• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The German reactions to Nazi anti-Jewish policies - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


history Coursework Q2. Source B is a report by a Social Democrat from 1935. It tells us hat the German people had many different reactions to the Nazi anti-Jewish policy. Some people "don't take it very seriously" because the country has other matters to worry about; the vast majority of people are influenced and support the policy but the majority ignore or even oppose what's going on. They don't agree but don't say anything to stop it, they are apathetic. In the other sources we can also find examples of apathy. Source c tells us that generally the crowds were "silent"; showing they neither supported or opposed what was going on. It also says that they seemed "gravely disturbed". It shows that they saw what was going on but ignored it and didn't want to get involved. In source D it tells us that the people were apathetic to begin with. He is almost saying that they were ignorant to the fact that this "minor harassment" was anything serious until 'Kristallnacht'. ...read more.


We can see this when we see an SA member guarding the entrance to a Jewish shop, turning away anyone who tried to enter. This shows us that even though it was a Jewish shop, customers still wanted to go in. Whilst we have some evidence to support the interpretation in, they all have flaws and limitations. Source C was written by an American reporting from one particular place. It is on one anti-Jewish and one event. It says that 'a wave of destruction' came over Germany. He couldn't have known this as he was not all over Germany at one time; he was just in one place and for all we know this was a one off situation. We cannot assume that this happens all over Germany. Source F only implies that all the Germans went along with the policy. It is place - Oldenburg and again we cannot assume this is the same across Germany. It doesn't tell us how the German public reacted after 'Kristallnacht'. ...read more.


It was written by a Social Democratic party Leader who at the time was exiled and so he was not even in the country. He has no evidence to support his claims and is also biased, as he was the Nazi opposition at the time. It was written in 1935, which was before Kristallnacht. The fact that Source B has so many flaws, that it undermines the whole question of assessing how the Germans reacted to the Nazi policies. We need to compare the source to one that itself has no limitations. Each of the sources has limitations or flaws but this is the case with every source you will get. Ultimately, we haven't enough evidence to support Source B. If we wanted to fully understand how the Germans reacted to Nazi anti-Jewish policies, we would need a great deal more evidence and much more research on the reactions of each of the policies from every German at the time all around the country. We will never fully know how the public reacted to these policies and we can only go by the information given to us by sources such as Source B, and we have to accept that there will always be limitations and flaws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    The cartoon was published on the day the rioting began, and the message of it is clear, Nicholas is advising the Nazis not to kill the Jews, as it did not do him any good- he was murdered for it.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    If the fire had been planned by the Nazis, you would have presumed that would have also planned out what to do after the fire too, unless the Nazis planned to make it look like it was unexpected. The extract goes on to say that 'The arrests of the Communists

  1. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    it is implying that the fire brigade have been deliberately told not to put the fires out, so this suggests that it was not spontaneous at all and instead it was organised by the Nazis and implicated by the SS.

  2. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    We know that this man is a Nazi as he is in uniform. The Nazi is holding a knife in his hand symbolises that the Nazi's clearly use violence to get what they want. The knife is dripping with blood and this encourages the reader to assume that he has just killed a Jew.

  1. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Their orders were to execute on the spot all Communists, Jews, and Gypsies. It is estimated that by the end of 1942, they had killed more than a million Soviet Jews. These victims were shot or loaded into enclosed trucks modified for the introduction of carbon monoxide to asphyxiate its victims.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    They are shown to be dirty and this makes the Jews appear to be second class citizens. 5b) During the 1930s and 1940s Jews were presented like this because Germany was under Nazi rule. One of the founding principles of the Nazi Party was racism, namely anti-Semitism as stated in the 25 Point Programme,1920.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    The things that were said in the cartoon were actually Hitler's thoughts not Hindenburg's. Hindenburg didn't advised Hitler to use the situation to become dictator. Actually, Hindenburg did not even want Hitler to be chancellor. Source D is a book that also shows the Reichstag Fire in the background.

  2. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    he may of notice, as well as the fact he was a Jew may make a reader feel he was exaggerating on the events. Source E backs up David Buffman's account on Kristallnacht saying the SA/SS men were involved in the attacks and the letter was written just after the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work