• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that took place on Bloody Sunday, 30th January 1972 have been discussed frequently and certain aspects of the event highly debated.

Extracts from this document...


The events that took place on Bloody Sunday, 30th January 1972 have been discussed frequently and certain aspects of the event highly debated. The events of the particular day were of significant influence in further procedures in N. Ireland an on other related events. The event began after an illegal march took place in the centre of Derry, N. Ireland; the police and government banned the march as it was thought it would provoke violence. The march was lead by Catholic supporters who were demonstrating for Catholic rights, the Protestant-biased government and the internment of Catholics. As the march approached the city centre where Army barricades were set up, the first shot of many was fired. The question of who was to blame was then introduced, with neither the Army nor the Catholic marchers accepting responsibility. Thirteen people were found dead after the incident with may others left injured. With neither side accepting blame for the incident and instead blaming the incident on the opposition, the question of who is to blame is a difficult one. It is thought that the previous violence of the summer of 1969, particularly the Battle of Bogside, in which Catholics violently fought with the RUC and B Specials, provoked the introduction of the British Army. ...read more.


Using the sources we can gain some information concerning what the motives of the Paratroopers were and what there original intentions were. Source F claims that the Paratroopers acted very violently and without provocation. The source also states that the Paratroopers had to be restrained by their own NCOs when they ��began wielding their batons fiercely on their own men.�� This suggests that the paratroopers were totally out of control and that their objectives were unclear as they were being restrained. However, the source does take evidence from a Daily Telegraph reporter, a newspaper that openly supports rightwing parties, and is also written by an Irishman, Tim Pat Coogan, who is likely to be Catholic, therefore the evidence cannot be trusted as it could be biased and was also published in 1995, some time after the original events had taken place. Source G claims that Lieutenant General Tuzo thought that a low key strategy to avoid confrontation was the advisable course.�� Although the source later states that Faulkner opposed the low key strategy and thought that a hard line must be taken. These two contradictive ideas create the theory of questionable motives by the paratroopers, which supports the ideas brought about in source F, as many paratroopers probably opposed the orders that were given to them, or simply disagreed with them. ...read more.


Because of all the different views of the event and different accounts of what happened, it has proved difficult to reach an agreement on what happened on Bloody Sunday and as the event goes further back in History, the evidence provided will become even more unreliable without a dramatic breakthrough, meaning that it is highly likely that the exact events of what happened on Black Sunday will remain unknown to those that were not present. Many factors have affected this, least of all the complexity of the event and whether or not it was intended as a peaceful protest given that the march was declared illegal and therefore should never have taken place. Also given the depth of emotion on the day, as well as after, as the paratroopers were left in a difficult position, Brian Faulkner wanting a tough approach and Catholics protesting against internment; which was declared illegal by the European court, lead to a very aggressive situation with both sides having significant reasons for violence. Therefore certainty can never really be considered and whether or not an agreement will be reached on what happened on Bloody Sunday is debatable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. 'Across the Barricades' is a novel written by Joan Lingard.

    Mr Blake's area seems very peaceful and a place where both religions can get along. It as a safe place. Since there's already a mixed couple in the area people may accept Kevin and Sadie more. When Sadie and Kevin begin to go out Mr Blake gets threats and eventually murdered.

  2. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    the first time at Stormont Castle, the first Republican encounters with a British premier since Michael Collins negotiated the partition of Ireland in 1921. In January 1998 Sinn Fein formally rejected the British and Irish governments' new proposals for a settlement and the next phase of the talks was aborted because of a series of Republican and Loyalist killings.

  1. What Happened at Sharpeville on 21st March 1960?Massacre or Self-Defence?

    The writer from this Source also talked of how "some kids waved to the policemen sitting on the Saracens." There did not seem to be any acknowledgement of tension between the two sides, which makes it harder to accept that such a traumatic event occurred only a few hours after.

  2. Why Did ‘Bloody Sunday’ Take Place? (Russian History Sources Question)

    Overall, I think that a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' would find both sources as equally useful, just in different areas. b) Source D is a painting, painted in 1910, and it shows many poor men, women and children, that look frightened, helpless, scared and intimidated by the soldiers that are

  1. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    the historian should disregard it because of this, as the source could be useful for some purpose. d) Study Source F How do you think people in France would have reacted to this source? I think people in France would have felt sympathy for the marchers and anger at the Russian government when they saw the picture.

  2. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    in overall command of the operation to control the march for the 30th of January. Two days later, on the 27th two RUC officers were shot dead in an attack on their patrol car, they were shot on Creggan road in Derry.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    They have fought in many fierce fights some of which being against Arab Tribesmen in Aden in the late 1960s. Fifty percent of the SAS were former Paras. When the marchers heard that this Parachute Regiment was going to be controlling the march, fear arose.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    The evidence surrounding Bloody Sunday can be both sparse and unreliable. As almost all the evidence is to be had from either the Catholic marchers or the soldiers involved, there can tend to be a deal of bias in the evidence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work