• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

"The July Plot Failed Largely Because of Popular Support for Hitler." How valid is this as an assessment of the failure of the July Plot in 1944?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The July Plot Failed Largely Because of Popular Support for Hitler." How valid is this as an assessment of the failure of the July Plot in 1944? The German public had met the outbreak of World War II with a general sense of apprehension. Although Hitler had been admired for his achievements thus far, it was becoming increasingly obvious to the German public that the regeneration of their economy would come at a price. Hitler made considerable achievements in political and economic fields. He also addressed military matters and to some extent social policy. The Enabling Bill was passed in March 1933, with opposition coming only from the Socialists. This was due to the threat posed by the development of the Gestapo and of course, the SS, which had advanced "from improvised terror of the early years to the gigantic concentration-camp system of the extermination era." (Bracher - 1970) As a result of relentless persecution and the introduction of stringent laws, various groups emerged, with a mutual opposition to Nazi conformity. Unfortunately there was no single, unified resistance movement, which meant that any kind of successful campaign proved difficult to initiate, especially under the close eye of the Gestapo. Resistance ranged from youth groups such as the Edelweiss Pirates, committing petty crimes, to the Beck-Goerdeler group and the Kreisau Circle who made attempts on Hitler's life. At the same time there was a great deal of support for Hitler and allegiance to him, which made it more difficult still for the resistance groups to take any action. The Edelweiss Pirates were a prime example of youth resistance to Nazi conformity. They consisted of mostly working class youths. Some had refused to join the Hitler youth because of the lifestyle it would have imposed upon them. Others had simply dropped out from the Hitler Youth presumably because they disagreed with the programme. They daubed graffiti on public walls, disturbed uniformed officials and held pitched battles with the Hitler Youth. ...read more.

Middle

It must be said that, aside from popular support for Hitler, the July Plot and indeed many other attempts on Hitler's life suffered from severe misfortune. An unlikely series of flukes ensured that Hitler remained unscathed by any of the attempts until the final July Plot. "General Franz Halder and Henning von Tresckow intended to use a bomb to assassinate Hitler but the device failed to detonate... Field Marshal von Witzhelben intended to shoot Hitler at the Champs Elysees. Sadly Hitler declined his invitation to visit Paris... Colonel von Gersdorff agreed to blow up both himself and Hitler when they shook hands but he failed to get close enough" The above extract and the oath of allegiance are taken from "David Evans and Jane Jenkins Years of Weimar and the Third Reich, 1999." The oath is useful to an historian as a primary source. It demonstrates why it might have proven difficult to incite resistance against Hitler and thus gain support for the July Plot. As a direct translation it should not suffer from any form of bias. The above extract, in summarising the various attempts on Hitler's life, is useful in its portrayal of the desperate measures taken by resistance groups. David Evans and Jane Jenkins are specialised historians in this subject area and will have used both primary sources, secondary sources and other historians' views as well as their own knowledge. The date of publication of the sources would ensure that they were free from censorship. Additionally, any bias that might have been brought about during the post-war area will have been discounted by this time. By the end of 1943, The Gestapo and Himmler's SD had succeeded in dispersing most anti-Nazi resistance within Germany. Key figures of resistance had been arrested or invalidated in some way. Hans Oster, one of the heads of German military intelligence, who had maintained active resistance against Hitler, was placed under close surveillance. ...read more.

Conclusion

This particular book was published in 1982. Williamson would therefore have had a great deal of material at his disposal. He will have used a range of primary and secondary sources as well as taking into consideration views of other historians. Some of his other titles include 'Bismarck and Germany 1862-1890,' published in 1986, 'Germany from Defeat to Partition, 1945-1963,' and 'The Age of the Dictators,' not yet published. The views of Heinz Guderian and David G. Williamson differ greatly. We might again attribute this to their difference in nationality, though there are once more additional factors to be considered. Guderian's view might have been tainted greatly by a very influential Hitler whereas Williamson's view should have been free from any form of bias. The dates of publication also differ greatly. Guderian's book, 'Panzer Leader' was published in 1953, probably written almost immediately after the war when the general consensus was certainly a biased one. Williamson's 'The Third Reich' was published in 1982 when there was more material available, less propaganda and less influenced public opinion. I feel that support for Hitler was widespread, and where there wasn't support there was loyalty through fear. I believe that Himmler posed as much of a threat as Hitler as a Nazi aggressor and as head of the army from 1944, he could have overthrown any kind of provisional government set up by the Beck-Goerdeler Group upon assassination of Hitler. It would be wrong to say that the plot failed entirely due to popular support for Hitler and more feasible to propose that, as the essay title suggests, the plot failed largely due to popular support for Hitler. He gained the support of the army and had the support of the SA and later the SS. He also had a largely dedicated governmental cabinet. Any form of opposition was promptly eliminated. Of course, the July Plot also failed because of a succession of mishaps and poor organisation as previously mentioned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Why was Hitler so Popular in 1933?

    3 star(s)

    There was also another form of terror- Hitler killed his political rivals with his private army before taking power, after taking power he also used his private army to kill people who opposed him. This was done under extreme precaution without anyone knowing it ever happened Evidence supporting my point

  2. Unit 1 Play: The Resistible rise of Arturo Ui -Plot Prologue: ...

    Ragg is threatened and quickly leaves. Roma explains that the reason the press treat Ui "like dirt" is because of his "long silence." Ui dismisses this comment and turns his attention to waiting for Giri and Bowl, Sheet's long-time serving accountant until a week prior to this meeting, when Dogsborough fired him, having taken over the shipyard.

  1. To what extent was Hitler a totalitarian dictator?

    As they were part of a community. This cemented the regime because if the people were in a tight community the people would feel compelled to tell on those not conforming to the Nazi ideology. As they were so close they would find out quicker.

  2. Was the Weimar Republicdoomed to failure from the start?

    The army was very conservative and never really supported Weimar as they wished to remain neutral and there was also opposition from institutions. The Freikorps were becoming an increasing threat to society and the survival of the Republic. They secretly hid weapons for fighting Communists and to take part in liberation wars against France and Poland.

  1. adolf hitler

    He had fond memories of his mother, carried her photograph wherever he went and, it is claimed, had it in his hand when he died in 1945. As the eldest child, Hitler now received his father's civil service pension. It was more money than many people received in wages and meant that Hitler did not have to find employment.

  2. ­­How much support was there for the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1939?

    However, the way the lack of support is described in source E, suggests that the Berliners are not cheering out of their own morals, and that they are "unable" to find a word of cheer, not don't want to. This does not mean that they had not been shown pamphlets

  1. How widespread and dangerous was Youth opposition in the Third Reich?

    the community of young people- all this is marvellous."4, for firstly it gave youngsters the opportunity to go into the countryside for hiking or singing at a campfire, which was attractive due to the comradeship and its apparent high ideals, as a Hitler Youth leader pointed out: "What I liked about the HJ was the comradeship....

  2. Thr opposition of the Church.

    By the middle of the decade, however, these faint attempts at organized political disaffection had come to an end. That was due in part to a ruthlessness of the Gestapo, but mostly it reflects in the growing acceptance of the Nazi Order.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work