• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

The philosophy of totalitarianism: What is it and how does it affect our understanding of the past?

Extracts from this document...


The philosophy of totalitarianism: What is it and how does it affect our understanding of the past? Synopsis Initially having the aim of analysing Hitler's rise to power, this paper now addresses the reality of totalitarianism and what it takes for any given state to be defined as totalitarian and the effects it has on the perception of such regimes throughout history; with a focus on Nazi Germany. A general conclusion had to be reached through comparison between the philosophies of both Zbigniew Brzezinski and Carl Friedrich, as set out in their book 'Totalitarian dictatorship and autocracy' published 1956 and revised in 1965, and Hannah Arendt, in her book The 'Origins of Totalitarianism' published 1952, with support from source material describing the realities of life under Hitler. This paper highlights that it is of utmost importance that a totalitarian state be studied without automatically applying outdated stereotypical, ineffective, biased criteria; exactly what Arendt and Brzezinski have provided us with. It is through the use of a range of sources that the inadequacies in the definitions posed by Brzezinki and Arendt are unveiled and consequently identified. It follows that these inadequacies are inherent in every generic description of the qualities of any given political system and as such the usefulness of these definitions as comparative terms is extremely limited. This fact does not however deter people from using these terms in writing history to categorise leaders and regimes; it does not deter historians from allowing biases creeping into their work through the use of these words. This paper has been formed through analysis of a broad spectrum of sources, mainly secondary sources. The references were carefully chosen with emphasis being given to the use of memoirs as well as revisionist histories from recent times and closer to the 1930's and 1940's. Such sources were included simply because it is important that histories come from different times and as such suffer from different contextual influences. ...read more.


growth in armed forces.19 The economy of the totalitarian state must be effectively directed with only so much control that the system can be directed effectively; it must obtain growth and combat economic problems to the best of its ability so as to ensure political, social and economic stability. Conversely, Arendt argues that "the totalitarian dictator regards the natural and industrial riches of each country ... as a source of loot and a means of preparing the next step of aggressive expansion".20 Arendt thus labels the totalitarian economy as a war economy, but it is not necessary for a totalitarian leader to adopt such an economy as such economies finance expansionistic foreign policies and totalitarianism does not have to have an international focus; rather it must have a national focus. Arendt is too specific on this point and is once again directly attacking Hitler rather than discussing the realities of totalitarianism. Totalitarianism does not require "state ownership of all the means of production and distribution but, rather, a central control and direction of the economy"21; with only so much control so as to ensure central direction. A totalitarian state refers to the structure of the state, and not necessarily the aspirations of the leader. Similarly, the economy does need to be centrally directed, but it does not have to be directed so as to be a war economy. No matter what economic system the state chooses to facilitate, there needs to be a "monopoly of the means of effective mass communication"22 so as to ensure that economic, social and political goals can be obtained and the people can be informed of such successes. Contrary to Brzezinski's criterion, a totalitarian state does not need to control every method of mass communication, rather there is only a requirement to strongly regulate, influence or control a majority of all the major methods of mass communication subject to the discretion of the leader. ...read more.


The only thing 'wrong' with Shirer's book is that he is an American expelled from Germany once war broke out. He also, however, lived in Germany for many years before that, giving him not only an insight into the German people from about Hitler's rise but an understanding of the people that put Hitler into power. His account is balanced and does not seem to be writing from an anti-Nazi perspective, which he probably does to ensure his credibility remains intact and his book remains usefulness as a source; he achieved this. Process Log November, 2003 Decided on a paper focussing on the Battle of Stalingrad, but had no precise question in mind. I began my research by reading books on Stalingrad and about Nazi Germany with an emphasis on Hitler's state of mind. December, 2003 Reading continued, other research was undertaken in the form of internet research and looking for other electronic and physical sources. I enjoyed the holidays. January, 2004 Reading and research trailed off, giving way to continued enjoyment of the holidays. February, 2004 Research began again, reading progressed well. Question changed focus to why Hitler lost. Discussed ideas and changes to the question with Mr Davis, he located me some useful sources to add to my growing collection. March, 2004 I called and emailed J�rgen Tampke, Professor of History at UNSW, with the help of Mr Davis. Mr Tampke helped me refine my question further, but accidentally pointed me in the direction of the rise of Hitler. His emails contained sources that he recommended I use. My focus was in doubt, and as such I could tell I was about to change my question again. April, 2004 Due to exams and an extremely busy Easter Holidays, minimal work was achieved over this time. May, 2004 By this time I had changed my question briefly to the Rise of Hitler and soon after I changed it to an investigation on what totalitarianism really is. I received Arendt's book courtesy of the ANU library, Mr Davis subsequently provided me with a paperback copy which he 'forgot he had. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitler a totalitarian dictator?

    The government of the Reich shall issue the prescriptions required for the execution of such contracts. This meant legislations became useless as they could simply be ignored and unions could not use anything to oppose the regime. Finally 5. Once the current Reich government was succeeded the laws implemented by the previous Reich government become invalid.

  2. To what extent was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state?

    that everyone thought it was or led to believe. Gestapo members were low for total German population (approx 30,000 members) most of the investigations stemmed from the voluntary denunciations (80%) from Germans! However most of this did not come on support for the nazi regime, most of it came from hate, greed, and spite of other people.

  1. Was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state?

    majority of the people were actually either good Nazis, brainwashed into Nazis, were too afraid to stand up to the Nazis, or were quite satisfied with what they were getting to worry about the Nazis. Germany was totalitarian, because the Nazis had no legal political opponents.

  2. To What Extent Was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian State 1933-1939?

    Thus Hitler was able to extend and secure his leadership party making it even harder for other parties to oppose and win. Hitler was supported truly by the upper-middle class. He offered them a security blanket towards communism. However the majority of germane citizens were middle-class.

  1. How did Hitler turn Germany into a totalitarian state?

    Whether the teacher agreed or not they were forced to teach the children about Hitler and his greatness. In fear of losing their job, or of the pupils informing on them. All pupils were given lessons on the superiority of the Aryan race, and each lesson influenced this in some way shape or form.

  2. How did Hitler establish a dictatorship?

    On March 21, in the Garrison Church at Potsdam, the burial place of Frederick the Great, a complicated ceremony took place designed to ease public concern over Hitler and his gangster-like new government. President Hindenburg, foreign diplomats, the General Staff and all the old guard going back to the days of the Kaiser, attended it.

  1. Between 1933 and 1945 Hitler and the Nazi Part were successful in their creation ...

    Based on unsatisfactory results, unrest seemed to grow amongst farmers between 1936 and 1939. Ultimately, the Nazis failed to reach their aim of Volksgemeinshaft in the life of farmers, because it's policies seemed to backfire on them. It seemed that the peasant's reaction to the Nazis policies fluctuated between "a

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    Their attitudes indicate that Germans assented to these measures to make Germany judenrein, free of Jews... The inescapable truth is that, regarding Jews, German political views had evolved to the point where an enormous number of ordinary, representative Germans became...Hitler's Willing Executioners."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work