• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The February Revolution 1917.

Extracts from this document...


The February Revolution 1917 From Source A I can learn that events in Petrograd in early 1917 were in a daunting state. It says the workers were on the "verge of despair" meaning that they were at boiling point and one; bad move by the Tsar would cause a massive eruption of angry protestors to start rebelling. People can't stand any of this nonsense any more. The Tsar had pushed everyone too much. This leaves the military men to have no other choice, but to join the protestors. This suggests that the Tsar's abdication is going to happen imminently. From this source we should think this information is accurate because it was written at the time of the event, also this is a non-biased source From sources B+C, I can see that there is a degree of support but they do this in different ways. Source B shows support for source A where it says "Now everything depends on the behaviour of the military units; if they do not join the working class, the movement will quickly subside" this linked in source B as the army general stops and tell the lady off for stealing bread, because he has not joined, the crowd smash his car up. ...read more.


because he is one of the people. Him and the protestors wanted rid of the Tsar and they wanted imminent change. Some suggestions are that they would rather have a democracy, a constitutional monarchy like Britain so that they could have better ruling; however some protestors wanted a complete change and a new system of ruling. But the Tsar was poised to hold onto his autocratic power. On the other hand Source F by the Tsarina portrays a very different, understanding of the situation. She calls all these violent, angry, and uncontrollable riots a simple 'hooligan movement' this being for a variety of different reasons. Two of the main reason being firstly the Tsar, to reassure him that everything is calm and that there is no serious danger and secondly, unlike Trotsky she did not understand or know the true feelings of the people. Further to this in addition, she wanted to create (or the Tsar to believe) that the real culprits for all these strikes & protests are the Duma. There is a suggestion of proof where she states "But this will all pass and become calm if only the Duma will behave" It was clear from my own knowledge that the situation in Petrograd was out of hand. ...read more.


However it shows a strong support of the Tsar listening to the Tsarina. Another source which shows he does not listen to his advisors is Source A. The member of the Okhrana describes the workers on being "on the verge of despair" and that there are uncontrollable riots. The member makes very serious points but does the tsar listen no! Instead he listens to The Tsarina who is the worst person possible to give advice. Sources C, D and E all show support of growing unrest. My personal opinion is that Source D shows the best growing unrest fact as it is a table showing the rapid increase of protestors over a week which shows the seriousness of the situation we can then tell that Source F is biased as the tsarina says its "simply young people running and shouting about" Now I think that 350,000 isn't just a couple of young people. Source E does show a good understanding of the situation but it is exaggerated massively. So after analysing all the sources and using my own knowledge I can conclude to the fact that Tsarism did collapse because the Tsar was weak, and who did not listen to his advisors. But not listening to his advisors is not the only weakness he had as they're many others, stated previously in the essay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    I think another reason for source B being more reliable is because a lot of confusion surrounding the first two days would have been over, which is why Tsaritsa Alexandra's is so inaccurate because everyone was probably unsure what was happening.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Many of the middle and working class were exasperated by then. Nicholas once again turned down his only form of help to control war effort from the Duma and by doing so, turned it against him. "...the establishing of a responsible ministry," wrote the Grand Duke George, "...is considered to

  1. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    The Right completely dominating politics, with terror as its right hand ensuring victory. "The iron fist was rarely concealed by a velvet glove: coercion was a vital part of the state's armoury" (Waldron).

  2. Why Did The 'February Revolution' Of 1917 Happen?

    Factories were also closed down. 23 february was International Women's day and thousands of women and later men came together with banners such as 'Down with the German woman'. The people were getting aggressive and very annoyed about the circumstance with the shortage of food.

  1. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    because 80% of Russia's population at the time were peasants, and in 1881 only 928,000 people were living in St Petersburg. By 1914 the population of St Petersburg had increased to 2,217,000 this caused a lot of problems. It caused social unrest, their were on trade union or legal representation and bad living conditions because the city was so crowded.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    As many of these men had pledged their lives to Russia, the putting on "show trials' only humiliated them further. They had pledged their lives to Communism and Stalin but in return they were killed instead of being praised. The reason those put on "show trial" were mindful of pleading

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The head of the army, Lin Biao, died in a failed coup attempt against Mao, and Deng Xiaoping regained a high position within the government. Like the Great Leap Forward, the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution was another costly waste for the nation.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Yet the overthrow of capitalism did not follow this pattern. Rather than the working class coming to power in the advanced industrial countries, the capitalist system was to break, in Lenin's words, "at its weakest link".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work