streets, shot and killed 13 of the marchers and wounded others. Many people have different views on what happened and why. The main conflicting views are those of the paratroopers and their supporters and the views of the marchers and the friends and family of those killed. Source A is a newspaper report form the Daily Mail in September 1999. It is a report on new evidence released from the second enquiry into Bloody Sunday, led by Lord Saville. The headline reads "PARAS IN BLOODY SUNDAY EVIDENCE STORM". This headline states the situation that the report is based on. The report includes the opinions of different people on the new evidence. The new evidence suggests that the original tests, which confirmed that some of the protesters shot had been handling firearms or explosives, may have been contaminated. ...read more.

Middle

Source B is another newspaper report, from the Guardian. The headline reads "BLOODY SUNDAY REVELATION. This backs up what we have been saying all these years: the victims were innocent." This immediately indicated that the writer of the article supports the view of the protesters and the families of those killed. This also shows that the article may be biased. The article also does not include the opinion of the Paratroopers or their supporters on the new evidence. As the reporter seems to support the people who claim that the Paratroopers murdered the protesters, he may have decided that their opinions were false and not worth including. The article opens by saying, "The families of 14 people shot dead on Bloody Sunday last night hailed new and independent scientific evidence as a major breakthrough in their 27-year fight to prove that those who died were innocent and defenceless victims of British paratroopers." As with source A, the families would interpret what happened on Bloody Sunday this way as they had little faith in the government protecting them before, and they are certain that none of those killed had shot at the Paratroopers. ...read more.

Conclusion

He claims that the soldiers spoke of "clearing the Bog" and he told ITN "I understood that they would be clearing away the barricades. They said they would be landing with tanks. I got the impression they would be going to Northern Ireland pretty shortly". This statement does not include anything about the debated facts about Bloody Sunday. It is true that the British Paratroopers went into the Bogside area of Londonderry in armoured personnel carriers and cleared away the barricades. Also, Daniel Porter received this information from off-duty soldiers in a pub. This evidence does not support or discredit either the soldiers or the Protesters side of the story. It is possible that Mr Porter came forward with this evidence in an attempt to get media attention. In conclusion, what actually happened on Bloody Sunday is interpreted differently by different people, and always will be. Nobody can be completely sure what actually happened, as many things happened in different places and nobody was watching them all at the same time. The opinion of people living in Londonderry may be influenced by outside influences like IRA presence, and the views of the Paratroopers and the Government may be influenced by an attempt to defend themselves from repercussions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    People joined the march along its entire route. At approximately 3.25pm the march passed the 'Bogside Inn'. Estimates of the number of marchers at this point vary. Some observers put the number as high as 20,000 whereas the Widgery Report estimated the number at between 3,000 and 5,000.

  2. Free essay

    Why has bloody sunday been represented in such different ways?

    Wilford is the officer of the 1st Battalion of Parachute regiment the interview says almost entirely the opposite to the other two sources. Wilford claims that the Gunmen where hit, but his excuse for not being able to find any weapons is that they must have been hidden by comrades.

  1. The events that occurred in Derry on 30 January 1972 became known as Bloody ...

    However, Source 12c gives a very different interpretation. It's a quote from a Catholic priest, who can be assumed to be sympathetic to the protest marchers. The source describes how Father Bradley did not see protesters shooting at the army, but did witness the British troops "indiscriminately" shooting at the rioters.

  2. The Four Events

    People were frightened and thought some thing was going to happen. The long-term affects are that Unionists still welcome British troops as peacekeepers against the threat of the Catholics. They mere presence continued to create suspicion between both groups. The troops made Unionists feel supported and closer to Britain.

  1. Biran Friel, Making History, Historical Background

    They were killed. An army began to march, considering men, women, children, and elderly as 'rebels' to the crown. All were killed who stood in the way of Queen Elizabeth. (adapted from http://home.snu.edu/~dwilliam/f97projects/ireland/EnglishOccupation.html) 3. Battle of Kinsale & Nine Years War: i)

  2. How far are the tensions in Northern Ireland due the events f 30th January ...

    This caused a rebellion within groups of Catholics who felt that it was unjustified why they had their land had been taken off of them too make way for there conflicting Protestants. The tension between the two Christian groups had ignited, and conflict rapidly increased due to the introduction of the Protestant settlers in Ireland.

  1. bloody sunday assignment 1

    The RUC failed to protect the Catholics. This resulted in rioting and barricading of the Bogside area of Derry. Which resulted in the RUC entering the Bogside by breaking down the barricading and ambushing the Catholics. The riots resulted in Terrence O'Neill's forced resignation as Ulster Prime Minister and he

  2. bloody sunday assignment 2

    This forced Brian Frankler to retire in May 1974. The actions of both sides seemed to support the other's interpretations of the events of Bloody Sunday and as so many people disagreed with the Wigery Report, another inquiry was made- this was the Saville Report, it concluded that none of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work