• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Failure of the League of Nations.

Extracts from this document...


The Failure of the League of Nations Include a conclusion from both crises pointing out how it led to the fall of the League of Nations as a respectable organization in solving international disputes. The failure of the League in 1930's was due to the poor actions the League made towards many countries' dispute. The actions made by the league when the invasion of Manchuria and Abyssinia took place, were clear examples that showed us that the League was destined to failure. Ever since the Wall Street crash, the world's economy was in chaos in the 1930's and there was no space left for international relations. Whenever any international dispute came present, countries acted in their interest and so did the league. We are going to see two cases (Manchuria and Abyssinia) where the League failed to act as "a general association of nations." ...read more.


But member countries such as the USSR, Britain and France did not want to risk their own armies and battleships on Japan. Therefore no action was made. Another incident that marked the beginning of the end of the League was the Abyssinia crisis. During the mid 30's there was tension between the allies (Britain and France) and Hitler. Italy was a major ally for Britain and France. They did not want to lose Italy as an ally, so they turned a blind eye for their actions. Italy invaded Abyssinia in 1935 to distract the people from major conflicts at home. The Abyssinian emperor appealed the League for help. But instead of helping the Abyssinians, the League turned a blind eye for their actions. The British and French even signed the Stresa Pact with Italy, which the British and French would turn a blind eye towards all actions made in Abyssinia in return for joining them against Germany. ...read more.


Later on, the Abyssinia case was even dismissed because of the major issues that Britain and France were dealing with Germany. To sum this up, these two cases marked the beginning of the end of the League of Nations. After the Abyssinian crisis, a third in a series of major failures followed. It also demonstrated that member countries acted upon their own interest rather than help each other to solve disputes. These two cases also included characteristics that eventually led to the collapse of the League of Nations. Dominant powers such as Britain and France were not interested on disputes and only used them to solve their problems (e.g. Blind eye for Italy for alliance). The League's decisions were very slow and it encouraged the aggressor to maintain its plan (e.g. Manchurian Crisis). Because of its actions towards disputes, countries started to lose faith on the League and followed the example from many countries, to act upon their own interest. Karen Chang 9th Aztec ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    The League was powerless. They discussed economic sanctions but decided without America, Japans main trading partner, that this would be pointless. Eventually Japan withdrew from the league in March 1933. The League did nothing as Britain and France could not afford to stop trading with Japan and The League had no military power.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.


    Evidence from the inscriptions showed that Athens took a strong hold on judgemental affairs and concerns with law and order. The Erythrae Decree marked the beginning of Athens involvement in legal affairs of treason. As time went on, Athens assured that all legal trials were to take place in Athenian law courts.

  2. The League of Nations

    It was seen as more serious than the League's other failures in the 1920s because it showed that the League couldn't even be successful in achieving one of its core objectives. The Manchurian crisis was a major crisis for the League to deal with.

  1. History - International Relation Coursework

    Explain your answer, referring to (i), (ii) and (iii). [10] 9 (a) What were the main aims of Hitler's foreign policy in the 1930s? [4] (b) Why did Neville Chamberlain agree to give the Sudetenland to Germany in September 1938? [6] (c) "The war that broke out in September 1939 was Hitler's war: he wanted it, he planned it."

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work