• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front were broken: Development of new technology, the American entry into the war, the blockading of German ports and the German offensive of 1918. Explain how far you agree wit

Extracts from this document...


The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front were broken: Development of new technology, the American entry into the war, the blockading of German ports and the German offensive of 1918. Explain how far you agree with this statement. There are several factors that contribute to the breaking of the stalemate on the Western Front, a deadlock of attrition which had been in place since the winter of 1914. However, some of them are more important than others and some make a more significant contribution to this event, but a lot of the factors interrelate and are influenced by the other factors, which makes all of the factors important. Ever since the beginning of the war, developments in technology for the purposes of gaining the upper hand in the war had been developing. However, at the start of the war, this was not apparent to the Allies, who still believed a well-planned cavalry charge could break through any defence the enemy might have prepared. However, the Germans were more open-minded, and soon realised that state-of-the-art technology was going to have to be invented, manufactured and supplied to the German army to win the war. ...read more.


The British and the French insisted that the Americans had to shoulder a greater burden of the war, but Pershing thought differently. Horrified by Allied leadership, he did not want to entrust his soldiers to the Allied generals, and wanted American autonomy; he insisted that the American forces act independently, which greatly irritated the Allied generals. However, by the end of the war, there had been over 300'000 American casualties. Since the beginning of the war, Britain had set up a naval blockade to prevent Germany from shipping in its vital supplies, which was part of the strategy of attrition. The only access to the sea that Germany has for shipping purposes was the North Sea, and Britain was eager to make sure Germany could not import the vital supplies that she needed not only for the military needs of the country, but also for the everyday supplies which were being drained by the war effort, e.g. food. A minefield was placed all along the North Sea between Britain and Norway, to prevent Germany from sending any ships through it. 75 U-boats were sunk due to the placement of mines. ...read more.


The blockade led to the Germans beginning a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic Ocean, which then led to the sinking of the Lusitania, which was a major contributing factor to the American entry into the war. However, the main reason that the stalemate broke was due to the Spring Offensive of 1918; the other factors were the reasons this offensive took place. The American entry into the war created pressure on the German generals, as did the shipping blockade, but the improvements in technology made the idea of a grand offensive seem better. It is also important to remember that another major factor contributing to the Spring Offensive, and therefore the breaking of a stalemate, was the Russian Revolution of 1917, which led to the Russian surrender and the freeing-up of 62 divisions. Without these divisions, Germany would never have had the experienced manpower to operate all the new technology it had developed and so the Spring Offensive could never have happened. In conclusion, the actual main (and therefore the most important) factor contributing to the breaking of stalemate on the western front was the German offensive of 1918; however, this could not have happened without the other factors taking place as well, which makes them all very important factors also. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. why did a stalemate devlop on the western front?

    Failure of the Schlieffen Plan The first plan put into use was the German Schlieffen plan and in this part of the essay I am going to discuss the many reasons why this plan was not successful and how it led to the development of the stalemate.

  2. World War 1 - Breaking of the Stalemate

    To begin with, I will look at machine guns. Machine Guns were designed to fire multiple bullets quickly, without the need for reloading. At the start of the war, machine guns took 4-6 men to operate, and fired 400-600 rounds a minute.

  1. Why did a stalemate form on the Western Front?

    As the Schlieffen plan had failed France were not clear on what was going on. To try and and attack from stable positions by getting round the back of each other both sides (Germany against Britain and France) had a "race".

  2. "Castlereagh's foreign policy 1815-1822 was more successful than Canning's foreign policy 1822-1827" - Explain ...

    to come in as a cockboat in the wake of the British man-of-war." Adams won over the cabinet and resident Monroe delivered what is now known as the Monroe Doctrine which declared four basic points. The United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    At this point he pressed Austria for immediate mobilisation against Russia, promising unqualified German support in a European war. In this manner, because of strategic considerations, Germany pushed forward to make the war inevitable. 8. It is clear that the outbreak of a general war was neither inevitable nor considered to be so as a result of the Sarajevo assassination.

  2. WW1-planning for war, major battles. War at sea and in the air.

    The Germans losses were said to be 500,000. The Germans had a smaller army and therefore their losses were more and Haig claimed an attritional victory. The British only advanced 6 miles and with them and the allies put together on 15 miles at most was gained.

  1. The most important aim of wartime propaganda was to encourage hatred of the enemy. ...

    Therefore, minority groups could still put their points across. However, it could also be unreliable as it is bias; the reason for this is because it only represents a small percentage of the Socialists view in Britain. The purpose of this source is to promote socialism (in and out of

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    Factories back home in each country were soon geared up to produce all the extra munitions needed. However the naval blockade hindered Germany?s production as it cut off supplies of nitrates, which is vital for explosives. Germany could not produce food or weaponry necessary for the troops.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work