• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The outbreak of the First World War in 1914 grew out of a short term crisis in the Balkans, but any attempt to understand

Extracts from this document...


Causes of the First World War "The outbreak of the First World War in 1914 grew out of a short term crisis in the Balkans, but any attempt to understand its origins must take into account a number of long standing developments." (McDonough). To discuss this judgement, we must investigate the causes of the First World War, the consequences of these actions, and to what extent were they responsible for the start of the war. A long term and economical cause was colonial rivalry between the major European superpowers. Other long term political causes include the Anglo-German naval race, both of the Moroccan crisis, which all, among other things heightened the tension within Europe, eventually leading to war. Another long term ideological and political cause is the alliance systems which is responsible for the turning a possibly localized war into a world one, while another long term ideological and economic cause was the Balkan problem: disagreements on what the fate of the 'sick man of Europe' ought to be. Last, but not least, the spark of the war was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, which, if not for the aforementioned factors, would have a much smaller consequence than a world war. In fact, if not for the tension which was built and maintained for around the last three decades, this last cause may not even be a cause for war. So, yes, I agree with McDonough: I believe that although it was this last event that sparked war, it would have had no significant effect if the long term causes had not taken place. ...read more.


The First Moroccan Crisis (The Tangier Crisis, 1905) came about because the Kaiser felt threatened by the dual entente of England and France, he wanted to test the true strength of France, and see if she would declare war on Germany. Another motive was that the Kaiser wanted to test the nature of the Dual Entente (he had a suspicion France and England had a secret military agreement which aimed to encircle Germany). So, in 1905, just when France was ready to make Morocco into one of her colonies, Germany stepped in and demanded to have a say in this matter. The Kaiser arrogantly arrived in Tangier (Morocco's main city) in an act designed to provoke. The consequence was that the other countries felt threatened by Germany, and therefore brought about military conversations between England and France to discuss how France would be protected if attacked by Germany. This clearly divided the European powers into two main sides. So, contradictory to the Kaiser's intentions, this exercise only served to strengthen France and England's relationship, caused them to become anti-German and alerted the other European powers to Germany as a threat. It caused tension to rise, almost causing war to break out there and then. Instead, England and France had promised mutual military aid against Germany. Not only did this guarantee that if there was a war involving either countries, it would be big, involving both countries' numerous colonies, but it also exacerbated Kaiser's fears, causing him to interfere yet again, now that he knew (caused) ...read more.


Serbia, who wanted to negotiate, consented to most of the terms, but was rejected by Austria who wanted immediate agreement to all of the demands. On July 28, 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, prompting Germany, France and Russia to get involved. Later, Britain also got involved to ensure Belgian neutrality. Thus, the First World War began. So it was not the colonial rivalry or the problems in the Balkans, nor was it the rising tension due to the Anglo-German naval race that started the First World War. It was the cumulative consequences of the all the aforementioned events. It was tension and the nationalism created by colonial rivalry; it was fear of the German Weltpolitik, the international tension it created and the push towards alliance systems that it provided; it was the chain reaction guaranteed by the alliance systems; it was the heightened tension resulting from the Moroccan crisis as well as the Anglo French military promises that came as a consequence of mutual fear of German attack; it was the problem of German encirclement and what she would do to escape her fear; it was the tension caused by the Balkan problems, and last but not least, it was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, which was the spark Europe needed to embark on the war that was ready to begin. So, in conclusion, World War I "grew out of a short term crisis in the Balkans, but any attempt to understand its origins must take into account a number of long standing developments." Without all the aforementioned causes, the July Crisis 1914 would merely be a localized war, if even that. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why Did The First World War Break Out in 1914?

    5 star(s)

    As the construction of a massive fleet was being debated and agreed by the Kaiser, his military and political advisors another undertaking, of great relevance to future German naval strategy, was being completed. The Kiel Canal, which opened in 1895, provided the German navy with a fast connection between the

  2. To what extent was the Alliance System responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    She also wanted to recover her national prestige by acquiring overseas colonies such as Morocco. Britain, on the other hand, had a very powerful position mainly because of her location and her policy of isolationism. She was the most industrially advanced country in Europe with the largest navy and colonies in the world.

  1. World War 1 - long and short term causes of the war.

    Gavrilo got expelled from his school for breaking the rules and therefore decided to go and join Apis. Anyway, one day in 1914, a newspaper announced the exact arrival and whereabouts of Franz Ferdinand and his tour of Bosnia. Each of the Black Hand members saw this as a great

  2. To what extent was Germany responsible for causing the First World War?

    almost equally; "The unthinkable happened because in each of the Great States, leaders did certain things that inflamed the crisis, or failed to do things that might have eased it. All shared in some degree the responsibility for the general failure."

  1. Explain why events in the Balkans contributed to the growth of international tension in ...

    Yet, surprisingly it was not the Balkans who were the catalyst in this saga - the tension building up between Great Britain and Germany since 1897 was steadily growing, widening the gap between alliances and making the possibility of reconciliation less likely.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  1. "The breakdown of the Concert of Europe was mainly caused by disagreements amongst the ...

    Worst of all, Austria and Prussia did not see the usefulness of the alliance and they simply signed it to please Russia. The signing of Treaty of Quintuple was insincere. In 1818, after the Congress of Aix-La-Chappele, the Powers accepted France as the fifth Power, not treating it as a defeated power any more.

  2. Germany should bear the responsibility for the outbreak of a general war in 1914 ...

    As for Weltpolitik, it led to a marked increase in tension within the sphere of international relations. Marxist historians hold the view that imperial rivalry and the influence of monopoly capital were major underlying reasons for the war. The Marxist interpretation saw the war as being the direct consequence of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work