• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

Extracts from this document...


I believe both views contributed to the fall of Tsarism in Russia. Some sources suggest that autocracy is outdated and the reason for the collapse of Tsarist Russia. However, other sources suggest that without the complications of war, Russia may have prospered. Tolstoy and Kokovstov both have conflicting views. Tolstoy the pessimist, believed that autocracy was an outdated form of government not suited to 20th Century Russia. However Kokovstov the optimist thought that Russia would have prospered if it wasn't for the Great War. Source C uses an extract taken from Tolstoy's letter to Tsar Nicholas II, three years before the revolution of 1905. There was a significant growth in the army of secret police, which indicates that the Tsar is not strong enough and needs a personal army to enforce his authority. This is proved in events such as Bloody Sunday whereby police open fire on innocent workers in a peaceful protest for requesting descent pay and conditions. Russia had now become a police state. As people are attacked for open thought and speech, this furthermore proves Tolstoy's argument, "autocracy is outdated". "The policy of censorship continued to produce meaningless bans" indicates that the government was out of touch with the Russian citizens. This situation could be compared with Nazi Germany because Russia appears to be a police state. Religious persecution was at its worst, which shows that the Tsar was very dependant on Orthodox Christians because they believed he was ordained by God. The situation was getting worse because the government's policy of increasing taxes had failed and now peasants were starving. This highlights the government's incompetence. 'As a result, all classes are openly hostile to the Tsarist government'. This indicates that the Tsar could not control all the classes, he had only got the secret army and police state on his side. In this extract, Tolstoy states that the prisons are overcrowded meaning that people are willing to go to prison for their beliefs. ...read more.


and Germany. Source A does not show any evidence for the optimistic view, Kokovstov's idea, "Without war Tsarist Russia would have survived and prospered". The reason for this is because at this time there was not a great threat of war. However it does suggest reasons for the Pessimist view, Tolstoy's idea, "Autocracy is an outdated form of government not suited to twentieth century Russia". This is because while the Tsar had power over the country, it was kept industrially behind. In this section I am going to compare Source E and Source J. Source E is a painting, although it resembles a photo, that shows Tsar Nicholas II blessing his troops in 1914. His infantry soldiers are kneeling down to him whilst other troops, higher up in rank, are mounted on horses. Source J is a photograph of soldiers in Petrograd supporting the revolution in March 1917. These soldiers are all dressed warmly and have their swords drawn as if they are willing to challenge the Tsar. The image shown in Source E is a painting and is more questionable because of the fact that it is a painting. The artist controls every aspect of the painting and so it is possible that this source could have been used as propaganda. This suggests that Source E could be unreliable. Source J, although a photo, could have also been controlled as well. In the photograph, one can see all the troops' faces and they are all staring at the camera. There is also a banner in the background and the words are also visible to the viewer of the photo. Of course this aspect may be coincidence, but it suggests that Source J was a posed photograph. The image portrayed in Source E shows that the soldiers are demonstrating their loyalty and their respect to the Tsar by kneeling down. This indicates that the soldiers' loyalty is not in question. ...read more.


The Tsarina looks lovingly at the Tsar which is ironic because she has been rumoured of having an affair with Rasputin. The crown is on the Tsarina's head as if to symbolise the fact that at that time she was the one with the power while the Tsar was away. Rasputin's hand is around the Tsarina, this could suggest two possibilities. Either to represent that he almost has a grip on the Tsarina, a grip on power over Russia because she is governing Russia at that time. In conclusion this evidence supports Tolstoy's idea, "Autocracy is an outdated...", because it portrays how blind and oblivious the Tsar was to the activities back 'home'. It also demonstrates how impressionable the Tsarina was and how Rasputin was able to influence the organization of Russia but again it was war that highlighted this weakness and therefore provides evidence for Kokovstov. In conclusion to this essay, I believe both views contribute to the fall of Tsarism in Russia. V. N. Kokovstov is right because it was the war that highlighted the outdated form of government in Russia. However Kokovstov is not completely correct as it may have been that without war, Tsarism in Russia may have still collapsed. Tolstoy's idea appears to contribute more as it is clear that autocracy was out of date. The Tsar tried to handle too much responsibility all on his own. The Russian people were extremely dissatisfied with Tsarism. Tsar Nicholas II was gradually losing everything from the people of Russia to his own personal army. The effects of war caused the necessary levels of resentment to topple the Tsar therefore had Tsarism not been out of date, maybe the war would have not been such a problem. I will side with L. Tolstoy as all of my conclusions lead me to believe that Tsarism was definitely out of date and for this reason a revolution was inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Use source A and your knowledge of the period to explain why some people ...

    Study sources J and K Q7. Which of the two sources gives the more reliable evidence of living standards in Russia at the time? Looking at source J the conversation between the villagers sounds believable but does not give enough information of living standards in Russia comparing to source K.

  2. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    When Russia entered into WW1 the vast majority of peasants were still fighting for their individual land. But it was not a mere desire for land that constituted such a powerful political incentive; the peasants believed they had a right to the land as they had maintained and worked on it.

  1. Factors leading to the fall of the Russian Tsar.

    During this chaotic period there were frequent mutinies and many strikes. When the Provisional Government chose to continue fighting the war with Germany, the Bolsheviks and other socialist factions campaigned for the abandonment of the war effort. The Bolsheviks formed workers militias under their control into the Red Guards (later the Red Army)

  2. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia? ...

    that the public don't really prefer him and that he is simply dragging the system on without any support or direction. Tolstoy says that "all classes were openly hostile to the Tsarist government" and one of the reasons for this hostility is the fact there was no conviction in the

  1. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism

    In the letters Rasputin is often referred to as 'Our friend' showing that the tsarina did respect him However although she was sending letters to the tsar about what to do it is highly doubtful that although his views were in there the tsar paid any attention to the letters whatsoever especially when it came to making crucial decisions.

  2. History - Russia

    that, 'The bodies were chopped into pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid'. The differences in these stories are fairly unexplained, as the Sources A and C, state in the provenance that they both come from the findings of Judge Sergeyev - whilst Source B states it in the actual source information.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    However it can be argued that this deception that Stalin had wasn't part of a personality that made him a monster. Deception is a human characteristic that some people have, and Stalin being suppressed not only in his childhood but by Lenin himself it would be very understanding to see

  2. Tsar's Russia & revolution, Hitler's rise to power revison notes.

    Women's Place: * Church, Cooking and Children * Prizes given for women with most children * No make-up trousers * No diet - bad for child birth * Forced to give careers up Modal Answers 2004 Late Germany - Hitler A)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work