• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The legality in which Hitler came to power.

Extracts from this document...


The legality in which Hitler came to power Hitler's rise to power is an interesting issue that consists of many factors into how Hitler came to power and whether or not it was lawful or unlawful. We have to as historians appreciate that in reality both lawful and unlawful factors were crucial together, in the consolidation of power for Hitler. Examples in how Hitler climbed his way up the political ladder in an illegal sense would be incidents such as the Reichstag fire and the Night of the long knives. The Reichstag building was burned down on 27 February 1933. This helped Hitler to gain a majority in the upcoming March election. The Nazis blamed the fire on the communists, specifically Van der Lubbe - and they claimed that he intended to spark a communist uprising in Germany. ...read more.


The regular army was not happy with this arrangement, and Hitler was alarmed, as a merger would make R�hm the most powerful man in Germany. Hitler thought something had to be done to prevent this from ever happening and with the advice from Hermann G�ring and Heinrich Himmler, and so the SS and army murdered R�hm and approximately 400 other leaders of the SA. The purge of the SA was very much an illegal process in the Nazi consolidation of power but nevertheless Hitler had succeeded in wiping out the only real threat to his power and had also gained the support of the army. Shortly after the purge of the SA, Hitler formally explained to the Reichstag his reasons for doing so However, Hitler didn't consolidate his power through unlawful procedures all the way, he wanted to look good infront of the German public, in doing so he had passed out many lawful issues which didn't make his consolidation of power illegal. ...read more.


Similarly, Hitler used these powers to destroy all opposing political parties, creating a one party state. Also, the purge of the SA had ultimately resulted in Adolf Hitler's unchangeable power in Germany, but this act can be described as the main contributing argument to the legality of Hitler's consolidation of power. This purge is now seen as legal because a law was passed after the event that made Hitler's actions perfectly legal. This act therefore resulted in a closer alliance between the Nazi state and the army, giving Hitler greater power than ever before In conclusion, looking at all the aspects in which go into the argument of whether Hitler achieved supreme control over Germany through an unlawful or lawful manner, I would say that Hitler's consolidation of power was achieved mainly through lawful than unlawful means. Yet the unlawful means were either never reviled or were rationally accepted for the good of the country. Hamza Rahman History H/W Mr Lyon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. adolf hitler

    Over two million Jews lived in the Soviet Union and most of them lived in the areas under German occupation. It was while the SS were rounding up the Jews in the Soviet Union that Hitler decided on what became known as the Final Solution.

  2. There are many reasons why Hitler came to power in 1933.

    In September 1930 the Nazis increased their seats to 107. The communists got 54 seats. The largest of the parties that supported democracy lost 10 seats. Success in these elections made the Nazis ambitious. Over the next two years they made huge efforts to increase their support further, doubling their vote in 1932.

  1. How and why do Historians approaches to the MunichAgreement differ from each other?

    On the other hand, Hobsbawm claims that it was 'the failure of Britain and France to respond to the unilateral German denunciation of the Treaty of Versailles...'5 Evidently, Kissinger feels that Germany was over reacting to the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles, and infers that Hitler 'exploited' it simply to achieve what he desired.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Halder gave evidence a year later against leading members of the Nazi party at the Nuremburg War Crimes Trial. In his statement, (source E), Halder claims that during a conversation with other high-ranking Nazi officers, G�ring shouted 'The only one who really knows about the Reichstag building is I, for I set fire to it'.

  1. Hitler's consolidation of power was achieved mainly through lawful than unlawful means yet the ...

    As is shown between sources B to D the night of the long knives was one of them. In source D and from my own knowledge it is shown that Hitler ordered the night of the long knives so that he could murder his opposition and therefore strengthen his power.

  2. Hitler came to power by his own efforts. Discuss.

    He wrote it during the few months he spent in prison for treason in 1923. Hitler's party was very well arranged. He made sure that the people who were in charge of different areas were wholly competent. One of his ministers was an expert in propaganda and won much support for Hitler.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work