• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The following were all equally important reasons why Stalin was able to hold onto power in the Soviet Union:.The purges and show trials,.The secret police,

Extracts from this document...


Sam Pedwell History Russia coursework question C The following were all equally important reasons why Stalin was able to hold onto power in the Soviet Union: .The purges and show trials, .The secret police, .Propaganda and the cult of personality, .Stalin's economic policies. Gaining power over the USSR was only part of the challenge that faced Stalin, once in power he then had to hold onto power something which he achieved through a combination of strategies and methods. Stalin knew what his goals were and achieved them in such a way that the Russian people supported him, he made sure that all his achievements were known and that his failures stayed away from the public eye winning the hearts and the minds of Russian citizens. To explain the importance that each of the above reasons had I am going to relate and compare them to each other as often the reasons effect could not be seen in action until combined with another resulting reason. ...read more.


The show trials were also liked to the secret police as they were widely publicised and created yet more fear of the secret police amongst Russian people. The effect of the secret police was a crucial one if Stalin were to succeed in his reign; this relatively small workforce's capabilities were blown out of all proportions and ensured that what Stalin said, went. The secret police's effects were really seen more through the purges and show trials but there can be no doubt that without them more opposition to Stalin would have surfaced and support dwindle. The show trials and purges and also the secret police are linked to Stalin's propaganda and the cult of personality. As time went by Stalin became more and more paranoid and fearful of his role and became more and more controlling of the Soviet Union. Stalin's propaganda and the cult of personality came in many different forms and appeared in many different places, his picture was seen everywhere, in newspapers on billboards in cinemas along with claims of his greatness and tales of his wonderful achievements and friendships with Lenin and other popular figures. ...read more.


This policy helped Stalin hold onto power because he was actively seen by the people to be improving their country and essentially their lives as he provided both employment and facilities/materials, it also helped him maintain control as countries were less likely to invade Russia if it had a strong army. Many of Stalin's other economic policies would have certainly gained him a lot of support as he ensured that his policies were always such that they would be well received at the time by the Russian citizens. However I do feel that whilst each of these reasons had great significance none of them would have had such effect unless combined with the other reasons each reason led onto another reason. His ability to manipulate situations that had come about through luck, he changed his policies to fit in with the idea's of the time and used his opponents weakness's against them to succeed in holding power. Stalin did so many bad things in his time but was able to cover for them and hold onto power for so long because of all of the above reasons. Sam Pedwell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    The people who were sick were given less food; this made their chance of recovering very low so therefore many of them died. An account of what life was like in the labour camp is as follows: 'It was one metre in width and less than two in length.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    Regional leaders retained substantial autonomy in local affairs and the high level of centralisation at elite levels coexisted with significant looseness lower down the political structure. It is also certain that the terror resulted in the elimination of numerous valuable members of society and who would have continued to play an important role in helping the Soviet Union move forward.

  1. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    If left under the old Tsar's troops if morale dropped they could undermine Stalin and kick him out of power. Another tactic that Stalin employed was getting rid of the "Kulaks" or richer peasants. Stalin did this so that collectivisation would work. He needed to make all the peasants equal.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    The government didn't really care about the health of the people; instead, they just made them work all the time. One department where Stalin failed was customer industry. The customer industry didn't match the standards of heavy industry. Under the first Five Year Plan textile production declined, the main reason

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    Whereas, | think that Lenin was more concerned about ensuring absolute internal stability and allowing communism to spread naturally. This I think is a reason that Stalin was more important than Lenin in the creation of the USSR. Economic impact The NEP, implemented because of the famine cause by the

  2. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    He states Russia is currently "Poor, starving old Russia" with "the meal of a crust of black bread" however he states the NEP "will transform the Russian economy and rebuild a broken nation. The future is endless and beautiful" However when looking at this source there could be a biased

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Other agreements of two sources include the idea of Stalin being the judge however the extent of this differs in the source J where Stalin is not only the judge but everything including their lawyers. Source J doesn't portray any defendants nor does it portray the destiny of the defendants

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    Trotsky for example was close to Stalin when Lenin was alive, but as soon as he died and Stalin received some authority he had Trotsky exiled and then murdered. We are also not told of the labour camps as well as the starvation of millions due to collectivisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work