The interior of the Apprentice House today bears very little resemblance to what it was like in the early 19th century. Does this mean that it is of no value as evidence of how Styal Apprentices lived in the early 19th century?

Authors Avatar

Adam Pearson-Davies

The interior of the Apprentice House today bears very little resemblance to what it was like in the early 19th century. Does this mean that it is of no value as evidence of how Styal Apprentices lived in the early 19th century?

  Since it was last used to house the Apprentices in the mid 19th century, the Apprentice House at Styal has served many purposes. It has served as a television repair shop, a store room and private residence, to name just a few. It has also been derelict. When the National Trust obtained the property in the 1970’s it was basically just an empty shell. Even today, half of the House remains the private residence of National trust workers. All of this limits its usefulness and reliability to Historians. As a result, of its many uses, much of the original evidence has been lost.

 However, regardless of this, the National Trust has an underlying interest, in presenting the Apprentice House as it would have been, when it was in its original use. They have a vested interest in recreating it as accurately as possible, otherwise no customers would visit, and the National trust would lose money.

  To do this the National trust, has accumulated and used as much evidence as possible. A good example of such evidence is the transcript of the Hearing of Thomas Priestley. In this Priestley, describes much of his accommodation, ‘the rooms were whitewashed’.  

  The School room shown during the National Trust Tour, ‘is probably not the actual School room, actually,’ this we know from the National Trust Guide, who quoted the aforementioned. However, we know from the transcript of Joseph Sefton’s Hearing, that there was a School room ‘we had school every night but we used to attend about once a week’. In the School room, the walls were whitewashed – the evidence for this came from the Hearing of the aforementioned Priestley, ‘the rooms were whitewashed’. Furthermore, all of the props were of the period, either bought from Antique shops, other stately homes or reproduced accurately. The benches, slate tablets, quills, desks and boards were all arranged, as they probably would have been. Although, the school room was probably not the Apprentice’s School room, it probably was a typical Apprentice’s School room.

Join now!

  The Girl’s dormitory was arguably – according to the Guide – the most probable Girls Dormitory. The Guide said that ‘there were probably up to 60 Girls’ sleeping in the Dormitory. However, there were only 15 beds; although according to the Guide, one row was removed for safety reasons. The Guide also said that the Greg’s, may have flouted the law, having two, maybe three, sometimes to a bed.

  The beds shown in the room were not the actual beds, but rather 1980’s replicas. According to the Guide, however the beds were accurate replicas, based upon markings ...

This is a preview of the whole essay