• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The German reactions to Nazi anti-Jewish policies - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


history Coursework Q2. Source B is a report by a Social Democrat from 1935. It tells us hat the German people had many different reactions to the Nazi anti-Jewish policy. Some people "don't take it very seriously" because the country has other matters to worry about; the vast majority of people are influenced and support the policy but the majority ignore or even oppose what's going on. They don't agree but don't say anything to stop it, they are apathetic. In the other sources we can also find examples of apathy. Source c tells us that generally the crowds were "silent"; showing they neither supported or opposed what was going on. It also says that they seemed "gravely disturbed". It shows that they saw what was going on but ignored it and didn't want to get involved. In source D it tells us that the people were apathetic to begin with. He is almost saying that they were ignorant to the fact that this "minor harassment" was anything serious until 'Kristallnacht'. ...read more.


We can see this when we see an SA member guarding the entrance to a Jewish shop, turning away anyone who tried to enter. This shows us that even though it was a Jewish shop, customers still wanted to go in. Whilst we have some evidence to support the interpretation in, they all have flaws and limitations. Source C was written by an American reporting from one particular place. It is on one anti-Jewish and one event. It says that 'a wave of destruction' came over Germany. He couldn't have known this as he was not all over Germany at one time; he was just in one place and for all we know this was a one off situation. We cannot assume that this happens all over Germany. Source F only implies that all the Germans went along with the policy. It is place - Oldenburg and again we cannot assume this is the same across Germany. It doesn't tell us how the German public reacted after 'Kristallnacht'. ...read more.


It was written by a Social Democratic party Leader who at the time was exiled and so he was not even in the country. He has no evidence to support his claims and is also biased, as he was the Nazi opposition at the time. It was written in 1935, which was before Kristallnacht. The fact that Source B has so many flaws, that it undermines the whole question of assessing how the Germans reacted to the Nazi policies. We need to compare the source to one that itself has no limitations. Each of the sources has limitations or flaws but this is the case with every source you will get. Ultimately, we haven't enough evidence to support Source B. If we wanted to fully understand how the Germans reacted to Nazi anti-Jewish policies, we would need a great deal more evidence and much more research on the reactions of each of the policies from every German at the time all around the country. We will never fully know how the public reacted to these policies and we can only go by the information given to us by sources such as Source B, and we have to accept that there will always be limitations and flaws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Source A suggests that statement i)

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    "After Kristallnacht no German could any longer be under any illusion," as to the fate of the Jews. This declares that the Germans knew what would happen to the Jews. Thus it can be stated that the Germans did not act upon their information to prevent the mass killing of the Jews and therefore they were not 'unwilling executioners.'

  1. How much did the German People know about the final solution?

    Information about such things as mass shootings was also talked about in casual army conversation. This then was backed up by the fact that the Radio which many Germans owned at this period was being used by the allies who broadcasted programs about the fate of the Jews to the German population.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    To support quote ii furthermore, Georgi Dimitrov, a Bulgarian communist leader, proved to Goering that the Reichstag officials did not collect any membership card of the communist party that belonged to Lubbe when Goering claimed that he had Lubbe's passport and communist identity card when he spoke on the 28th of February.

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    It depicts Tsar Nicholas II 'who had encouraged attacks against Jews during his reign (1894-1917), who is looking down from what I assume is heaven. Communists murdered him and his family in 1918. Nicholas is saying to the Nazi who stands below him, 'Attacking the Jews did not do me any good, my Fascist friend'.

  2. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    In his other hand, he is holding a baseball bat with nails sticking out. This implies that the Nazis don't only stab the Jews, but use extreme violence in torturing them. The Nazi has watches hanging from him and this symbolises that the Nazi's has taken this from the Jews after killing them.

  1. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    The records of the Einsatzgruppen unit which participated in the executions recorded that 33,771 Jews were killed at Babi Yar on September 29-30. In all, more than 100,000 people, most of them Jews, were executed at Babi Yar between 1941-1943 by the Nazis.

  2. Chamberlain's policy towards Germany - source related questions and answers

    Henderson also explains, "I cannot believe that this is not apparent to Hitler", which would make Chamberlain believe that Hitler would never risk a war, if it did damage to his country and Chamberlain knew that Hitler was not such an ignorant man.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work