History – question
The idealist of the 10th point - the collective security concept
There’s writing in the 10th Article of the League of Nations: “The members of the league undertake to preserve against external aggression the territory and existing independence of all members of the League. In case of threat of danger the Council of the League shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.” I really like this point! But I can’t refuse that it’s a very idealistic idea.
To set up the League of Nation, the more countries join, the better. But if there are not a lot of countries that join the League, then the League won’t work (as what happened in the history). Many countries didn’t want to join the League, because there weren’t many profits to get! Every country who joins the League has to be disarm and if the country doesn’t listen the League or when the country leaves the League, the countries in League of Nation will stop to trade with that country and will send armies to deal with that country, so if there’s not many benefits, then why shall the countries join the League of Nation? The 10th point’s main aim is to make our world stable and to have more peace, but if not many of the countries will join the League or we can say when the League’s power is very poor, then the world will stay as same as before and the League will seems as it doesn’t exists! (Because it’s for nothing and nobody can depends on it.)