• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Failure of the League of Nations.

Extracts from this document...


The Failure of the League of Nations Include a conclusion from both crises pointing out how it led to the fall of the League of Nations as a respectable organization in solving international disputes. The failure of the League in 1930's was due to the poor actions the League made towards many countries' dispute. The actions made by the league when the invasion of Manchuria and Abyssinia took place, were clear examples that showed us that the League was destined to failure. Ever since the Wall Street crash, the world's economy was in chaos in the 1930's and there was no space left for international relations. Whenever any international dispute came present, countries acted in their interest and so did the league. We are going to see two cases (Manchuria and Abyssinia) where the League failed to act as "a general association of nations." ...read more.


But member countries such as the USSR, Britain and France did not want to risk their own armies and battleships on Japan. Therefore no action was made. Another incident that marked the beginning of the end of the League was the Abyssinia crisis. During the mid 30's there was tension between the allies (Britain and France) and Hitler. Italy was a major ally for Britain and France. They did not want to lose Italy as an ally, so they turned a blind eye for their actions. Italy invaded Abyssinia in 1935 to distract the people from major conflicts at home. The Abyssinian emperor appealed the League for help. But instead of helping the Abyssinians, the League turned a blind eye for their actions. The British and French even signed the Stresa Pact with Italy, which the British and French would turn a blind eye towards all actions made in Abyssinia in return for joining them against Germany. ...read more.


Later on, the Abyssinia case was even dismissed because of the major issues that Britain and France were dealing with Germany. To sum this up, these two cases marked the beginning of the end of the League of Nations. After the Abyssinian crisis, a third in a series of major failures followed. It also demonstrated that member countries acted upon their own interest rather than help each other to solve disputes. These two cases also included characteristics that eventually led to the collapse of the League of Nations. Dominant powers such as Britain and France were not interested on disputes and only used them to solve their problems (e.g. Blind eye for Italy for alliance). The League's decisions were very slow and it encouraged the aggressor to maintain its plan (e.g. Manchurian Crisis). Because of its actions towards disputes, countries started to lose faith on the League and followed the example from many countries, to act upon their own interest. Karen Chang 9th Aztec ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    The League was powerless. They discussed economic sanctions but decided without America, Japans main trading partner, that this would be pointless. Eventually Japan withdrew from the league in March 1933. The League did nothing as Britain and France could not afford to stop trading with Japan and The League had no military power.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    left in the league were seen to have secret meetings with Italy. This greatly undermined the belief in the league. Also, people in Europe thought that Japan was so far away from them that they didn't need to worry too much about what occurred somewhere on the other side of the world.


    Having no defence from Sparta, Thasos had to except Athenian terms - 'Their walls were demolished and their navy surrendered; they were ordered to pay an indemnity immediately and to pay tribute in future'. The revolt of Thasos was a significant turning point in the progress of Athens' rise to imperialism.

  1. History - International Relation Coursework

    [4] (b) Explain why some major nations were not members of the League when it was first set up. [6] (c) "The most important reason why the League was weak was that it made decisions very slowly." Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. [10] [1999] 12 (a)

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    However, a bigger problem was facing the Conference- what was to be done about Germany. They had been in the League for six years, and most people agreed that they should be treated more fairly than the Treaty of Versailles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work