• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Policy of Appeasement

Extracts from this document...


The Policy of Appeasement By Omar Omar Y10A Controversial even now, historians and war critics have been in debate whether or not the policy of Appeasement was justified enough. In this essay I will present evidence and facts for both sides before reaching a conclusion based on my understanding of the subject. To appease means 'to pacify and conciliate and bring peace of mind'. To British politicians at the time this may have seemed a good idea, but by all view the policy failed to either satisfy Hitler or bring peace of mind. When Hitler rose to power in Germany in 1933 he had made his intentions clear. To list a few of his aims he planned to expand German territory and restore her both politically, economically and-militarily. He had said so in his 'My Struggle' book when he said that 'all our strength is needed to raise up our nation once more from the embrace of the international python'. As for gaining new territory he explicitly stated that 'colonization of the eastern frontiers is of extreme importance'. ...read more.


4 years earlier he had tried to take over Austria but now he renewed his interests. There are a few reasons why he wanted Austria. Firstly, it was the country of his birth and had strong affections for it. Secondly, it was a German-speaking country. Hitler believed that both belonged in 'one greater Germany'. Many Austrians were pleased at the prospect of uniting with Germany as their country was economically weak. Hitler ordered the Nazi party in Germany to stage demonstrations calling for union to make it look like Austrian Chancellor Schuschnig was unable to run his own country. When he asked for British and French aid he was refused it so he had no choice but to call for a referendum calling for Austrians to vote whether or not they wanted union. In March 1938 Hitler sent his troops to 'watch over' the voting process. Not surprisingly, given the situation, %100 voted pro-union. Hitler now had his eye on another country-Czechoslovakia. He wanted to take over its German-speaking population, mostly found in an area called the Sudetenland. ...read more.


Besides, Britain had its own problems, facing high unemployment and a long economic drought. It would need the backing of the rest of the Empire and the USA. They were not sure Commonwealth countries would support another war while the US had an isolation (neutral) policy. In truth, the appeasement did nothing but encourage Hitler to take bigger risks. According to the views of some critics had Britain and France threatened Germany with war then it would've backed off as it was not ready to fight. The opposite pro-appeasement argument is that the Appeasement Policy was right at the time as it bought time for Britain to build up its forces in case it went to war. Also Hitler was opposing the USSR meaning that if Britain gave Hitler what he wanted then he could fight of the USSR for them. However, this was very unlikely as Germany herself was still building up its army. In short, the Appeasement had failed as by trying to avoid war at all costs had brought on the very thing that Britain had been trying to avoid from the very start-war. A big reason was that Chamberlain and the British took Hitler to be a rational actor who would remain true to his word. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Was appeasement Justified? What was "appeasement"?

    The 'guilty men' theory, as it was called, viewed the appeasing of Hitler's Germany was the wrong decision to take. The people from source J3 and source F, lived through the second world war and therefore their response is very emotional, they needed to blame someone for this horrific war.

  2. To What Extent was British Appeasement to Germany in the Interwar Period Justified?

    the world because they failed to understand the danger in which they found themselves. As it was, Hitler was strengthened not weakened,"11 In critically examining both authors, one can perceive biased attitudes, instead of ideally objective approaches. C Evaluation of sources Historical sources must be analyzed critically before synthesizing conclusions.

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    Britain and France were shocked to find that Hitler had broken the agreement and agreed to interfere if he took anymore territory in Europe. This they were forced to do when Hitler gambled again and invaded Poland, a nation that Britain had pledged to defend.

  2. British Policy of Appeasement May 1937 - March 1939.

    September 1938, and on 29th September, Adolf Hitler, Neville Chamberlain, Edouard Daladier and Benito Mussolini signed the Munich Agreement which transferred to Germany the Sudetenland - a fortified frontier region in Czechoslovakia that contained a large German-speaking population. When the Czechoslovakian head of state, Eduard Benes, who had not been

  1. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    The Allies had been occupied with the crisis in Abyssinia. 3 "Allies were preoccupied with Italy's invasion of Abyssinia". The Rhineland had been ordered to be permanently demilitarized in the Treaty of Versailles. It was on the 2nd of March that Hitler issued the order and it was on the 7th of March that the troops moved into the Rhineland.

  2. Is "appeasement" as a kind of cowardice?

    Even then, Hitler declared war on the US before the US declared war on Germany. Was the policy of appeasement justified? The policy of appeasement means that Chamberlain should of kept peace at any cost. There are numerous arguments for and against appeasement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work