• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The five-year plans: an economic miracle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The five-year plans: an economic miracle? Questions 1. Source A in my opinion portrays Stalin from the very start as being an aggressive and uncompromising person, 'Wipe out the Kulaks' shows us how extreme his policies were against people who he saw as a hindrance to his Communist Russia. The source itself should be very reliable because it seems to have been taken as a direct quote from Stalin himself in December 1929. Stalin seems to be very sure that the Kulaks were '...sworn enemies of the collective farm (kolkhoz)...' however there is no argument as to why they were against the farming methods, in my view they probably were because Stalin's plan was to only get the peasants involved in collectivisation and to take all of the Kulak's wealth to aid his plans. Source B briefly says that the five-year plan had 'over-fulfilled' all expectations and as a consequence, some of the Russian population were becoming '...intoxicated by such successes...'. This source also tells us that 'Collective farms must not be established by force', in my opinion I think is at least a slight fabrication of what actually happened regarding how the farms were established. ...read more.

Middle

In contrast Source D tells of the exceedingly poor financial difficulties in Russia. It tells us that all the people were '...starving in its absolute sense...' compared to the soldiers who '...were well fed...'. Surely this seems to be a bit hypocritical as communism was meant to make everyone equal. This source could also be biased because the English were always against Stalin's communist policies. However there does to seems to be a certain element of truth in the source because the journalist actually speaks to a peasant about the situation '...'they have taken everything away'...' seems to be genuine... Overall I would say that source D is more reliable than source C because it is hard to imagine the Red Army soldiers working alongside normal peasants (as shown in source C) because in my opinion in do not believe that this would have actually happened. 3. In my opinion Source F supports Source E very well. This is because Source F is purely a description of how the Russian workforce was working at a higher level of production than some of the non-communist countries such as American and Czechoslovakia. ...read more.

Conclusion

4. Source F was written by a member of the state-planning agency so it seems to me that he would have been biased towards the five-year plans. I believe that a modern historian must seriously consider the validity of this source because Stalin and others members of his communist party had a reputation of manipulating information to make Stalin's policies look very effective. The source publicises the fact that Russian workers had a higher production rate than their democratic counterparts... A member of Stalin's secret police force wrote source G so we must assume that this source would probably have been reported to either Stalin or one of his senior officers so it probably has a high percentage chance of being accurate. During Stalin's time in power he was notorious for making sure that anyone who said anything bad about himself or communism in general was punished severely by either 'disposing' of them or sending to work in one of the labour camps. This definitely ties in with the link to the secret police, so one can more or less take it for granted that source is very reliable. The source also could be said reinforces the point about... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    He believed in 'Socialism in one country' -the USSR would become strong enough to survive, then would take over the rest of the world. To get votes before he became elected Stalin used propaganda to portray an image of himself into the minds of the public.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Source K is the last source that supports Stalin. This was part of a biography of Stalin and it was written in 1947. Stalin was still alive at this point, and people wouldn't dare to write anything bad about Stalin, being aware of what happens at show trials.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    Also, socialism could only be created in a highly industrialised state where the overwhelming majority of the population were workers. However, just before Stalin took over there was only about twenty per cent of the whole USSR population working. Stalin needed to demonstrate to the Bolsheviks as well himself that

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Furthermore, political factors were also significant in the initiation of the Five Year Plans which Stalin brought about. Undoubtedly, the Russian Communists were living in a non-industrial society where it was believed that the survival of ideas such as Communism and Socialism were in peer danger and hence the industrialisation

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    there were many other reasons for Russia to industrialise at that time, but it would have been at least a small part of the five-year plans to make Stalin look very much like the man who, by himself, proved communism and made Russia strong.

  2. five year plans in russia

    The Russian heavy industries were far below average, and Stalin felt that developing these industries were important. The factories would be able to churn out machinery for farming, which would increase productivity and allow more workers to join the working force.

  1. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    This was one of the things that Stalin did that was truly communist, was allowing for free education and free medical care. He believe that the workforce should be healthy, able to read, and know a little bit about their trade.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    An agrarian reform movement was launched to redistribute land, eliminate landlords, and bring all agriculture under state control. The state set prices, determined how much would be produced, and distributed grain ration tickets to all. Land was collectivized and peasants were organized into Production Teams, which together formed larger units called Production Brigades.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work