• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The February Revolution 1917 - Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall?

Extracts from this document...


Russia 1905-1914 The February Revolution 1917 Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall? In Durnovo's memorandum 1914, he states that a long war is imminent and that Russia is not ready for it. They would lose causing the government to be blamed resulting in complete social revolution. Durnovo was completely right. He predicted that war would break out which it did later in 1914 with Germany. Russia then suffered heavy losses after the battle of Tannenberg 1914 and the loss of Russian Poland 1915. Then Nicholas decided to make himself commander-in-chief of the army but Russia still took heavy losses. As a result of this, just as Durnovo predicted, the government were blamed which resulted in a complete social revolution in February 1917. Source B is Alexandra's view of what is happening in 1917 a few days before complete revolution broke out. It says that people are protesting only to get attention and that everything will pass when they get bored, cold or hungry. It gives the impression that the situation is not serious at all and if it is ignored, it will go away. Source C is Rodzianko's view of what is happening also written in 1917, just before complete revolution broke out. ...read more.


Source D shows the sheer number of workers that are on strike by the 25th February. This is a reason for the Tsar to abdicate because it shows that the strikes are very serious and that he may easily loose control of the city, Source E again gives the Tsar a reason to abdicate because it shows that revolution is inevitable and he is going to loose control. In Source F, soldiers are shown to be very serious about revolution and carry banners saying 'Down with the Tsar. Long live the republic'. These same soldiers, the day before had shot down demonstrators and therefore it is now obvious that all control is lost and there is almost no hope of regaining the people's support. Source G shows that the capital is in complete chaos and a new government is wanted and needed. It also shows that Nicholas ignored all the warnings given to him. This is a reason for his abdication because again, it shows that Nicholas has lost all control and is not wanted anymore. All these reasons show why Nicholas abdicated because when they are combined they show that there is no hope for Nicholas any more and the capital is in complete ruin and everyone blames him for it. ...read more.


Also if Nicholas had not been so oblivious to what was going on around him and listened to Rodzianko then maybe the revolution wouldn't have happened. However he chose to ignore any warnings, which meant that he was responsible for allowing the situation to get out of control However some people may argue that a revolution in Russia was inevitable for several reasons. First off, Russia was backward and different from other great powers like Britain, France and Germany, who all had elected parliaments and political parties, the Tsar ruled alone as and autocrat. Industrialisation had not yet happened in Russia as in the other great countries, and peasants made up 80% of it. However the peasants were not happy because they wanted the nobles land, because they worked on it and thought it rightly belonged to them. The workers were also not happy because of increasingly bad working and living conditions. For these reasons, it is also shown that although it was Nicholas who triggered of the revolution in February 1917, a revolution was bound to happen some time in Russia. However this is from other historical knowledge and when only looking at the sources, it is obvious that it was Nicholas' fault that the situation got out of hand in Petrograd in 1917. Juri Gregurec ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    As the people moved closer to the palace they faced a line of Cossack Calvary and with one command from the captain the troops began to shoot at the crowds and throw their swords into the crowds of people killing hundreds.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    The peasants had be campaigning for more land as their numbers were increasing fast and the Nobles still had most of the land. The peasants also wanted to get rid of the Tsars altogether as they felt they weren't treated fairly under the system.

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    She would not work with Duma at all. She still believed that the Tsar and herself was appointed to rule Russia by God and dismissed all the able ministers, who were then replaced by 'our men', meaning men who would do what they were told without arguing or who were friends of Rasputin.

  2. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    The French in addition had contributed to scientific research in internationally , including England and were significant contributors to the Public Health Acts . The Public Health Acts had also included every citizen , no matter what status , to have fresh water pumped to their house for a small

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    him on, was his decision to take control of the army and leaving Petrograd. He was inexperienced when it came to military affairs and generally prevented the wiser army officials from making decisions. This not only focused the blame on him but it also left his wife Empress Alexandra, who was heavily influenced by Rasputin, in charge of Russia.

  2. The February Revolution 1917.

    Source C shows support for source A in that it shows a peaceful protest were a large number of women are aggressively protesting. However again on the pavement it seems to show the army men with guns, but as a mark of respect the army men do not open fire

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    The people that were assigned to the "show trials" were the men who were personally close to Stalin and who assisted him in his rise to power. Stalin told the public that those who were put on trial were guilty of the crime of treason and this resulted in the death penalty.

  2. Was there a revolution in Germany in 1918?

    In the instance where an SPD leader Scheidemann declared Germany as a republic Ebert could have kept the fact in mind that the objective of the revolution was to achieve a republican government rather than rowing Scheidemann for acting too quickly and 'illegally'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work