• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The fall of the Romanov Dynasty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Claire Champion Oral history Assessment 3/19/2002 The fall of the Romanov Dynasty Many factors led to the dramatic and bloody fall of the Romanov dynasty. It is hard to distinguish between a reliable source and a biased one, in order to decide which of these factors held the most baring on the situation. One can generally say that the Tsar's incompetence, the poor living conditions of the Russian people, the collapse of formal control over rules and justice, and the peoples frustration with their never changing and stagnant situation, lead to the crumbling of the royal family which had ruled over Russia for over three hundred years. In order to come to a conclusion as to what actually happened in any given situation, one must be able to look at a variety of different sources and have the ability to link them all together in order to form a broad view rather than what one may call " fact." Comments made my Nicholas II (On becoming Tsar in 1894) "What is going to happen to me...I am not prepared to be the Tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling. I have no idea even how to talk to ministers." (In reply to a letter from his wife in 1916 urging him to be a strong ruler) "-Tender thanks for the severe written scholding. Your poor little weak-willed hubby." ...read more.

Middle

Because Nicholas's lack of political knowledge and stubbornness to change was the root of the problems facing Russia in the beginning of the 20th century, a researcher could gain no better opinion and knowledge of the Tsar than from the Tsar himself. A king has no nation without its people. The ordinary man can combine his efforts with those like him creating manpower that is enough to overthrow any institution. As Nicholas continued his refusal in making significant changes to the way he ruled over Russia, his public opinion continued to dwindle. The Russian people where forced to do something; they starved from absence of food and froze in the harsh Russian winters due to lack of fuel for fire. In a last peaceful and desperate plea, the people rallied and wrote a petition demanding Nicholas to end their suffering: "We working men and inhabitants of St Petersburg...have come to you, our ruler, in a quest of justice and protection. We have become beggars, we have been oppressed. We are treated as slaves...do not refuse assistance to your people...end the oppressive behavior of your officials towards them. Destroy the walls between yourself and your people...we have only two ways, towards liberty and happiness, or into the grave." This source depicts the overall public opinion of the people, and the conditions they where forced to face every day. They where on the verge of death and they where desperate for change. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was not uncommon in the past years of Russian history, but this time soldiers refused to shoot at the rioters. In fact, they joined them, after all, they where peasants themselves, they also starved and they also where freezing. There was no longer any way to control the revolution; the police force had dissolved itself into the masses of angry, spontaneous revolutionaries who could not be stopped. The Duma decided to take over the government due to the lack of law and order, and because Nicholas was unable to make it back to St Petersburg, he had no choice but to accept his fate and abdicate his thrown. The Romanov Dynasty was no more. Textbooks are made to summarize the important and key events of a situation and present them in a way which allows easy interpretation for all people. They are a valid and reliable source, and are good to use when trying to look at many smaller incidents that lead to one major effect, like all the events of 1917. Trotsky wrote, " the dynasty fell by shaking, like rotten fruit." The Russian revolution was due to the slow rotting of the outdated system of an absolute monarchy. Nicholas's lack of understanding and adverse to change would cause his ultimate decline, and catapult Russia into deep economic, social and political changes which would continue to effect the way people believed the world should be run. The interpretation of sources and their linking to each other have allowed us to shape history to be an honest representation of these such past realities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    However, the grievances Rodzianko comments about had a history. The small group of workers that had started the demonstrations over the price of bread allowed the more extremist views of the workers to be voiced. It was not the price of bread that caused the revolution, not like Source A assumes.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Although most of it is true, it cannot be very reliable as at this time Bukharin knew that eventually Stalin was going to have him executed and therefore just tried to get him message across in the most exaggerated way possible.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    In Source G, General Ruzsky suggested that the best course of action would have been to call a congress of the heads of the Zemstvos and request for their co-operation. Should the Tsar fail to use the Zemstvos to organise the war effort then it could be seen that the

  2. Stalin man or monster

    as it was an autobiography and hence written by Stalin himself, who could have deciphered crucial information and in addition to this no other witness is there to confirm the story. The words Stalin uses and the style this source is written portrays him as an empathetic considerate man.

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    Source A and Source B I believe tend to focus on the actual events of the actual day its self instead of all the things that happened to increase the publics enthusiasm for a march and what the Tsar did or in fact didn't do to make the people want to march for a better life.

  2. "What caused the Russian people to act in such a radical manner as to ...

    Russia's performance in the war exposed the corruption and inefficiency of the government and greatly undermined its authority over the people. Near the end of the Russo-Japanese war, in 1905, a priest, Father Gapon, who was one of the organisers of a trade union, decided to put together a petition and present it to the Tsar at his Winter Palace.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Although agricultural infrastructure had been improved, actual production was adversely affected, because labor was diverted to steel production and other projects. Economic ministries, which had been seriously affected by the anti-rightist campaign, gave inaccurate reporting and planning, thereby worsening the economic situation.

  2. What caused the Romanov Dynasty to fall? Explain the fall and decline of the ...

    Failed harvests, inflation, and economic depression saw Russia's peasants and urban workers increasingly resort to riots, demonstrations, and strikes to protest at their poor conditions. Russians people demanded the redress of numerous political, social, and economic problems. The Tsar persisted in the belief that to grant reforms would undermine his autocratic power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work