• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Roman army

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction The Roman army is still admired today by historians and many others alike. How far advanced technologically the Romans were over 2000 years ago still amazes many people today. They built roads that a still used today, their baths are still admired with many still standing and much of today's archaeology dates back to Roman and Greek principals. The Roman army itself was the most feared army of that period and it too is a cause of fascination. Thankfully, due to the Romans writing a lot down, there are many sources (unlike in the "Dark Ages" for example) available to study how the Roman army worked. In this project, the aim is to find out how the training and organization of the army made it as effective as it was. How did the training and organization of the Roman army make it as effective as it was? When the Roman army was at its peak, during the 1st and 2nd century AD, it was too strong for most of the other forces to overcome. In this project I aim to show how two parts of the Roman army: a) its training b) its organization, helped make it so effective. The Roman army was an attractive occupation at that time. This is an important point to note. ...read more.

Middle

Josephus, A History of the Jewish War No other force in the world at that time trained as hard as the Romans did. They trained as though they were in a battle, so that when they did come to an actual battle they would be fitter than their opponents and would know exactly what their specific task was and how they should do their task. They therefore had an advantage over their enemy before the battle had even begun. This shows that the organization of the Roman army made it more effective. Discipline was also paramount to the success of the Roman army. The rules were strict and anyone found to be disobeying the rules was dealt with severely: "The soldier who deserts to the enemy but then returns shall be tortured and condemned to wild animals or to the rack." "The soldier who in battle does something prohibited by his commanding officer or does not obey orders is executed even if his actions are successful." Both extracts from Modestinus, The Digest of Laws This strict method of discipline ensured that very few soldiers would step out of line; in fact there are hardly any recorded mutinies. They would be very obedient to their commanding officer and disciplined. ...read more.

Conclusion

These legions were divided into ten cohorts. A cohort was made up of six centuries. A century was the size of ten contubernia. Finally, one contubernium was made up of eight or ten men, this figure varies depending on the size of the army under different emperors. All twenty-five of the legions were numbered and given names that related to something important or of significance for that legion. Vegetius, when describing the Roman army of the 4th century AD, simplifies why the Roman army was better than anyone they came up against, explaining that the reasons the Romans won were due to their training, discipline and practice in war: "We see that the Roman people have subjugated the whole world by no means other than thorough training in the use of weapons, strict discipline in the military camps, and practice in warfare." Vegetius, A Book About Military Affairs Overall, the Roman army was stronger than anybody else at that time, in all the crucial departments. They trained harder, they were more disciplined, were better prepared for warfare and the soldiers were more contented overall. The fascinating point to note about it all is that in between all the battles, they built towns and buildings that still stand today and are marvelled at by the people of today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Why was the Roman Army so Successful? Rome was one ...

    which were sometimes worn to help keep the soldier warm. The roman's weapons were much more advanced than the other army's weapons during that period. Using the equipment wisely was very important, so the Roman soldiers were taught some tactics and strategies that sometimes ended up saving their lives!

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    the Romans were well trained and organization they met their match in the Celts who often terrified the Romans into defeat. Also I come to the conclusion that the Romans were not superior to the Celts in their tactics. A famous writer who agrees with me proves this.

  1. What does archaeology show about the life of a Roman soldier in Roman Britain?

    It also shows a soldier would always have to be prepared for battle, as the unexpected could come at any time at all. The other purpose of polishing the armour was so that the glare off the armour from the sun would scare the enemy.

  2. Organization, Training and Discipline: How Did these Factors Contribute to the Success of the ...

    Soldiers trained as surveyors, engineers and architects ensured that the legion needed little outside help for its building requirements. Administrative duties were performed by other legionaries within their unit. They were a professional fighting force that signed up for twenty-five years service.

  1. Describe how a Roman Soldier was armed and how the army was organised - ...

    It was strapped to the right hand side of the body which led to a very awkward motion when removing the sword from its scabbard. There were also grooves in the handle which led to extra grip for the soldiers.

  2. What is the Evidence for the Roman Occupation of the Antonine Wall?

    However, it is evident that no large hostile movements would have gone unnoticed. We know from the inscriptions on distance slabs that all three legions were involved in the occupation and the building of the Wall. However, all the stones of Legio VI and all but one of Legio XX

  1. Why the Roman army was so good

    They were not also good at arms and armour but also at decorating each piece of equipment with fine details. Segmented Plate Cuirass and Body Armour Given the name lorica segmentata by modern historians, this was made from steel plate armor which was riveted together securely enough to withstand sword

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    while the whites ignored the treaty of fort Laramie in 1868 due to their lure for wealth. Conflict was inevitable, as neither culture would back down. Custer in the meantime infuriated U.S Grant with a march testimony on Indian service corruption so his request of taking the seventh cavalry into the field, was denied.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work