• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The following are equally important reasons why Stalin was able to hold onto power in the Soviet Union:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The following are equally important reasons why Stalin was able to hold onto power in the Soviet Union: The purges and show trials The secret police Propaganda and the cult of personality Stalin's economic policies. Explain how far you agree with this statement. Stalin used to methods to hold onto power in the Soviet Union these were fear / coercion and persuasion / consent. If people were not persuaded by Stalin's personality and economic policies they would be scared into supporting him. From the outset Stalin was particularly aware of his image and the importance and power of propaganda. He came to power partly as a result of his creation of a cult of 'Leninism' and by persuading the people that he was ' the best, the staunchest, the comrade in arms, of Lenin'. That awareness of the importance and power and propaganda continued throughout the thirty plus years that he led the Soviet Union. The impression he made on the party, the Soviet people and the rest of the world all affected the way in which he could govern. He carefully nurtured his image allowing him to be portrayed at all times as he wanted to be seen. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky is also a good example of Stalin's use of terror when propaganda alone would not succeed since ultimately unable to silence Trotsky in another way Stalin had him assassinated. In the same way Stalin could not bear any challenges to his authority and intended to keep his powerful position through terror as well as propaganda. Purges and show trials were a major technique Stalin used to scare Russian citizens into supporting him. He began purging the Communist party of people who had opposed him previously or may pose a threat in the future. On March 1936 the first show trial was announced as I have mentioned above and all 18 of the defendants were sentenced to death and executed. These trials continued with both apparently loyal party leaders and over 25,000 officers of the Red Army being removed and either executed of exiled to the Gulags. The organ of the state used to round up Stalin's enemies was the secret police (NKVD). However members of the NKVD who were not efficient enough or who were deemed to posed a threat to Stalin were also killed of deported. In all cases the families of the accused were considered just as guilty of crimes committed against the state and were also deported. ...read more.

Conclusion

By the end of the 1930's the USSR was second only to the USA in industrial production. Huge new hydroelectric power stations were in operation; massive new steel plants had been built and now produced good quality steel for use in other industries. Communications by road, rail and water had been transformed. This was a massive achievement given the state of the country in the 1920's. Despite the sacrifices they had made most industrial workers were justly proud of their country. As I have shown Stalin's economic policies, his use of propaganda and the cult of personality supported by the ruthless application of terror through the secret police and purges and show trials all worked together to keep Stalin in power. It is difficult to single out any one of these as more important then another as in my opinion they are inter related. Ultimately Stalin had to implement his economic policies which were crucial to his ' Socialism in one country' philosophy. However those policies provoked opposition and required an unprecedented degree of ruthlessness to implement. Some of the opposition could be allayed by propaganda but in order to be completely sure of his position Stalin also needed the use of secret police and purges and show trials. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Breakfast was bread and a mug of very hot water to wash in and drink' from Maria Joffe, a journalist who was imprisoned between 1929 and 1957. This is a description of solitary confinement. The victims of Stalin's terror included the majority of the most gifted and able Soviet Unions.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    The excessive weakness of all political institutions meant that they developed little no integrity, autonomy or coherence. They could not act independently or structure their own internal operations and were always subject to intervention and control by the leader. Daniels argues that Stalin's refusal to tolerate criticism or disapproval resulted in 'intellectual stagnation, dogmatism and bureaucratic formalism'11.

  1. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Being produced after the break-up the historian may have had better access to sources. Nove doesn't appear to be directly involved in the situation showing no suggestion of ulterior motives. "Furthermore the three cracking plants which now exist are to be turned into 120 by the end of the of the five year plan.

  2. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    the Tsar and knew that if troops were left on the front popularity would drop. Stalin's idea was to replace these people with newly trained men who had a great support for the Soviet Union and would keep on fighting for the Russia even if morale was low and would always support Stalin.

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    than with actual threats to his control or the leadership of the USSR. This source, I think is not bias because it was written after the end of the USSR and as such, the author is unlikely to have been bias to give a certain opinion.

  2. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    The source placed to the left shows how the NEP differed to war communism. As you can see during "war communism" there were no benefits for those peasants willing to work harder, However, under the NEP a hard working peasant sees the benefits pay off.

  1. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    This would be funded using the monies collected from the export of surplus grain. Initially, participation in the collectivised farms that supplied this grain was voluntary. By 1928 it was clear that this mild approach was not working - there was insufficient grain reaching the evolving industrial towns, partly due to the low price commanded by the government.

  2. Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of ...

    In that case, no matter how cunning Stalin was, the trick wouldn?t have worked. As aforementioned, Trotsky?s character, weaknesses and mistakes made him trip over himself and gave Stalin the chance to marginalize him despite the fact that he was a marvelous speaker and he had many major contributions to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work