• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred on 30th January 1972 became known as "Bloody Sunday". Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The events that occurred on 30th January 1972 became known as "Bloody Sunday". Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? Refer to sources and other interpretations of the events from your studies to help you with your answer. On January 30th 1972 in Londonderry, British paratroopers opened fire into a Northern Ireland civil rights march holding a protest against a corrupt government. 13 men were injured and another 13 were killed. "Bloody Sunday" set the agenda for over 20 years of violence. The troops claimed that they were fired on and were forced to shoot. The witnesses in the march claimed that those killed had no weapons on them and that the troops started firing for no reason. Leading up to the event there was an ever-growing hostility there had been many civil rights protests from 1968, often they ended in violence. ...read more.

Middle

He explained later how you only have a split second to pull the trigger. One soldier stated that they weren't firing indiscriminately, "why were no women or children killed". Major/ General Robert Ford had a tough, no mercy policy. He used a minimalist method to stop bombers with real ammunition. On the other hand the protestors claimed that the frustrated actions of some marchers resulted in the paratroopers opting for brute, murdering force.. Donaghy admitted throwing stones earlier on but also says "When I was shot I did not have a nail bomb or anything else in my hands." One report told of a man being shot whilst he had his hands in the air. Evidence has shown that when the bodies of those killed were found, all but one (a member of the IRA youth) had no weapons on them. The British Government commissioned a report into what soon became known as 'Bloody Sunday.' ...read more.

Conclusion

Tony Blair and Lord Saville re-opened the Inquiry into Bloody Sunday. It involved 1,500 witness accounts and many new stories were reported; Daniel Porter claimed some off-duty troops in an English pub told him of their plan, "they said they would be going to Derry to 'clear the bog'" this however this is clearly bravado as the pub would have been loud. It was also discovered that the lead found on victims hands (W. Nash and J. Young) could have been from another person contaminated with lead or from emissions like car exhausts. The key reason why "Bloody Sunday" has and so many different interpretations are because the paratroopers and IRA had too much to loose; this was the obstacle for reconciliation and peace in Ireland. Despite the large number of eye-whiteness accounts it appears that propaganda prevailed over truth. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Biran Friel, Making History, Historical Background

    Thus his own family exemplifies the divisions between traditional and modern Ulster and Ireland, a recurring theme for Friel. Donegal is another influence that features strongly in Friel's life and work. He moved there in 1969 because he always felt his roots lay in Donegal "partly to get into the

  2. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    the black people in South Africa because they too were seen as second-class citizens because of the colour of their skin. They two were divided and split into several states having a community of black people and a community of white people.

  1. The events that took place on Bloody Sunday, 30th January 1972 have been discussed ...

    Simon Winchester��s views of Bloody Sunday are taken from a different perspective, his report of the event was written for the Guardian, a paper that is known to support Catholicism. In his report of the series of events, he claims that the paratroopers arrived in armoured cars and started firing, unprovoked, at the crowds of Catholic protestors.

  2. How far are the tensions in Northern Ireland due the events f 30th January ...

    There were 3 groups of settlers who came to Ireland between 100BC-AD1500. The Gaels landed first before the birth of Christ and the Vikings followed who were flanked by the Normans a few centuries later. People that follow the group called the Irish Nationalists originate from the first settlers in Ireland.

  1. bloody sunday assignment 1

    the rights of the individual; � To highlight all possible abuses of power; � To demand guarantees for freedom of speech, assembly and association (belonging to a trade union); � To inform the public of their lawful rights. In particular the aim was to end all discrimination.

  2. Northern Irelandsince c.1960 - questions and answers

    The Protestant civilians and the government have two completely different perspectives on Catholics. 3. Why were British troops sent to Northern Ireland in August 1969? The main reason for the input of British troops in Northern Ireland in August 1969 is the riots which were creating havoc and were too

  1. The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody ...

    This new evidence presents a new chance for those who they believe are murderers to be put on trial. Another change, which discredits the original evidence, is that "forensic scientist Dr. John Martin, who gave evidence to the Widgery hearing that Mr.

  2. Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

    If a soldier had admitted that the army did fire on innocent civilians other soldiers may have struck out against him. Although if the Army did decide to change there story it could be seen why. One reason would be to appease the government in Ireland, this may have helped

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work