• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The only reason the USSR went in o afghanistan was to crush islamic fundamentalism."

Extracts from this document...


"The only reason the USSR went in o afghanistan was to crush islamic fundamentalism." "The only reason they failed was the strength of islamic fundamentalism" How valid are these statements? There were numerous reasons why USSR went in to Afghanistan and why they failed. Thus these two statements are both true only to a certain extent. USSR went in to Afghanistan to crush islamic fundamentalism because it was a threat to the Soviet's communist regime which included decrees abolishing usury, banning forced marriages, state recognition of women's rights to vote, replacing religious and traditional laws with secular and Marxist ones, banning tribal courts, and land reform. Men were obliged to cut their beards, women couldn't wear a burqa, and mosque visiting was forbidden. Which were all indeed the main principles of islamic fundamentalism. USSR was scared that Islamic fundamentalism would spread to the muslim population in the USSR and cause revolts which would then weaken the cohesion of the Soviet Union. ...read more.


Another reason for USSR's intervention in Afghanistan is to maintain their influence in the strategic region. It was important for the USSR's reputation globally to maintain the peace around their neighbouring countries. Otherwise they would seem weak and in a cold war an image counts a lot, thus if you seem weak you will lose. Thus Afghanistan was the perfect place for USSR to show its power to the rest of the world. As to conclude all my points, it was only to a certain extent that USSR went in to Afghanistan to crush Islamic fundamentalism.There were many other reasons for the USSR'S intervention in Afghanistan which include the friendship treaty, the reputation, ans etc. It could also be thought as the iceberg's unseen mass under water. The second statement which claims that the only reason why USSR failed in Afghanistan was because Mujaheddin( the afghan fundamentalist leader) ...read more.


Thus the same scene as in Vietnam, the soldiers being on drugs, was up again. Both these factors weakened the Red army and led them to a failure. The Red Army failed economically as well. The cost of the war was over 8 billion dollars which was too much for the USSR to afford. Because it was too expensive for the USSR Gorbachev decided to give up the fight and pull the troops out. Although some historians claim that eventhough the aid Afghanistan got from the US seemed to be higher than of the USSR's expenses if USSR had not pulled back the troops and fight for another year, they could have won. At last, there were many reasons for the intervention of the USSR in to Afghanistan as well as the reasons why they failed. It was more than the Islamic fundamentalism itself, thus both statements are true only to a certain extent. Zeynep Hatipoglu 13th Grade, History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Are any of these reasons more important that the others is causing some Palestinians ...

    Gaza City is the Strip's biggest population centre and has about 400,000 inhabitants. It is a commercial and administrative hub for the whole of the occupied territories, although travel is severely restricted between it and the West Bank. The majority of Gaza's residents are refugees who fled or were expelled

  2. In February 1943, the German army surrendered at Stalingrad. Was Hitler's interference the main ...

    had already fired his Commander-in-Chief (C-in-C), leaving the position available to anyone who sufficiently impressed Hitler. This meant that the generals were more concerned with impressing Hitler, making battles look decisive and dramatic, than considering in depth tactical details such as minimising casualties.

  1. How Far Was Gorbachev Responsible For The End Of Soviet Union?

    His actions destabilized the USSR because they were bad choices, and this would have a negative impact on the strength of the USSR. Historians believe he "yielded one position after another" (ZA P87) and this can be demonstrated in Poland, where he told the communists under Rakowski "the time has come to yield power" (CW P382).

  2. The basic idea of my project is to demonstrate that Colombia's global reputation, drugs ...

    They found out that in between 1928 and 2000, 70% of all the movies, projected a negative image of the Italians. They also notices that 40% of all the characters involved in crime scenes were Italians. Some other 300 films of this type have gone into the market.

  1. The Duvalier regime compared to other dictatorships on Haiti during the middle of the ...

    When USA left Haiti in 1934 the country was plunged into political chaos, and in 1937 a war with the Dominican Republic.13 From 1934 to 1946 Haiti was "ruled" by two generals named Vincent and Lescot, but they had no real influence or power.

  2. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    Thus this reduced soviet grip over the satellite states. Another key feature was the disassembling of the Berlin Wall in 1989 which symbolised the end of soviet control over Eastern Europe. People were able to cross the borders and be reunited with family and friends.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work