• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The October Russian Revolution - A Spontaneous Popular Workers' Revolution or a Coup d'etat?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The October Russian Revolution - A Spontaneous Popular Workers' Revolution or a Coup d'etat? After the abdication of the Tsar in February 1917, it became inevitable there would be another revolution to follow. Under Lenin the Bolsheviks became one of the strongest political parties in Russia. After the September elections the Bolsheviks gained a majority vote totalling over 50%. With this and other contributing factors it became possible for the Bolsheviks to overthrow the Provisional Government and create another revolution. They eventually did this, however it is difficult to say whether this was a spontaneous popular workers' revolution or a coup d'etat. There is a majority of evidence that goes to support the idea that the Bolshevik revolution was a coup d'etat. In early October, Lenin convinced the Bolshevik Party to form an immediate insurrection against the Provisional Government. The Bolshevik leaders felt it was of the utmost importance to act quickly while they had the momentum to do so. ...read more.

Middle

Following this the Bolsheviks took control from the Provisional Government. The new Government would be made up of the various Soviets and led by the Bolsheviks. The fact that the thousands of people in the Red Guard knew to storm the Winter Palace after the shot was fired from the Battleship Aurora again shows some planning was involved, which supports the idea that the revolution was indeed a Coup d'etat. There are many events leading up to November 1917 that contribute to the argument that it was a spontaneous revolution. After the Tsar's abdication it was apparent that the Provisional Government was going to have to change a number of things to win support. Initially they gained some with the introduction of freedom of speech and less strict laws. However the two things that people wanted sorting most, was the withdrawal of Russia from the war, and the redistribution of the land. ...read more.

Conclusion

The majority of the soldiers in Petrograd were also striking due to the war issue not being dealt with, so few people were opposing the Red Guards. Both these factors could add to the argument that the Bolsheviks made a spontaneous decision to try and revolutionise Russia that day, as the situation was perfect for them to do so. The situation would have been too difficult for the Bolsheviks to set up which shows there was no planning for it. However this ideal situation wouldn't have meant anything without some careful planning by the Bolsheviks. This is evident as that day took key points in Petrograd and knew exactly how to go about completing the revolution. Also the meeting in October prior to the revolution shows that the majority of the Bolshevik leaders wanted a quick revolution, so plans must have been made after on how to go about completing this. Due to these facts I feel the November revolution was mainly a Coup d'etat, however there is a great deal of evidence to suggest the revolution was spontaneous. Sam James History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

    This suggests that the Revisionists thought that the October revolution was a popular revolution, as the majority of the population created the conditions in which the revolution could happen, by creating committees and soviets before the Bolsheviks came along. The traditional Soviet view of the October revolution claimed that it

  2. The Russian Revolution 1917

    came into being, it was controlled without sympathies for the workers in mind; was a matter of chance, or due to past events; but it would have been quite easy for the members of the provisional government to decide to appease the working class in order to win widespread support.

  1. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions ...

    Behind the front, goods became scarce, prices skyrocketed, and by 1917 famine threatened the larger cities. Discontent became rife, and the morale of the army suffered, finally to be undermined by a succession of military defeats. These reverses were attributed by many to the alleged treachery of Empress Alexandra and

  2. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    These hopes were dashed with the succession of Alexander the III as he publicly confessed to 'uphold the principle of autocracy'. With the support of the powerful Romanov church he felt that his position was unmovable. He also had support from the peasants who loved the tsar as 'their father'

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Herculean efforts were needed simply to hold out against imperialist encirclement. Lenin had an honest and realistic attitude to the terrible problems that the Russian proletariat faced as a result of isolation and backwardness. In January 1919, he explained in a speech to the Russian trade unions: "The workers were

  2. The Russian Revolution - 3 Essays

    The Duma had little influence over the Tsar and new laws, and the first two Dumas were dismissed for demanding reforms. Russia was an unfair society that desperately needed social, economic and political reform. Part 2 Why was the 1917 March successful?

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    He was elected Governor of Louisiana and began a program of state spending on schools, roads and available posts in the state government. Long used bribery and blackmail to get the votes of workers in state-run industries. If workers wanted to keep their jobs, they had to 'deliver the vote' of their families and friends as well.

  2. Was the War or the Period Prior to the War more to Blame for ...

    This was a problem because the population of the commoners was increasing which caused many food shortages, and also adding to the problem, a lot of the food produced had to be sent to the men on the war front.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work