• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The League of Nations in the 1920's - Success or Failure?

Extracts from this document...


The League of Nations in the 1920's Success or Failure? The League of Nations was formed for one main reason: to ensure that a war like world war one NEVER broke out again. It wanted to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security, as well as raise living conditions of men and women worldwide. It planned to do this by having a Covenant that all nations should follow, whether or not they were in the League. The Covenant was: To promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security: 1. By the acceptance of obligations not to resort to war. 2. By the prescription of open just and honourable relations between nations. 3. By the firm establishment of international law as the rule of conduct between governments. 4. By the maintenance of justice and a scrupulous respect for all treaty obligations in the dealings of organized peoples with one another. The nations that were in the League were most of the world, with the exception of the defeated nations of World War One (Germany, Austria, Hungary) ...read more.


This was a peaceful solution and the problem was resolved. Upper Silesia's situation was a success. It was a success because it was within the League's power to stop the possible conflict. The country's involved were not major parts, and Upper Silesia was a small country not capable of a major fight, but yet, it could still stir trouble. But the League was able to manipulate Upper Silesia and divide it without a problem, because there was no major force preventing them from doing it. Other successes of the League of the same fashion were the Aaland Islands of 1921 in which Finland and Sweden disputed over a small set of islands and the Greco/ Bulgarian Border Patrol incident. These were both resolved peacefully due to the involved nation's lack of power. The failures of the League however where on a much higher note. An example of this was the Division of the Ruhr in 1923, where Germany had gotten behind in it's war reparation's, and France and Belgium invaded the Ruhr to seize coal mines and get money from them which was not paid in the reparations. ...read more.


It appeared that the League could not deal with determined aggressors, which was later shown in Japanese and Italian aggressions, which could not be stopped by the League's actions. Not only that, there were some situations that did not defy the League's covenant yet still counted towards the failure of the League. They could NOT achieve disarmaments. Like the Washington Naval Agreement of 1922 in which the USA, Britain, France and Japan agreed to reduce their fleets, but the League played no part in. Another is that the League was not invited to talks between the great powers and Germany relating to the future of the Treaty of Versailles agreement. Another mistake of the League was to refuse the defeated nation's entry to the League at first. Maybe if this happened, it could have stopped German anger at the Treaty of Versailles and possibly stopped World War 2. And, last but not least, the League was effectively disbanded upon the breakout of World War Two. If it was successful, a war would not have broken out and it would never have disbanded. How can something with so many failures be successful? Well, it can't. And that is my view upon it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

    The leader of Italy Mussolini had been planning to take Abyssinia since the 1920's even while publicly signing a treaty of friendship with Haile Selassie (Emperor of Abyssinia) In December 1934 there was a disputed between the Italian and the Abyssinian soldiers at the Wal-Wal oasis, 50 miles inside Abyssinia.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This however did not happen. Germany were at peace with other countries but it was a dictat ( dictated peace ). This meant that the allies were still in control of the situation. This would crush German pride. This is as it gives the feel that they are under control by another country.

  1. The Success Of Blitzkrieg II.

    for the whole of their army and one those was not working. So after coming out of the Ardennes (which could not have been made easier)

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    An example of this is in 1923 when the 'Corfu incident' occurred. No investigation was made into this incident and Italy got what they wanted in the end. Britain and France did nothing because they wanted to keep friendly with Italy as it was in their best interests.

  1. Was the League of Nations a Success or Failure?

    For three years it stayed under the leagues control but in 1923 the Lithuanians invaded the port. The league intervened and gave to land surrounding Memel to Lithuania but made the port an "international zone". Lithuania approved of this decision.

  2. The failures of Gallipoli

    If they had kept going they would have surely taken that area over. This shows the poor command and bad organisation that took place in Gallipoli. In Gallipoli, the commanders were ignorant and arrogant towards the lower rank's needless dying.


    They managed to defeat the Persian navy and clear them from Caria. This double victory meant that Cimon had justified the existence of the Delian League and carried out its objective of freeing Greek cities and towns that had fallen victim to Persia.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Yet, at the time the Pact was seen as a turning point in history. Conclusion: By 1930, we can tell how successful the League was. It only did well when there involved smaller nations. When it had troubles with larger states, it had trouble because of France?s and Britain?s lack of commitment to sending in troops.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work