• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred on 30th January 1972 became known as "Bloody Sunday". Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...


The events that occurred on 30th January 1972 became known as "Bloody Sunday". Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? Refer to sources and other interpretations of the events from your studies to help you with your answer. On January 30th 1972 in Londonderry, British paratroopers opened fire into a Northern Ireland civil rights march holding a protest against a corrupt government. 13 men were injured and another 13 were killed. "Bloody Sunday" set the agenda for over 20 years of violence. The troops claimed that they were fired on and were forced to shoot. The witnesses in the march claimed that those killed had no weapons on them and that the troops started firing for no reason. Leading up to the event there was an ever-growing hostility there had been many civil rights protests from 1968, often they ended in violence. ...read more.


He explained later how you only have a split second to pull the trigger. One soldier stated that they weren't firing indiscriminately, "why were no women or children killed". Major/ General Robert Ford had a tough, no mercy policy. He used a minimalist method to stop bombers with real ammunition. On the other hand the protestors claimed that the frustrated actions of some marchers resulted in the paratroopers opting for brute, murdering force.. Donaghy admitted throwing stones earlier on but also says "When I was shot I did not have a nail bomb or anything else in my hands." One report told of a man being shot whilst he had his hands in the air. Evidence has shown that when the bodies of those killed were found, all but one (a member of the IRA youth) had no weapons on them. The British Government commissioned a report into what soon became known as 'Bloody Sunday.' ...read more.


Tony Blair and Lord Saville re-opened the Inquiry into Bloody Sunday. It involved 1,500 witness accounts and many new stories were reported; Daniel Porter claimed some off-duty troops in an English pub told him of their plan, "they said they would be going to Derry to 'clear the bog'" this however this is clearly bravado as the pub would have been loud. It was also discovered that the lead found on victims hands (W. Nash and J. Young) could have been from another person contaminated with lead or from emissions like car exhausts. The key reason why "Bloody Sunday" has and so many different interpretations are because the paratroopers and IRA had too much to loose; this was the obstacle for reconciliation and peace in Ireland. Despite the large number of eye-whiteness accounts it appears that propaganda prevailed over truth. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    English landlords were blamed for the famine, as the tenants couldn't pay their rent. The British Government where seen as unresponsive to the plight of Catholics. This action showed the division between Catholics and Protestants. This showed that the protestants were behaving as they had intended, being English and different from Irish Catholics and holding political power.

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    probably not at the palace and so could not draw the picture from memory. Although the artist may have spoken to people who were at the 'Bloody Sunday' massacre, they were probably supporting the marchers and so the picture, like most, makes the soldiers look violent and the marchers weak and vulnerable.

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    In the following twenty years, the Provisional IRA and other smaller republican groups such as the Irish National Liberation Army (INLA) mounted a campaign of what they described as 'war' on the 'British,' by which they meant the RUC, the British Army, the Ulster Defence Regiment of the British Army, and the Protestant and Unionist community).

  2. Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

    So they could me bias because the people are obviously feeling badly towards the Army for shooting them and putting them in such a state. Because they were being interviewed by the BBC they might have seen it as a chance to get back at the paras.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    He concluded that the soldiers had been fired on first yet there was no evidence that the dead or wounded had been shot while handling weapons. The Londonderry Coroner, Major Hubert O'Neill, did not share his conclusions. He said what had occurred was "sheer unadulterated murder".

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    In this way it could be compared to Source D, but the source is far less reliable in general: some of the points raised in this source are simply not justified, or proved by anything other than itself. There is also doubt over just how much could be seen: a bit like Source C.

  1. The events that occurred in Derry on 30th January 1979 became known as Bloody ...

    This new evidence presents a new chance for those who they believe are murderers to be put on trial. Another change, which discredits the original evidence, is that "forensic scientist Dr. John Martin, who gave evidence to the Widgery hearing that Mr.

  2. The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody ...

    The Republicans of Northern Ireland are seen by some to be determined to humiliate the British authorities by demanding an independent investigation, which is still on going today. Until recently, the British Government has always accepted the view of the British Army, shown in the 'Widgery Report', that its soldiers

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work